Chicago White Sox Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 Who is everyone’s top four right now? I’m hoping one of Singer or De Sedas makes it to #4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggsmaggs Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 Mize is my favorite prospect in the class, but he has serious health issues that probably force the White Sox away from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenericUserName Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 My top four are probably Brady Singer, Ethan Hankins, Nander De Sedas, and Jarred Kelenic. I feel like mlbpipeline was lower on a couple of the last two's tools than I have seen others. Kelenis probably has higher than 50 power and almost definitely more than 55 speed. De Sedas was given 40 speed when the worst I heard before was that he was going to end up average. Those two probably have the highest potential of position players though. For the pitchers, Singer looks like the safe bet to be a pretty good pitcher. Hankins meanwhile has superstar potential. Good movement on a fastball that is probably major league ready and I like how he switches up his delivery to throw hitter off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 Man, if we could get Beer or Joe Gray Jr with our 2nd pick...that would be sexy AF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominikk85 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) New mlb.com list http://m.mlb.com/news/article/262831302/ml...prospects-list/ Surprised they have it so pitching heavy, they don't seem to love the hitters of the class. I don't think that 4 out of the top5 go pitching though, even if the hitters are not super exciting. Especially surprised no college Bat in top10. I get it is not a super exciting class for college bats but while they may have less upside the bust risk is also much lower than high school hitters or pitchers. I'm sure some teams in the top10 will consider that and prefer lower risk (and faster ETA) bumping up some of the college bats who have a good year late. Edited December 5, 2017 by GermanSock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) Top 4 right now: Ethan Hankins Nander De Sedas Nolan Gorman Brice Turang I haven't watched much of Liberatore yet, but from the little I watched yesterday, he looks like a pretty nice prospect as well. He might bump someone off this list for me. Edited December 5, 2017 by Dunt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 QUOTE (Dunt @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 09:05 AM) Top 4 right now: Ethan Hankins Nander De Sedas Nolan Gorman Brice Turang I haven't watched much of Liberatore yet, but from the little I watched yesterday, he looks like a pretty nice prospect as well. He might bump someone off this list for me. Madrigal seems to be underrated due to his size, but the guy can hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (GermanSock @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 07:00 AM) New mlb.com list http://m.mlb.com/news/article/262831302/ml...prospects-list/ Surprised they have it so pitching heavy, they don't seem to love the hitters of the class. I don't think that 4 out of the top5 go pitching though, even if the hitters are not super exciting. Especially surprised no college Bat in top10. I get it is not a super exciting class for college bats but while they may have less upside the bust risk is also much lower than high school hitters or pitchers. I'm sure some teams in the top10 will consider that and prefer lower risk (and faster ETA) bumping up some of the college bats who have a good year late. Doesn’t seem to be a ton of separation in this draft, but looks like we will end up adding another top 100 overall prospect to our system at #4 overall right away. High school talent is ranked higher than college tallest for now. These lists always dramatically change by draft day. Casey Mize is a player I have read up on and like. Players that can dominate in the SEC (best conference in NCAA) have a solid track record of success. The only thing holding him back are a few injury issues. Edited December 5, 2017 by steveno89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunt Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 08:14 AM) Madrigal seems to be underrated due to his size, but the guy can hit. He has absolutely no power though, and if he's going to be 2B only, I need some power out of him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 Jim CallisVerified account @jimcallisMLB 2h2 hours ago Jim Callis Retweeted MLB Pipeline At this stage, this @MLBDraft crop appears at be the best since 2011. Not as good as that deep group, but best since then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 QUOTE (Dunt @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 10:13 AM) He has absolutely no power though, and if he's going to be 2B only, I need some power out of him Scouts think he has the ability to play SS, just hasn't to be a good team player. I'd be okay with him becoming the 2014 or 2015 version of Jose Altuve or a 2007-2009 Dustin Pedroia. There's also the chance that, like Altuve, he suddenly develops power in his prime. I'd be happy with he, De Sedas, one of the LHSPs, or Gorman if the scouting staff thinks highly enough of him to take him that high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted December 5, 2017 Author Share Posted December 5, 2017 QUOTE (GenericUserName @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 09:16 PM) Funny section from a Sullivan Fangraphs chat https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/jeff-sulliv...phs-chat-12117/ I would totally do that trade I'd do that in a heartbeat. You can patch together those innings you're losing and again, it's not like the Sox are playing for anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 12:07 PM) I'd do that in a heartbeat. You can patch together those innings you're losing and again, it's not like the Sox are playing for anything Yeah, you can just bring back Volstad haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 5, 2017 Share Posted December 5, 2017 Jim CallisVerified account @jimcallisMLB 2h2 hours ago Jim Callis Retweeted DJ No because I knew Beer was polarizing after another rough summer with @USABaseballCNT. If you like him, you look at the Clemson number and believe the power plays. If you don't, you wonder how much he'll hit with wood. Offers little beyond the bat. @MLBDraft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GenericUserName Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 MLBPipeline just put out a first 10 picks mock: http://m.mlb.com/news/article/262843418/20...picid=151437456 Callis has us taking De Sedas while De Sedas was already off the board for Mayo who has us taking Jackson Kowar. Both had Singer at #1 and Hankins at #2 or #3, so gone before us. Both also were low on Gorman who they ranked high on the top 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominikk85 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (Dam8610 @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 12:40 PM) Scouts think he has the ability to play SS, just hasn't to be a good team player. I'd be okay with him becoming the 2014 or 2015 version of Jose Altuve or a 2007-2009 Dustin Pedroia. There's also the chance that, like Altuve, he suddenly develops power in his prime. I'd be happy with he, De Sedas, one of the LHSPs, or Gorman if the scouting staff thinks highly enough of him to take him that high. yes, especially with the mlb ball he could develope some Pop and hit 15+ bombs per year eventually. however with his size there is a Chance the power doesn't come and while some think he can Play SS there are not a lot of college SS playing short in the Majors anyway and especially not if they played another Position (most MLB SSs are HS or international Players since the top athletic talents who can Play short and hit usually don't make the Majors). that could drop him out of the top5, although I could see a Team taking him early because there is a low bust potential. the pitchers going high might be a good Thing for the sox who really Need a shortstop prospect since one of turang or de sedas will likely still be on the board when they pick. now they could go with another Player and even a pitcher if they think he is clearly BPA, but if several are perceived similar I think they could go with the organisational Need at SS. Edited December 7, 2017 by GermanSock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
35thstreetswarm Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Dec 5, 2017 -> 08:14 AM) Madrigal seems to be underrated due to his size, but the guy can hit. Madrigal seems like the kind of player who could make a lot of teams look silly for not picking him earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (GermanSock @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 06:30 AM) yes, especially with the mlb ball he could develope some Pop and hit 15+ bombs per year eventually. however with his size there is a Chance the power doesn't come and while some think he can Play SS there are not a lot of college SS playing short in the Majors anyway and especially not if they played another Position (most MLB SSs are HS or international Players since the top athletic talents who can Play short and hit usually don't make the Majors). that could drop him out of the top5, although I could see a Team taking him early because there is a low bust potential. the pitchers going high might be a good Thing for the sox who really Need a shortstop prospect since one of turang or de sedas will likely still be on the board when they pick. now they could go with another Player and even a pitcher if they think he is clearly BPA, but if several are perceived similar I think they could go with the organisational Need at SS. Sox are probably looking for an up the middle high school talent, but I wouldn't rule out them selecting a college arm that could potentially fast track to the majors either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 At this point I would be fine with absolutely any position as long as they aren't picked because of their athleticism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted December 7, 2017 Author Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (cjgalloway @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 11:44 AM) At this point I would be fine with absolutely any position as long as they aren't picked because of their athleticism. Always take BPA but the Sox system desperately lacks athletes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGajewski18 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 01:34 PM) Always take BPA but the Sox system desperately lacks athletes That's what we drafted before in Courtney Hawkins, Keenyn Walker, Jared Mitchell, look at how that has turned out. Not saying I don't want great athletes in the system, but give me the good baseball player who knows how to hit a ball very well and competent on defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 If those players aren't that athletic though we'll just end up with a bunch of corner infield types that all need to have tremendous bats to be valuable. A lot of really good baseball players are really athletic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 03:05 PM) That's what we drafted before in Courtney Hawkins, Keenyn Walker, Jared Mitchell, look at how that has turned out. Not saying I don't want great athletes in the system, but give me the good baseball player who knows how to hit a ball very well and competent on defense. We have athletes in guys like Tim Anderson and Yoan Moncada too. It is way too simplistic to just say no athletes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxJon Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 04:22 PM) We have athletes in guys like Tim Anderson and Yoan Moncada too. It is way too simplistic to just say no athletes. While Anderson was very raw...I think Mitchell and Walker were primarily speed guys and still think that Achilles injury f***ed Mitchell...Hawkins just never came along...too raw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boopa1219 Posted December 7, 2017 Author Share Posted December 7, 2017 QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Dec 7, 2017 -> 03:05 PM) That's what we drafted before in Courtney Hawkins, Keenyn Walker, Jared Mitchell, look at how that has turned out. Not saying I don't want great athletes in the system, but give me the good baseball player who knows how to hit a ball very well and competent on defense. The organization and its infrastructure have changed a lot since then, let's not ignore that fact. And just because those guys didn't work out it doesn't mean that they should avoid 'athletes'. Using your logic, the Sox shouldn't go after any left-handed power hitters because Adam Dunn and Adam LaRoche didn't work out. That's not smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts