Southwest Sider Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 (edited) Apparently the guy who broke the Thornburg trade has some info about a potential framework with the Red Sox for Sale. This is the link that was provided but the "source" edited his post to remove the info: http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/view...c&start=570 We're left with either a rumor that was BS, or a rumor that he was told to delete because it wasn't supposed to be leaked. I'm hoping for the latter, because anything that's not supposed to be leaked by another team should only help our team in negotiations. Let this rumor be spread!!! Edited December 6, 2016 by South Sider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 This would be great. Either take Boston's superior offer or force Washington to include Turner. I hope Hahn makes the right choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I've been a member of that forum for a decade. No idea who he is and how credible he is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 He deleted it so I am guessing he found out it was BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YouCanPutItOnTheBoardYES! Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 10:51 AM) He deleted it so I am guessing he found out it was BS. or he deleted it because it was leaked info that wasn't supposed to be posted on a forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southwest Sider Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 10:51 AM) He deleted it so I am guessing he found out it was BS. I was thinking either that, or his source told him to remove the info? I mean, why would he be getting good info about the Thornburg trade and then bad info about a Sale push. I think the source maybe had to backtrack a little bit because this wasn't supposed to be leaked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 10:56 AM) or he deleted it because it was leaked info that wasn't supposed to be posted on a forum. Yet it was ok to post about the other move? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (South Sider @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 10:57 AM) I was thinking either that, or his source told him to remove the info? I mean, why would he be getting good info about the Thornburg trade and then bad info about a Sale push. I think the source maybe had to backtrack a little bit because this wasn't supposed to be leaked. I was thinking its because the two teams are still discussing. The Thornburg post said something along the lines of it being a sure thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 (edited) The response to the Thornburg trade was "And powwow" (or whatever his handle is) strikes again! Apparently that wasn't the first deal he's scooped. Edited December 6, 2016 by iamshack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southwest Sider Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 10:59 AM) I was thinking its because the two teams are still discussing. The Thornburg post said something along the lines of it being a sure thing. Even if they are just discussing, what's the motivation to delete info you have received? If I were a source and I leaked that info, I wouldn't delete the info nearly 2 hours later unless I either found out it was complete BS, or if my "insider" told me to remove the info or something along those lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
username Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 It looks like he deleted the other trade info too? Unless I'm an idiot and just can't find the post. Would seem to indicate the Sale thing might not be BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (Username @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:05 AM) It looks like he deleted the other trade info too? Unless I'm an idiot and just can't find the post. Would seem to indicate the Sale thing might not be BS. Good point. He definitely took it down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I need Devers and ERod as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Moncada, Kopech, Basabe is definitely a good start. I would need Devers and Groome to finish it off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCalSox Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 09:10 AM) I need Devers and ERod as well. Sox likely won't get both Moncada & Devers according to Rosenthal yesterday on the MLB Network. Would imagine a package for sale based around this rumor would be something like Moncada, Kopech, Basabe, Swihart & either a low level bat or pitcher, which frankly seems somewhat light. I liked Travis but that's gone now. If it's me, I make the deal with Nats for Sale & turn Q into something similar I posted about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (SoCalSox @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:14 AM) Sox likely won't get both Moncada & Devers according to Rosenthal yesterday on the MLB Network. Would imagine a package for sale based around this rumor would be something like Moncada, Kopech, Basabe, Swihart & either a low level bat or pitcher, which frankly seems somewhat light. I liked Travis but that's gone now. If it's me, I make the deal with Nats for Sale & turn Q into something similar I posted about. Sam Travis was not traded. Travis Shaw was. We need two headliners. One of Benintendi/Moncada, and Devers. Then three of Kopech, Basabe, Swihart, Rodriguez, and Groome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:17 AM) Sam Travis was not traded. Travis Shaw was. We need two headliners. One of Benintendi/Moncada, and Devers. Then three of Kopech, Basabe, Swihart, Rodriguez, and Groome. Yeah I agree on the first part. One of Benintendi/Moncada, and Devers is a must. I'd think 2 of those said names would be fine and then 1-2 low A ball lottery tickets like Dalbec and Cedrola. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFutureIsNear Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Giolito and Robles > Moncada and Kopech. And if Basabe is the beset 3rd piece Boston will do then no thanks....no idea why people are so caught up in names here. Just because you hadn't heard of Robles before yesterday that doesn't mean he's not a great get for the White Sox. There's a damn good chance that his time next year he will be the new Moncada level prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (TheFutureIsNear @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:22 AM) Giolito and Robles > Moncada and Kopech. And if Basabe is the beset 3rd piece Boston will do then no thanks....no idea why people are so caught up in names here. Just because you hadn't heard of Robles before yesterday that doesn't mean he's not a great get for the White Sox. There's a damn good chance that his time next year he will be the new Moncada level prospect. You don't go from asking for Betts 6 months ago to lowering your price to Moncada or Benintendi + Kopech + Basabe Moncada or Benintendi is a must in a Boston offer + Devers as a mandatory second piece + Groome or Kopech as a third piece + 2 of E Rod/Swihart/Basabe/lower level guys Moncada/Benintendi + Devers + Kopech/Groome + E Rod/Swihart/Basabe/lower level prospects is a fair offer for both sides Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (TheFutureIsNear @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 09:22 AM) Giolito and Robles > Moncada and Kopech. And if Basabe is the beset 3rd piece Boston will do then no thanks....no idea why people are so caught up in names here. Just because you hadn't heard of Robles before yesterday that doesn't mean he's not a great get for the White Sox. There's a damn good chance that his time next year he will be the new Moncada level prospect. Kopech did completely dominate the AFL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:26 AM) You don't go from asking for Betts 6 months ago to lowering your price to Moncada or Benintendi + Kopech + Basabe Moncada or Benintendi is a must in a Boston offer + Devers as a mandatory second piece + Groome or Kopech as a third piece + 2 of E Rod/Swihart/Basabe/lower level guys Moncada/Benintendi + Devers + Kopech/Groome + E Rod/Swihart/Basabe/lower level prospects is a fair offer for both sides You don't go from asking for Betts 6 months ago to lowering your price to This is no ones fault but Hahns. That is nonsensical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (hi8is @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:29 AM) Kopech did completely dominate the AFL Jared miller in the Diamondbacks system totally dominated the AFL 18 innings pitched, 0.00 ERA, 6 hits, 4 walks, 30 K's He's their #28 ranked prospect...don't read too much into AFL stats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 1m1 minute ago Sources: #RedSox remain strongly in mix for #WhiteSox’s Sale, along with #Nationals. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southwest Sider Posted December 6, 2016 Author Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (ChicagoHeel @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:41 AM) Ken Rosenthal @Ken_Rosenthal 1m1 minute ago Sources: #RedSox remain strongly in mix for #WhiteSox’s Sale, along with #Nationals. Mark Zuckerman @MarkZuckerman 4m4 minutes ago Mark Zuckerman Retweeted Ken Rosenthal Boston always figured to be the most serious pursuer of Sale along with #Nats... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 QUOTE (South Sider @ Dec 6, 2016 -> 11:46 AM) Mark Zuckerman @MarkZuckerman 4m4 minutes ago Mark Zuckerman Retweeted Ken Rosenthal Boston always figured to be the most serious pursuer of Sale along with #Nats... Always thought Astros would be in, but hey, we are now where I wanted us to be except no Dodgers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.