Jump to content

2016-17 free agency thread (NON WHITE SOX RELATED)


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 08:47 AM)
Reported last night that #Dodgers are finalist for Romo and also talking to Blanton. Another reliever who remains on their radar: Blevins.

https://twitter.com/Ken_Rosenthal/status/827557893826306049

 

If romo signs with dodgers could be a fallout of nationals going after robertson since they were on romo

:pray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 618
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 07:05 AM)
Rays and Pirates have been doing it longer.

 

They would basically do it out the gate though, before the player established any presence - especially not to the level of Sale, Q and Eaton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Feb 3, 2017 -> 07:23 PM)
Source: Sergio Romo, #Dodgers agree on contract. @MLBNetwork @MLB

https://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/827687326927106048

 

Nationals have to be getting desperate.

 

Highly doubt. Shawn Kelley is very good, and their bullpen is better than most people realize anyways. Robertson is a midway point trade piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Feb 6, 2017 -> 05:05 AM)
lol. Jason Hammel signing with the Royals is an indication that Q stays? 0 chance. No way Sox were giving him a 2 year deal. Other pitchers still on the market just like him.

 

Felt for a while now he was the replacement for Q if a move is made. It's fine though, don't mind Q staying based on some of these mediocre trade proposals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 5, 2017 -> 10:10 PM)
Felt for a while now he was the replacement for Q if a move is made. It's fine though, don't mind Q staying based on some of these mediocre trade proposals.

 

They can get anyone still available to replace Q...they can just bring back Peavy. They're not going to compete either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 5, 2017 -> 10:10 PM)
Felt for a while now he was the replacement for Q if a move is made. It's fine though, don't mind Q staying based on some of these mediocre trade proposals.

I don't think there's any correlation between the two moves at all. The Sox can easily sign a one year stopgap not named Hammel to round out the pitching staff for 2017 if Q is traded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 5, 2017 -> 10:10 PM)
Felt for a while now he was the replacement for Q if a move is made. It's fine though, don't mind Q staying based on some of these mediocre trade proposals.

 

I don't really think the Sox care about a replacement. No matter who it is, I think the goal is to have a couple of these starters up here for the 2nd half of the season, which means if someone sucks and gets dumped, no big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Feb 6, 2017 -> 10:10 AM)
I don't really think the Sox care about a replacement. No matter who it is, I think the goal is to have a couple of these starters up here for the 2nd half of the season, which means if someone sucks and gets dumped, no big deal.

 

Exactly. They just need a warm body to eat MLB innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...