Jerksticks Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 Interesting how Glasnow and Kingham and Hansen are still somewhat in the talks. These were the big 3 we discussed ad nauseum for Peavy. None really impacted MLB yet. Hansen nosedive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 01:02 PM) Interesting how Glasnow and Kingham and Hansen are still somewhat in the talks. These were the big 3 we discussed ad nauseum for Peavy. None really impacted MLB yet. Hansen nosedive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRIRO2017 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 IT IS WEDNESDAY!!! Lol calm down bra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:01 PM) If you're focusing on SIERA, Carlos Rodon posted the 25th best SIERA in the majors leagues in 2016...very interesting I think it does a better job of isolating the pitcher from all other factors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 Random question, but how come some names at the bottom where it says how many users are viewing and how many are members are in red or yellow? Is it like admin status and non-admin? What does yellow mean? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:02 PM) Interesting how Glasnow and Kingham and Hansen are still somewhat in the talks. These were the big 3 we discussed ad nauseum for Peavy. None really impacted MLB yet. Hansen nosedive Exactly. Which is kind of scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:09 PM) Random question, but how come some names at the bottom where it says how many users are viewing and how many are members are in red or yellow? Is it like admin status and non-admin? What does yellow mean? lol The type of moderator. If you click on their names it says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:09 PM) Exactly. Which is kind of scary. Not too scary. Were they drafted out of high school? We are only talking 3 seasons ago really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (BRIRO2017 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 01:05 PM) Lol calm down bra You hath no idea to what you speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRIRO2017 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 You hath no idea to what you speak. Lol I'm here. I do wait... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:11 PM) Not too scary. Were they drafted out of high school? We are only talking 3 seasons ago really. Hansen's value is way down since then. He has regressed and is a mid tier prospect, at best, right now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (BRIRO2017 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 01:16 PM) Lol I'm here. I do wait... Case in point. ^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:16 PM) Hansen's value is way down since then. He has regressed and is a mid tier prospect, at best, right now I think their names have only come up as final 4th pieces though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 02:12 PM) Rank your trade partners: Yankees Pirates Rockies Rangers Astros It depends on the top player involved. Houston would be #1 if Bregman was involved. They fall down the list if not. If we are getting the top position player prospect from each team? Houston NYY LAD Colorado Pittsburgh I don't see us as much of a match for Texas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 The tone of this article sounds all too familiar. As a Sox fan I've had that feeling once or twice. http://www.post-gazette.com/sports/sean-ge...es/201612210195 It's easy to see why Pirates fans are more sensible in what they would be willing to give up for Q and that they recognize how good Q really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:18 PM) It depends on the top player involved. Houston would be #1 if Bregman was involved. They fall down the list if not. If we are getting the top position player prospect from each team? Houston NYY LAD Colorado Pittsburgh I don't see us as much of a match for Texas. You don't like Meadows as a headliner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRIRO2017 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 Case in point. ^ Don't get me hot.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:18 PM) It depends on the top player involved. Houston would be #1 if Bregman was involved. They fall down the list if not. If we are getting the top position player prospect from each team? Houston NYY LAD Colorado Pittsburgh I don't see us as much of a match for Texas. Wow I'm shocked you view Meadows that poorly. For me it's Bregman/Meadows/Torres/Bellinger/Rodgers in that order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 I'd rather Nancy Reagan the Yankees offer since it will have to involve Torres and I don't want the stress of rooting for a cubs prospect because I still want them all to fail. Ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Jerksticks @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 04:27 PM) I'd rather Nancy Reagan the Yankees offer since it will have to involve Torres and I don't want the stress of rooting for a cubs prospect because I still want them all to fail. Ugh. Please tell me this is an autocorrect fail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:28 PM) Please tell me this is an autocorrect fail? Phenomenal either way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (BRIRO2017 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 01:22 PM) Don't get me hot.. Is that a 1950's movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox59 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:22 PM) You don't like Meadows as a headliner? I do. But I like what the top player in each deal, plus the depth of the other teams have to offer looks like too. I like Bregman as the top player to get, which is why Houston first. NYY is loaded with position player prospects. I think in a year we look back on Torres the way that Bregman and Benetendi are now. They could load up a deal with tons of position players. The Dodgers are loaded with hitters. I'd love to get a lot of their top position players, plus they have some great catching depth too, which is a big thing for me. Rockies have some great position prospects at the top, plus some good ones down their list, plus (again) catching that could go into a deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 03:29 PM) I do. But I like what the top player in each deal, plus the depth of the other teams have to offer looks like too. I like Bregman as the top player to get, which is why Houston first. NYY is loaded with position player prospects. I think in a year we look back on Torres the way that Bregman and Benetendi are now. They could load up a deal with tons of position players. The Dodgers are loaded with hitters. I'd love to get a lot of their top position players, plus they have some great catching depth too, which is a big thing for me. Rockies have some great position prospects at the top, plus some good ones down their list, plus (again) catching that could go into a deal. Pitt also has a pretty intriguing catcher in Diaz as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 21, 2016 -> 01:28 PM) Please tell me this is an autocorrect fail? Pretty sure he just says no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts