Jump to content

2017 Republican Thread


bmags

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:32 PM)
These conclusions you draw have no basis in reality. I simply stated her occupation and my reaction to unfortunately coming upon pictures of her work on Reddit. If that's what you're into no worries but me personally, I had a visceral reaction to seeing her work.

You simply stated her supposed occupation because you thought it made her look bad. The same move has been made a million times before.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 718
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:34 PM)
Damn straight. Dick or p****, you go after someone looking for a fight, you get a fight. What if she had a weapon? Would he have been OK to hit her then? What if he was a gay black social worker instead of a white guy with bad politics? Antifa has a history of putting its female members up front and hiding behind them so that when they get hit in the ensuing clashes they can cry to the media about hot a woman got hit. Screw that, they are there for a fight. They got a fight.

She had no weapon and the tough guy ran away once he punched her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:38 PM)
Fists are weapons, your point is moot.

Wow. Are you really so worried about being punched by a 120 pound girl, you would punch her in the face first, then run away?

 

If you are going to run away anyway and are that scared, why not run before she has a shot at you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:41 PM)
Wow. Are you really so worried about being punched by a 120 pound girl, you would punch her in the face first, then run away?

 

If you are going to run away anyway and are that scared, why not run before she has a shot at you?

You are assuming he wasn't running to hit someone else. Nice try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:40 PM)
You are continuing to make these conclusions for me in your own head. You don't speak for me. If I could do the same to you, it seems you don't have respect for porn workers and are offended someone on your team looks bad after causing a ruckus and facing the music.

I don't speak for you but it is obvious why you posted she did porn. We aren't that stupid. I couldn't care less if she was a porn actress, drug dealer, doctor, teacher, stay at home mom, bank robber, what happened to her was wrong, and I hope the perp spends some time in jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:34 PM)
Damn straight. Dick or p****, you go after someone looking for a fight, you get a fight. What if she had a weapon? Would he have been OK to hit her then? What if he was a gay black social worker instead of a white guy with bad politics? Antifa has a history of putting its female members up front and hiding behind them so that when they get hit in the ensuing clashes they can cry to the media about hot a woman got hit. Screw that, they are there for a fight. They got a fight.

 

 

Lmao. Wut?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:45 PM)
Wow and now you're just going to assume her gender? Even if she does actually identify as a woman, you're saying she's not equal to one that identifies a man?

Maybe it's old fashioned, but I was always told to never hit a female, and I never did.

 

You have lost your mind. Seriously. I doubt if someone asked you if your girlfriend was a guy you would be understanding.

 

The guy you are defending is a white supremacist btw, who has done time for armed robbery of a cab driver, and has some pretty messed up views which I suppose you will tell us you don't necessarily agree with but argue against anyone who says they are messed up. Unsettling. Kind of surprised you never mentioned it.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:03 PM)
I was doing your sarcasm thing. Apparently you can dish it out but can't take it.

 

You show me one post where I defend this white supremacist guy and I'll buy you a car. Show me one post where I even acknowledge his existence. You're full of it. Back up your claim here. Here's your chance to show you're not full of it.

You didn't acknowledge his existence, yet you wanted to make sure everyone knew his victim did porn. See what I'm getting at? What he did was somehow irrelevant, what she did, because it wasn't something you thought was noble, was pertinent .

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 12:59 PM)
That was a joke post but now I'm really curious as to whether you actually believe there's no such thing as an "unarmed" person

I know it was a joke, but your mocking tone suggested that there is no basis for fists being weapons. They can be. She was there to get into a fight. She got into a fight. her being a porn star doesn't matter in that, him being some white supremacist doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:07 PM)
I know it was a joke, but your mocking tone suggested that there is no basis for fists being weapons. They can be. She was there to get into a fight. She got into a fight. her being a porn star doesn't matter in that, him being some white supremacist doesn't matter.

 

I dunno, I think him being a white supremacist is relevant since it's the reason both of them were there in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:09 PM)
Did I defend him or not acknowledge his existence? I think those claims run at odds. You're losing control here. Show me the post I defended him. Back your claims up.

You went after the victim. It's what defense attorneys do. Shame the victim.

 

I can back up my claims by saying read your posts.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 11:15 AM)
From the first page of the United Thread. BigSqwert "shames" the victim by stating his occupation. Get em DA!

 

By stating his occupation, I gave context to why he would not volunteer to give up his seat. He had patients to see in the morning.

 

What did outing that lady as a porn actress achieve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:15 PM)
From the first page of the United Thread. BigSqwert "shames" the victim by stating his occupation. Get em DA!

For the love of God you are off the rails.

 

For the last time, everyone knows why you posted her occupation.

 

YOU WANTED TO MAKE HER LOOK BAD

 

If she was a doctor, you never would have mentioned it. If she was curing cancer, you never would have mentioned it. If she were a banker, you never would have mentioned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:31 PM)
Why don't you stop making conclusions for me back up your baseless claims with proof.

 

By the way, I love the big letters. I would have gone all caps first and saved the bigger font for later but you really showed how angry you are. Bravo. Now use those big letters to back your claim of me defending a white supremicist. Or were you just trying to malign my character because you couldn't articulate an argument to negate my point. Prove that your words actually have weight and that you didn't just opt to get personal (based on events that haven't happened) when your argument didn't work. Back your words up or admit you were wrong.

You said her Inglourious Basterds quote showed she was looking for violence so we shouldn't feel too bad, then compared it to Trumps grabbing women by the p****. Of course Trump claimed he did do that. She had no weapons or anything to "scalp" these people. Hey they are just words right? Look at the video she has open hands when this guy is loading up, and she tries to grab his arms to defend herself. Then after that let everyone know the "unsettling" news this woman also did porn, which according to another post posed questions about her character. Never once mentioning the character of the punchee.

 

Why don't you just say what happened to her was wrong and should never have happened, and you hope this person that did this is punished severely? It isn't democrat vs. republican, left vs right. It's right vs. wrong.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:37 PM)
You said her Inglourious Basterds quote showed she was looking for violence so we shouldn't feel too bad, then compared it to Trumps grabbing women by the p****. Of course Trump claimed he did do that. She had no weapons or anything to "scalp" these people. Hey they are just words right? Look at the video she has open hands when this guy is loading up, and she tries to grab his arms to defend herself. Then after that let everyone know the "unsettling" news this woman also did porn, which according to another post posed questions about her character. Never once mentioning the character of the punchee.

 

Why don't you just say what happened to her was wrong and should never have happened, and you hope this person that did this is punished severely? It isn't democrat vs. republican, left vs right. It's right vs. wrong.

yes, she should have never went there looking to instigate violence. She should be punished severely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:42 PM)
Keep changing the focus DA and taking things I said and misconstruing them with hour own words. I take your exact words and ask you to substantiate them. You defer and the change the focus. You made s*** up and won't back it up. It's that simple. You know it too. There's no post where I mention the guy and you even admit that but you won't admit you lied and you were wrong.

The fact that you won't just come right out and say what happened to the victim was wrong speaks volumes. Sleep well.

 

I also said in a post you never mentioned the puncher, and I asked why wasn't his occupation important. So again you are the one lying.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:48 PM)
In no way do I have to state that hitting a woman is wrong because it's common sense. I don't feel better about my moral standing by stating the obvious like you may. I really hope you don't feel our president has empowered you into thinking that lying is okay. It's not and you shouldn't do it to push your agenda and with hopes you can malign someone's character.

So do you think the guy that punched her should be locked up?

 

I have written zero lies. Since you won't admit your motivation for posting her occupation, the lie o meter is going crazy pointing at you.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:54 PM)
Show me where I defended him. That's a lie if you can't.

 

You positing irrelevant questions at me to get your lies off of the focus does not make me a liar. I won't play interview games with someone who has discourse as cheap as you have displayed. Back up your words or stop trying to drag this on.

Again, I have stated on several occassions you haven't mentioned the guy. I will write it again, you never mentioned him. That alone speaks volumes. What is his occupation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:40 PM)
yes, she should have never went there looking to instigate violence. She should be punished severely.

 

Also, just to be clear on this. This woman never touched the guy who punched her. She didn't grab him or anything.

 

There was a scrum when a group of white supremacist attacked antifa protesters. This dude singled her out, ran up to her and punched her in the face. Then he ran away.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...