TheFutureIsNear Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 As of right now there are 139 official free agents... http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-offs...g-world-series/ who are some of your favorite (realistic) targets out of this initial bunch? Not a whole lot to be inspired about there honestly. There are a whole bunch of mediocre stop gaps out there that I kinda hope we avoid, but have a feeling the FO won't. I can definitely see them overpaying for some sort of combo of signing a Brandon Moss/Adam Lind/Pedro Alvarez for DH and then Castro/Suzuki/Wieters for C and still being very mediocre. Hopefully I'm wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (TheFutureIsNear @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:14 AM) As of right now there are 139 official free agents... http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/mlb-offs...g-world-series/ who are some of your favorite (realistic) targets out of this initial bunch? Not a whole lot to be inspired about there honestly. There are a whole bunch of mediocre stop gaps out there that I kinda hope we avoid, but have a feeling the FO won't. I can definitely see them overpaying for some sort of combo of signing a Brandon Moss/Adam Lind/Pedro Alvarez for DH and then Castro/Suzuki/Wieters for C and still being very mediocre. Hopefully I'm wrong. I expect them to rebuild and trade off some pieces. I would be stunned if they signed a FA with a QO attached though. I don't think it happens but I could see the Lind/Alvarez, Jason Castro, CF offseason again. I'd actually sign Jason Castro regardless if they deal off some guys. His pitch framing is an asset for a rebuilding or contending team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/03/2016...ree-agents.html Here's a list organized by position. It's a garbage list. The worst I can remember. For some reason I think we will sign Rajai Davis or Chris Coghlan, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:27 AM) http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/03/2016...ree-agents.html Here's a list organized by position. It's a garbage list. The worst I can remember. For some reason I think we will sign Rajai Davis or Chris Coghlan, lol. Davis as a 4th OF/platoon partner with Tilson/pinch runner I'd take. Expecially if we go a rebuild route. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 If they go the sell route, I'd like to see them add as many guys on one year deals that are looking to rebuild value as stop gaps and to potentially flip in June/July. Wieters, Ramos, Gomez are three guys who come to mind but all 3 could easily re-sign with their old teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:27 AM) http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/03/2016...ree-agents.html Here's a list organized by position. It's a garbage list. The worst I can remember. For some reason I think we will sign Rajai Davis or Chris Coghlan, lol. pls subdivide by hero status thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chetkincaid Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:46 AM) Davis as a 4th OF/platoon partner with Tilson/pinch runner I'd take. Expecially if we go a rebuild route. If you're doing a full rebuild, why give sign a vet like Davis and give him at bats and playing time? Give that to a young prospect who's trying to prove himself. We might get a late bloomer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Chet Kincaid @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:51 AM) If you're doing a full rebuild, why give sign a vet like Davis and give him at bats and playing time? Give that to a young prospect who's trying to prove himself. We might get a late bloomer. Yeah I guess Coats can fill that role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBWSF Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 It's very simple. Have the White Sox sign Cespedes. Everything changes for the better if he's playing on the White Sox next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonofaRoache Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 Lol at people who think the Sox will do a full rebuild. They are going to rebuild and try to contend at the same time. Meaning they will get the young guys some time and keep a lot of vets. The Cubs winning the WS has all but assured this. The problem isn't that we need to rebuild, we just need to stop bringing in "bargains" hoping to get prime years out of them. Those are the mistakes we keep making that screws us over. Bring in legit talent and a legit 5th starter option and we'll be okay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:50 AM) pls subdivide by hero status thx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 08:23 AM) I expect them to rebuild and trade off some pieces. I would be stunned if they signed a FA with a QO attached though. I don't think it happens but I could see the Lind/Alvarez, Jason Castro, CF offseason again. I'd actually sign Jason Castro regardless if they deal off some guys. His pitch framing is an asset for a rebuilding or contending team. I think Castro is going to be WAY more expensive than people are prepared for - just from supply and demand. There are 4 catchers on the list available this year who had positive fWAR last year - in decreasing order, Wieters, Castro, Avila, Suzuki. I count 4 teams that would be interested in or need a new catcher...in the AL Central alone. If you've got an otherwise playoff caliber team, Castro is the 2nd best catcher option on the FA market. Wouldn't you pay a premium for that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (SonofaRoache @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 09:00 AM) Lol at people who think the Sox will do a full rebuild. They are going to rebuild and try to contend at the same time. Meaning they will get the young guys some time and keep a lot of vets. The Cubs winning the WS has all but assured this. The problem isn't that we need to rebuild, we just need to stop bringing in "bargains" hoping to get prime years out of them. Those are the mistakes we keep making that screws us over. Bring in legit talent and a legit 5th starter option and we'll be okay. With what, though? That's the thing. What do you use to "bring in legit talent?" After last offseason, there is no reason to believe the Sox will ever pay for a top free agent. They're going from an extreme buyer's market with all the best pieces available in areas of need to an extreme seller's market without any true solutions in positions of need. There's just no f'ing way. And, I hate to say it, but as far as the farm system has come, it simply isn't good enough to be able to outbid other contenders on "legit talent" via trade. If a truly "prime" talent is available, someone else is going to have more to give up. Sure, you may be able to come up with an offer that sounds plausible, but you can't ever come up with one that will end up being the best offer that a team receives. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GZ9...QPwuVrk/pubhtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt3515 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 09:34 AM) I think we should trade for a young catcher of the future and then sign Hank Conger. Who out there would be considered young catcher of the future? I can't imagine many teams wanting to give up one of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 10:23 AM) Who out there would be considered young catcher of the future? I can't imagine many teams wanting to give up one of those. If you're giving up Sale/Quintana/Abreu, that's a position you can target as a high priority. Alternatively you could just leave Collins there, but then you're going to have to be patient with him on the way up because rushing catchers tends to be a bad thing for their ability to handle a pitching staff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Zelig Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 11:31 AM) Teams tend to give up prized assets for the likes of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana. Do you believe both of them will be traded? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 11:44 AM) And to your second point, Collins probably doesn't stay behind the plate given the Sox tendencies. I don't but I do think Sale goes. What do you think is a good package for Sale from Boston, Houston, LA, and NYY? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 I'll be upset if Sale goes, but I care more about the team than I do him. If trading him makes the Sox younger and better, I'm all for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (BigHurt3515 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 10:23 AM) Who out there would be considered young catcher of the future? I can't imagine many teams wanting to give up one of those. I'd be looking at guys like Kevin Plawecki, players who have struggled in the majors but have strong minor league track records and possess a signicant amount of upside. One of the benefits of rebuilding is you can give someone like Plawecki 450 plate appearances and not bat an eye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt3515 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 11:31 AM) Teams tend to give up prized assets for the likes of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana. That didn't really answer my question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 11:44 AM) And to your second point, Collins probably doesn't stay behind the plate given the Sox tendencies. And I may as well point out that I agree with you and I disagree with the move in advance. Leave him back there, give him 2-3 years to work his way up, and see if you can pull together a really good hitting catcher when the team is ready to compete. He'll be in RF up in June next year to save the season because how could a competitive team be falling this far out of the wild card race when we did everything right again? I'll hate it when it happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonofaRoache Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 10:00 AM) With what, though? That's the thing. What do you use to "bring in legit talent?" After last offseason, there is no reason to believe the Sox will ever pay for a top free agent. They're going from an extreme buyer's market with all the best pieces available in areas of need to an extreme seller's market without any true solutions in positions of need. There's just no f'ing way. And, I hate to say it, but as far as the farm system has come, it simply isn't good enough to be able to outbid other contenders on "legit talent" via trade. If a truly "prime" talent is available, someone else is going to have more to give up. Sure, you may be able to come up with an offer that sounds plausible, but you can't ever come up with one that will end up being the best offer that a team receives. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GZ9...QPwuVrk/pubhtml For one we have to draft better when it comes to offensive performance. We seem to only hit with pitchers and then trade them away for hitters. We can sign a Cespesdes or Gordon but we have to pay. If we want talent and to win I'd rather spend a few extra mil on them than a Shields, Laroche or Dunn. We don't need elite talent to win but the talent has to be legit and not a castoff some other team doesn't want. But as I said I am not concerned with the construction of this team as is. This team can win a lot of games if they find a C, CF, and bull pen guy worth a crap. They don't have to be all-stars just competent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 01:18 PM) And I may as well point out that I agree with you and I disagree with the move in advance. Leave him back there, give him 2-3 years to work his way up, and see if you can pull together a really good hitting catcher when the team is ready to compete. He'll be in RF up in June next year to save the season because how could a competitive team be falling this far out of the wild card race when we did everything right again? I'll hate it when it happens. Let's be real, you'd hate anything the Sox do. It won't matter - take it to the bank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 01:21 PM) Let's be real, you'd hate anything the Sox do. It won't matter - take it to the bank. I can come up with a list of things I wouldn't hate, including trading Sale - but you know the correct reply to this? I hate 70 win White Sox teams. Those who don't hate that can be thrilled with the last couple years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted November 4, 2016 Share Posted November 4, 2016 QUOTE (SonofaRoache @ Nov 4, 2016 -> 01:18 PM) For one we have to draft better when it comes to offensive performance. We seem to only hit with pitchers and then trade them away for hitters. We can sign a Cespesdes or Gordon but we have to pay. If we want talent and to win I'd rather spend a few extra mil on them than a Shields, Laroche or Dunn. We don't need elite talent to win but the talent has to be legit and not a castoff some other team doesn't want. But as I said I am not concerned with the construction of this team as is. This team can win a lot of games if they find a C, CF, and bull pen guy worth a crap. They don't have to be all-stars just competent. Right, most of us agree that we could use Cespedes -- but if we weren't willing to pay for him when he was desperate and his market was suppressed, what makes you think we'll pay for him now that he's older and his market is about to be massively inflated? And, conceptually, we all agree we need a C, a CF, and a bullpen arm or two -- but that's kind of the point of this thread: look at that list and see if you can find those guys. Catchers Alex Avila (30) Drew Butera (34) Jason Castro (30) Hank Conger (29) A.J. Ellis (36) Ryan Hanigan (36) Nick Hundley (33) Chris Iannetta (34) Jeff Mathis (34) Dioner Navarro (33) A.J. Pierzynski (40) Wilson Ramos (29) Wilin Rosario (28) Carlos Ruiz (38) — $4.5MM club option with a $500K buyout Jarrod Saltalamacchia (32) Geovany Soto (34) Kurt Suzuki (33) Matt Wieters (31) It's Wilson Ramos, who is coming off a serious injury, and then nothing. Which means Ramos is going to make way too much. Center Fielders Peter Bourjos (30) Michael Bourn (34) Yoenis Cespedes (31) — can opt out of remaining two years, $47.5MM on current contract Coco Crisp (37) Rajai Davis (36) Ian Desmond (31) Dexter Fowler (31) Carlos Gomez (31) Tyler Holt (28) Austin Jackson (30) Jon Jay (32) Alex Presley (31) Logan Schafer (30) Drew Stubbs (32) Total jack. Cespedes isn't even a CF. Ian Desmond? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.