Jump to content

2017 Democratic Thread


bmags

Recommended Posts

uRl1EVc.jpg

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-na...d&tid=sm_tw

Officials in Kansas are scrambling to keep weapons out of state hospitals — including psychiatric facilities — four years after passing a law to allow them.

 

A 2013 bill expanded gun laws in Kansas by allowing concealed firearms in state and municipal buildings, while also giving a four-year exemption to public colleges and hospitals. But that exemption expires July 1.

 

So for hospitals to be able to continue banning guns, lawmakers must either pass a new law making that exemption permanent — or implement costly security measures.

 

Under the 2013 law, facilities can still ban weapons after July 1 if they meet certain security requirements, such as installing metal detectors and hiring full-time armed security guards. But those measures would cost millions.

 

Thomasset, whose organization represents 26 community mental-health centers, echoed Keck in recent Senate committee testimony, saying that such centers “by statute … must treat every person who walks through the door; so if an individual who is in crisis walks through our door carrying a concealed weapon, that situation presents a dangerous scenario not only to our staff, but also for other patients seeking treatment.”

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Frelinghuysen Targets Activist in Letter to Her Employer

 

“It’s certainly troubling," Libowitz said. "Whether or not it breaks a criminal statute is one issue, but the very clear issue is that it appears that a member of Congress might be using his power to threaten someone’s employment because of their political activities.”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ May 15, 2017 -> 02:49 PM)
https://twitter.com/davidafrench/status/864204557785726977

 

NYT faces facts on the "gender gap"

 

If anyone wants to read the actual article NYT article (the one quoted is from National Review and is merely an opinion piece) and not the one that attacks people for no reason:

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/13/upshot/t...rhood.html?_r=0

 

Also the article by the National Review does not accurately portray the NYT article.

Edited by Soxbadger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ May 16, 2017 -> 09:13 PM)
Right wing media has been exploiting the death of a DNC staffer last year with insane conspiracy theories to distract from Trump's s*** show, family calling in them to stop.

 

https://twitter.com/KaivanShroff/status/864470917816213504

 

It's Vince Foster all over again...or Colombian drug runners' jets filling the skies and all queued up to land at Mena, Arkansas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://money.cnn.com/2017/05/16/media/seth...tact/index.html

UNFORTUNATELY THE WHOLE SETH RICH MURDER STORY COMPLETELY FELL APART (anyone not in conspiracy-land surprised???)

 

 

 

 

http://www.thefringenews.com/murdered-dnc-...aker-confirmed/

 

PROOF THAT ROBBIE MOOK IS THE PREMEDITATED MURDERER...INDICT MOOK AND CLINTON!!!! LOCK HER UP

This is REALLY the best rebuttal that FOX NEWS and the Trump admin can come up with???

 

While we're at it, can they please lock up Roger Ailes and Bill O'Reilly, too?

 

 

 

Following Wheeler's claims, Rich's family have distanced themselves from the investigator who they are said to have hired.

 

"As we 've seen through the past year of unsubstantiated claims, we see no facts, we have no evidence, we have been approached with no emails and only learned about this when contacted by the press," they said in a statement.

 

"Even if tomorrow, an email was found, it is not a high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions as emails can be altered and we've seen that those interested in pushing conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so.

 

"We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law enforcement and the general public from finding Seth's murderers.

 

"The services of the private investigator who spoke to the press was offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and contractually was barred from speaking to the press or anyone outside of law enforcement or the family unless explicitly authorised by the family."

 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/investigator-clai...-230645963.html

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FREE SETH RICH!!!

Apparently he was spotted at the Ecuadorian Embassy compound in London sometime over the last 24-48 hours.

 

Stay tuned for further details from Alex Jones and The Drudge Report. Free Totino's mini pizza's to the first 10 callers.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ May 17, 2017 -> 12:37 AM)
Because the left wing outlets had no incentive to speak on the reports from Rich's family's private investigator that Rich had been in contact with WikiLeaks.

 

Stop following conspiratorial right wing media.

 

His family didn't hire anyone, conservative media did. And that person didn't actually do any investigating but just relied on Fox news claims that he was in contact with WikiLeaks.

 

The family is disgusted with this and has asked the right wing media to stop exploiting their son's death. I posted a link to their statement several hours before you made your first post.

 

this is just Phase 3 & 4 of this:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/how-...DjEj#.iuOP96EVE

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's just let this end it:

Earlier Tuesday, Brad Bauman, a spokesman for the Rich family, released a statement in which he said the family had "seen no evidence" to suggest Seth Rich had been in contact with Wikileaks.

Bauman told CNN the outlets that had run with the story "have shown over and over again that they are willing to lie and manipulate the facts" to further "their own political end."

"I think it's important for everyone at Fox News to be careful with this information and how this story breaks because using the legacy of a murder victim in such an overtly political way is morally reprehensible," he said.

Bauman also said the Rich family was reviewing possible legal action against Wheeler for speaking about the case publicly. A contract between Wheeler and the Rich family prohibited Wheeler from speaking to the media about his ongoing investigation, Bauman said.

 

That fox (local fox) story was ridiculous hearsay from the start, interviewing this "former law officer" who said he may have heard from someone who heard from an officer that they found emails from wikileaks on his laptop. Except that police dept didn't have the laptop. He is not a PI hired by the family. And he heard about it from the TV.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good work from Williamson at NRO (with a typical penultimate paragraph to make sure we knew we were reading National Review):

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4476...be-acknowledged

For conservatives, hating the media is a reflex, and sometimes a funny one: Speaking on his “Morning Minute,” Sean Hannity once read breathlessly from an Associated Press report on a federal surveillance program, ending with the instinctual harrumph: “The mainstream media won’t tell you about that!” There is no media more mainstream than the Associated Press, which is a nonprofit cooperative owned by its member newspapers, television networks, and radio stations. Its reports appear in practically every daily newspaper in the United States, and big scoops like the one that caught Hannity’s eye routinely lead front pages from sea to shining sea. The Associated Press has bias problems and some notable competency problems, and, like any organization that does any substantive reporting, it makes errors. But it does not, for the most part, traffic in fiction.

 

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4476...be-acknowledged

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next best conspiracy theory for Fox to cover while Trump's not tweeting and flying to the Coast Guard Academy in Connecticut for a speech???

 

Congress passing a law that newspapers in the US can no longer use anonymous sources?

Capital punishment for leaking?

 

The best Drudge could come up with is this from People Magazine.

 

“He’s nothing but a bullsh–ter,” Obama told two friends early last November, describing an election night phone call with Trump, in which the businessman suddenly professed his “respect” and “admiration” for Obama—after years of hectoring.

 

Speaking to PEOPLE for its new cover story on Obama and his wife Michelle adjusting to life outside the White House, the two friends quoted Obama’s blunt assessment of President-elect Trump. And how has Obama’s opinion changed since Trump been in office? “Well,” said one of the sources, “it hasn’t gotten any better.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ May 17, 2017 -> 08:00 AM)
Let's just let this end it:

 

 

That fox (local fox) story was ridiculous hearsay from the start, interviewing this "former law officer" who said he may have heard from someone who heard from an officer that they found emails from wikileaks on his laptop. Except that police dept didn't have the laptop. He is not a PI hired by the family. And he heard about it from the TV.

 

Or not...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-stands-dnc-m...-001103315.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ May 17, 2017 -> 09:00 AM)
Let's just let this end it:

 

 

That fox (local fox) story was ridiculous hearsay from the start, interviewing this "former law officer" who said he may have heard from someone who heard from an officer that they found emails from wikileaks on his laptop. Except that police dept didn't have the laptop. He is not a PI hired by the family. And he heard about it from the TV.

 

His family has now sent a cease and desist letter

 

https://t.co/kb7X230frS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats still divided on health care, Clinton/Perez vs. Sanders/Ellison split

 

The rift within the Democratic Party was on full display at the California Democratic Party Convention on May 19 in Sacramento, California. Progressives joined members of National Nurses United, protesting the Democratic Party establishment’s refusal to support single payer healthcare system. Rather than follow through with Democratic rhetoric that healthcare is a human right, establishment Democrats have responded to voters by scolding and attacking them.

 

During the first day of the convention, California Democratic Party chair John Burton yelled at protesting nurses to “shut the f*ck up and go outside.” Burton condescendingly told the protesters, “There’s [sic] some people who have been fighting for that issue before you guys were born.”

 

The California Democratic establishment, like the national party leadership, has favored corporate and wealthy donors, undermining pushes for a single payer healthcare system that would provide Americans with healthcare—not just health insurance. Eric Bauman, the California Democratic Party vice chair and candidate to succeed Burton as the Party’s chair, received $12,500 a month from the pharmaceutical industry to fight proposition 61, which would “cap the price that any state agency or care program could spend on prescription drugs at what the federal Department of Veterans Affairs pays.” Bauman received these payments while earning a six-figure salary as an adviser to California Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon. Proposition 61 failed to pass in November 2016 after the pharmaceutical industry spent millions of dollars opposing it.

 

http://observer.com/2017/05/tom-perez-cali...on/amp/?ref=yfp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to imagine Handel winning...it's largely a referendum on the past two weeks for Trump, sliding poll numbers nationally and antipathy to the AHCA that Price was the architect of, along with Ryan.

 

Btw, if we listed all the lawsuits against Trump, subpoenas, newspaper FOIA requests, injunctions...SoxTalk would simply implode due to all the character space it would require.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ May 22, 2017 -> 05:57 PM)
Hard to imagine Handel winning...it's largely a referendum on the past two weeks for Trump, sliding poll numbers nationally and antipathy to the AHCA that Price was the architect of, along with Ryan.

 

Btw, if we listed all the lawsuits against Trump, subpoenas, newspaper FOIA requests, injunctions...SoxTalk would simply implode due to all the character space it would require.

As someone currently working on the campaign and speaking with staff on the ground regularly, she could still easily win. Ossoff winning this race has been a massive uphill battle, and will continue to be so, regardless of the media hype. This is a heavily, heavily red district. That said, this new poll is encouraging, because it was done by an extremely reliable pollster who actually underestimated Ossoff's vote share in the primary.

 

Fortunately, Handel was/is the weakest candidate against Ossoff in the runoff, and for that reason I was extremely happy to see her win the primary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...