Jose Abreu Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:19 PM) I'm confused...he says he would be surprised if Sale was traded to Boston in a deal centered around Bennintendi. Ok all, he tweeted like 3 conflicting things but he IS predicting Sale to Boston for Benintendi+ and a Frazier extension. He later corrected "would be surprised" to "wouldn't be surprised" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 06:00 PM) I thought that's what I saw. He f***ed his original tweet up so that began the confusion. Yeah fooled me too. Many thanks to hi8is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:35 PM) Yeah fooled me too. Many thanks to hi8is. All good. I expect more confusion if they start shipping players out lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:33 PM) Ok all, he tweeted like 3 conflicting things but he IS predicting Sale to Boston for Benintendi+ and a Frazier extension. He later corrected "would be surprised" to "wouldn't be surprised" Ok. I'm doing school work and just skimming twitter as I saw his original tweet. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:17 PM) My fear is that RH finally talked JR into a rebuild, and JR reluctantly agreed but made it clear that it needs to not take very long. And thus RH may be constrained to try to make the team competitive in two years or something. You can't do what the Cubs did unless ownership is willing to buy into its GM' plans, even if those plans sound painful in the short term. I don't know man. I just know there needs to be patience and not push the envelope too early and try to contend too early. Let guys develop so when you do try to contend, they're ready. I think the Cubs WS helps the patience on the South Side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (WhiteSoxLifer @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 04:31 PM) No he said he thought sale would go to boston and would be centered around Benintendi. He said he wouldnt be surprised if the sox extended Frazier. He first messed up the frazier opinion and correctd it Ahh, I see. It would help if someone would have linked to his corrected tweet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 Sale to Boston for Benintendi, Rodriguez, Swihart, Devers, and Kopech Quintana to Dodgers for Puig, Urias, Verdugo, and Bellinger Abreu and Jones to the Rangers for Mazara, Gallo, and Profar Robertson to the Giants for Beede Eaton to the Cardinals for Piscotty, Reyes, and Perez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coco1997 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:57 PM) Sale to Boston for Benintendi, Rodriguez, Swihart, Devers, and Kopech Quintana to Dodgers for Puig, Urias, Verdugo, and Bellinger Abreu and Jones to the Rangers for Mazara, Gallo, and Profar Robertson to the Giants for Beede Eaton to the Cardinals for Piscotty, Reyes, and Perez These all look like pie in the sky ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 What's the point of extending Frazier if they're tearing everything down? A veteran leadership role perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (coco1997 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:02 PM) These all look like pie in the sky ideas. Do you realize how valuable the Sox players are? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCsoxfan Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:57 PM) Sale to Boston for Benintendi, Rodriguez, Swihart, Devers, and Kopech Quintana to Dodgers for Puig, Urias, Verdugo, and Bellinger Abreu and Jones to the Rangers for Mazara, Gallo, and Profar Robertson to the Giants for Beede Eaton to the Cardinals for Piscotty, Reyes, and Perez Rather keep Quintana than take that deal tbh. Other deals not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 http://www.csnchicago.com/chicago-white-so...rizon-white-sox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 (edited) “We’ve always been focused on putting ourselves in the best position to win,” Hahn said. “At the same time, I think we’re veering away from the standpoint of looking for stopgaps. A lot of what we did in the last few years had been trying to enhance the short-term potential of the club to put ourselves in a position to win immediately. I feel the approach at this point is focusing on longer-term benefits. It doesn’t mean we won’t necessarily be in a good position in 2017. It means that our targets and whatever we’re hoping to accomplish have a little more longer-term fits in nature.” This is the quote that frightens me. Edited November 9, 2016 by iamshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:38 PM) This is the quote that frightens me. What frightens you about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 05:45 PM) What frightens you about it? I should have bolded it...the part about it doesn't mean we won't be in a good position in 2017... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 07:48 PM) I should have bolded it...the part about it doesn't mean we won't be in a good position in 2017... MLB ready players in these trades, or trying to cause more confusion by not fully saying that the Sox are gonna rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 05:55 PM) MLB ready players in these trades, or trying to cause more confusion by not fully saying that the Sox are gonna rebuild. They're gonna try increasing payroll and making the big signings they never did before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 05:55 PM) MLB ready players in these trades, or trying to cause more confusion by not fully saying that the Sox are gonna rebuild. I'm concerned they will target too many mlb-ready players and dilute their returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 We're rebuilding. I'm not worried about that quote in the least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 06:08 PM) We're rebuilding. I'm not worried about that quote in the least. I'm not yet convinced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 09:11 PM) I'm not yet convinced. I mean if Hayes and Merkin are talking about it and Hayes did a CSN podcast for a half hour about it, then I'm a believer. Hayes normally is very tight lipped and doesn't tip things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 06:13 PM) I mean if Hayes and Merkin are talking about it and Hayes did a CSN podcast for a half hour about it, then I'm a believer. Hayes normally is very tight lipped and doesn't tip things. Yeah, but at this point, I am going off of what Hahn is saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 8, 2016 -> 08:18 PM) Yeah, but at this point, I am going off of what Hahn is saying. Yeah those other guys are just guessing off of quotes. Nothing is definite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatchetman Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 I don't believe it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 9, 2016 Share Posted November 9, 2016 Would love to see a full rebuild but I have a difficult time believing that JR will agree to rebuild at the tender age of 80. What scares me is the rumors that JR wants to win which means no rebuild. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if JR finally (after all these years) got his good friend (Alex Rodriguez) to DH for the Sox in '17. This would be a typical JR move. Anyway. I really hope Merkin is right about the Sox looking like they will rebuild. Its been long overdue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts