Bob Sacamano Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) If the Sox are torn between him and someone else that plays a premium position, I would hope that they would pick the guy at the premium position. Also, doesn't all this Beer talk belong in the 2018 draft discussion? Edited March 2, 2017 by soxfan2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Feb 25, 2017 -> 08:32 PM) Alex from Fangraphs said that the Sox are looking to acquire athletic guys that play premium positions, which is something they lack in their system I thought the Sox were changing their drafting philosphy? This is the philosophy that people began to hate recent of drafting athletic guys like Anderson, Hawkins, walker etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (ptatc @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 10:56 AM) I thought the Sox were changing their drafting philosphy? This is the philosophy that people began to hate recent of drafting athletic guys like Anderson, Hawkins, walker etc. And it doesn't really gel with the Collins pick haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 1, 2017 -> 01:16 PM) This. Especially Erstad was well worth the draft pick. Not to mention he said Erstad wasn't a premium position. I would consider CF a premium position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (ptatc @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 10:56 AM) I thought the Sox were changing their drafting philosphy? This is the philosophy that people began to hate recent of drafting athletic guys like Anderson, Hawkins, walker etc. Hawkins is a bad miss. Anderson is a good pick. The issue is that Reinsdorf was against spending money on amateur players and KW loved tools, athletes. Drafting tools athletes is fine but drafting ones that also don't cost a lot of money isn't a sound strategy. They need baseball players and Hostetler drafted many guys with more traditional baseball and on base skills. He is on the record saying that he wishes he would have taken more high school guys and he even said they are looking at high school players in this year's draft. It has to be both is what I'm saying. You always want guys that play premium positions because those guys can play other spots. Nick Hostetler comes from the Schuerholz school of scouting. I would expect a focus to be on power pitching and athletes. Dayton Moore subscribes to the same theory and Chris Getz worked under him for years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 11:05 AM) Hawkins is a bad miss. Anderson is a good pick. The issue is that Reinsdorf was against spending money on amateur players and KW loved tools, athletes. Drafting tools athletes is fine but drafting ones that also don't cost a lot of money isn't a sound strategy. They need baseball players and Hostetler drafted many guys with more traditional baseball and on base skills. He is on the record saying that he wishes he would have taken more high school guys and he even said they are looking at high school players in this year's draft. It has to be both is what I'm saying. You always want guys that play premium positions because those guys can play other spots. Nick Hostetler comes from the Schuerholz school of scouting. I would expect a focus to be on power pitching and athletes. Dayton Moore subscribes to the same theory and Chris Getz worked under him for years. by a hair haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 11:05 AM) Hawkins is a bad miss. Anderson is a good pick. The issue is that Reinsdorf was against spending money on amateur players and KW loved tools, athletes. Drafting tools athletes is fine but drafting ones that also don't cost a lot of money isn't a sound strategy. They need baseball players and Hostetler drafted many guys with more traditional baseball and on base skills. He is on the record saying that he wishes he would have taken more high school guys and he even said they are looking at high school players in this year's draft. It has to be both is what I'm saying. You always want guys that play premium positions because those guys can play other spots. Nick Hostetler comes from the Schuerholz school of scouting. I would expect a focus to be on power pitching and athletes. Dayton Moore subscribes to the same theory and Chris Getz worked under him for years. I don't recall Hawkins or Walker or mitchell being players signed because they were cheap. So what you're saying is that they are going to stick with the same philosophy of drafting athletes just pick better and younger ones? This board should have a field day with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Feb 28, 2017 -> 06:50 PM) Pat Burrell, Darin Erstad, Nevin didn't play a premium psotion Darin Erstad didn't play a premium position? Darin Erstad was a two time gold glove winner in CF, and the metrics back it up. Darin Erstad absolutely played a premium position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 05:40 PM) Darin Erstad didn't play a premium position? Darin Erstad was a two time gold glove winner in CF, and the metrics back it up. Darin Erstad absolutely played a premium position. How are we ranking the positions in terms of premium? I'd probably go... SS CF 3B RF C 2B LF 1B So where do we draw the line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 07:13 PM) How are we ranking the positions in terms of premium? I'd probably go... SS CF 3B RF C 2B LF 1B So where do we draw the line? Catcher I believe should be top 3 for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 07:35 PM) Catcher I believe should be top 3 for sure. I went back and forth on that, but I feel like that position has taken a hit the past few years. Hence the question on if it should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 07:13 PM) How are we ranking the positions in terms of premium? I'd probably go... SS CF 3B RF C 2B LF 1B So where do we draw the line? I would look to positional adjustments for WAR. C +12.5 1B -12.5 2B +2.5 SS +7.5 3B +2.5 LF -7.5 CF +2.5 RF -7.5 DH -17.5 So, in order, C, SS, 2B/3B/CF, LF/RF, 1B, DH. Considering how difficult it has been historically to find a good SS, we are living in a veritable golden age. Tim Anderson would be considered one of the best up and coming shortstops 6 years ago. Now people hardly know who he is. Here's the list of players who put up 2.0 WAR or more in 2010 http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=...=&players=0 And now 2016 http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=...=&players=0 But, point being, if you find a catcher who can hit, play in 120 games, and produce excellent numbers offensively, you are talking about an MVP candidate. The problem lies in the fact that it's a grueling position to play and destroys the body, so said player is virtually theoretical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Is this Kris Bubic pitcher on Stanford a top prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 01:03 AM) Hindsight is 20/20 Of course it is, but that is completely besides the point. One would hope that baseball executives learn from history, particularly recent history. I think that premium positions should be important, but this is a fascinating topic. Identifying solid bats at premium defensive positions is obviously ideal, but so difficult because players that tend to be ahead of the curve offensively often tend to be ahead of the growth curve to remain at those same premium positions. Such a mindf*** for scouts trying to project some of these guys. Gets you to the point where you're utilizing almost all projection to try and find the few guys that will produce offensively and be able to remain at their premium position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thad Bosley Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 12:05 PM) Hawkins is a bad miss. Anderson is a good pick. The issue is that Reinsdorf was against spending money on amateur players and KW loved tools, athletes. Drafting tools athletes is fine but drafting ones that also don't cost a lot of money isn't a sound strategy. They need baseball play ers and Hostetler drafted many guys with more traditional baseball and on base skills. He is on the record saying that he wishes he would have taken more high school guys and he even said they are looking at high school players in this year's draft. It has to be both is what I'm saying. You always want guys that play premium positions because those guys can play other spots. Nick Hostetler comes from the Schuerholz school of scouting. I would expect a focus to be on power pitching and athletes. Dayton Moore subscribes to the same theory and Chris Getz worked under him for years. So I know I'm the evil "Reinsdorf Bogeyman", but don't you see how this guy's philosophy has crippled the organization over the years, even in recent years? He's not new to Major League Baseball and it's ways. He's been in the game for nearly 40 years, yet his strategy and vision continue to be fraught with flawed thinking. So frustrating... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Share Posted March 4, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Mar 2, 2017 -> 08:16 AM) If his bat is as good as advertised, he can DH for all I care and I'd still take him 1st overall. Gross Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted March 4, 2017 Author Share Posted March 4, 2017 In all serious that would be a terrible pick, when you draft a DH first overall or a projected DH. There's a reason why up the middle players are always the first players taken in any draft and the top international targets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Mar 4, 2017 -> 01:20 AM) In all serious that would be a terrible pick, when you draft a DH first overall or a projected DH. There's a reason why up the middle players are always the first players taken in any draft and the top international targets If he was projected to potentially play a corner spot and he was around the 6 or 7 pick and we picked there, I'd probably take him. But probably not first overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 What if he can hit like Schwarber? What was he, pick # 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 QUOTE (oldsox @ Mar 4, 2017 -> 10:19 AM) What if he can hit like Schwarber? What was he, pick # 4? He was also drafted into a loaded farm. Hopefully the Sox are at that point in 2018 though I would still prefer a premium position player with a similar bat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Christopher Crawford @Crawford_MILB Just had a source with a team picking in the top ten say they like him more wth the bat. He's good at baseball. Aaron Fitt @aaronfitt So, um, I guess Brendan McKay’s “minor” abdominal injury sure was minor. Dude struck out 15 today over 7 scoreless vs. Pitt; just 2 H, 1 BB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Burke Granger @burkegranger Kyle Wright | RHP | Vanderbilt. 4IP, 10H, 6R, 5ER, 1BB, 7K. Wright still winless on season. Topped 100 pitches in just 4 innings #MLBDraft Wright has had a rough go of it so far this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirtySox Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 Aaron Fitt @aaronfitt Here’s your crazy @UofLBaseball Brendan McKay stat of the day: His batting average (.548) is higher than his ERA (0.50). Are you serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 QUOTE (DirtySox @ Mar 13, 2017 -> 12:39 PM) Aaron Fitt @aaronfitt Here’s your crazy @UofLBaseball Brendan McKay stat of the day: His batting average (.548) is higher than his ERA (0.50). Are you serious? To be fair, if you're a good pitcher and hitter, your batting average SHOULD be better than your ERA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmarComing25 Posted March 13, 2017 Share Posted March 13, 2017 QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Mar 13, 2017 -> 03:40 PM) To be fair, if you're a good pitcher and hitter, your batting average SHOULD be better than your ERA. Explain? So a good pitcher should have an ERA well under 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts