Real Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 I don't see how the Astros can beat what we got for Eaton without including Bregman, by looking at their minor league player rankings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Not much other than what we know. Astros need that last piece and have the prospects to get Quintana. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox1917 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Real @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 07:40 PM) I don't see how the Astros can beat what we got for Eaton without including Bregman, by looking at their minor league player rankings Reed/Martes/Tucker would do it for me personally. I love Reed & Tucker, but I know some here don't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 I would definitely want Tucker back. No exceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMule2545 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox1917 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:45 PM) Reed/Martes/Tucker would do it for me personally. I love Reed & Tucker, but I know some here don't I'd be ecstatic too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox1917 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:45 PM) Reed/Martes/Tucker would do it for me personally. I love Reed & Tucker, but I know some here don't that isn't better than what we got for eaton, they're highly ranked but this is Quintana here. Astros just don't seem like a good return imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMule2545 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:46 PM) I would definitely want Tucker back. No exceptions. 100% must or bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:27 PM) I was optimistic. I let everyone talk me into the rebuild. Now I fully expect to be disappointed. This is still better than treading water for 75 wins a year last few years. Rebuild off too a great start, Sox finally have picked a lane. Edited December 8, 2016 by Soxfest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KMule2545 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Real @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:47 PM) that isn't better than what we got for eaton, they're highly ranked but this is Quintana here. Astros just don't seem like a good return imo Kyle Tucker has the potential to be a better hitter than Collins or Moncada. Seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Soxfest @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:48 PM) This is still better than treading water for 75 wins a year last few years. Rebuild off too a great start. If we don't get position players, 75 wins is going to be a successful season for this franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Astros major depth in their farm is in their lower leagues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananarchy Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:48 PM) If we don't get position players, 75 wins is going to be a successful season for this franchise. So, at worst, we're no worse off than we were before. Except, we're likely to be a lot worse, which is better for the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:48 PM) If we don't get position players, 75 wins is going to be a successful season for this franchise. I think you will see position players in next few deals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (ChiSox1917 @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:45 PM) Reed/Martes/Tucker would do it for me personally. I love Reed & Tucker, but I know some here don't I've been reciting the same package, but with Stubbs included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFutureIsNear Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) Astros have a ton of hitting prospects. Don't know how their system wouldn't excite anyone, with or without Bergman. Tucker Reed Cameron Teoscar Hernandez Derek Fisher Ramon Laureano Garrett Stubbs If we can get any 3 of those position players + any 1 of Martes, Whitley, Paulino, Musgrove, or Franklin Perez I'm a happy camper honestly. Realistic offer? Tucker, Reed, Laureano/Stubbs and Paulino/Perez? Pick your preference on the last 2. Edited December 8, 2016 by TheFutureIsNear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) I honestly think the Quintana deal would be done if the Sox were willing to back off Bregman. I think the Stros need to offer him up or they aren't getting Q. Edited December 8, 2016 by iamshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (TheFutureIsNear @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:51 PM) Astros have a ton of hitting prospects. Don't know how their system wouldn't excite anyone, with or without Bergman. Tucker Reed Cameron Teoscar Hernandez Derek Fisher Ramon Laureano Garrett Stubbs If we can get any 3 of those position players + any 1 of Martes, Whitley, Paulino, Musgrove, or Franklin Perez I'm a happy camper honestly. Realistic offer? Tucker, Reed, Laureano/Stubbs and Paulino/Perez? Pick your preference on the last 2. I'd aim for a bigger return than that. Quintana should return nearly the same value as sale did, especially due to the fourth year of control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 I'm gona look at the Rockies. They could be sneaky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 04:56 PM) I'm gona look at the Rockies. They could be sneaky Would much prefer them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) One of the guys on MLBN...no idea what his name is(guy on the far right). Said the White Sox have 2 more moves they are working on. We'll see if they get them done in the next day or two. Edited December 8, 2016 by Baron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 07:57 PM) One of the guys on MLBN...no idea what his name is(guy on the far right). Said the White Sox have 2 more moves they are working on. We'll see if they get them done in the next day or two. Millar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 06:58 PM) Millar? I believe so yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 04:57 PM) One of the guys on MLBN...no idea what his name is(guy on the far right). Said the White Sox have 2 more moves they are working on. We'll see if they get them done in the next day or two. He doesn't know anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Friday Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 QUOTE (SouthSideSale @ Dec 7, 2016 -> 07:56 PM) I'm gona look at the Rockies. They could be sneaky Rumors they may look to move an OF to make room for Trumbo. Side note: trumbo in coors would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Posted December 8, 2016 Share Posted December 8, 2016 Yeah I don't think Millar was meaning to convey any inside information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts