Jump to content

President Donald Trump: The Thread


Steve9347

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 12, 2017 -> 03:15 PM)
Trump's flipped on three campaign promises today:

 

-Won't label China a currency manipulator

-Supports the Import-Export Bank

-Calls NATO the "bulwark of international peace" (he had called it obsolete)

And another, former senior White House staffer now going to work as a lobbyist

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles...-lobbying-group

 

Ended up being a grand total of six campaign promises walked back or changed today.

 

https://t.co/KBh33jaU4I

Edited by StrangeSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Conway said she didn't think most journalists had made an adequate effort to understand why Americans elected Trump president and that they hadn't started talking to those people either.

 

"Don't keep getting it wrong by covering the president the way you covered him as a candidate," Conway said. "What's the noise versus what's the news? ... Remember, he's taken dozens and dozens of executive actions, and there's one that's gotten coverage."

 

...

 

"You can turn on the TV ... and people literally say things that just aren't true," she said.

 

The crowd laughed at that, presumably because in February, Conway cited a nonexistent "Bowling Green massacre" as justification for Trump's immigration ban. She later had to clarify she meant to say "terrorists" instead of "massacre," and apologized for her mistake. CNN has since declined to interview Conway in part because of "serious questions about her credibility."

 

 

Maybe because he's STILL running campaign rallies despite already being the elected president?

 

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/im-not-d...-163506998.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/ap...am-links-russia

Britain’s spy agencies played a crucial role in alerting their counterparts in Washington to contacts between members of Donald Trump’s campaign team and Russian intelligence operatives, the Guardian has been told.

 

GCHQ first became aware in late 2015 of suspicious “interactions” between figures connected to Trump and known or suspected Russian agents, a source close to UK intelligence said. This intelligence was passed to the US as part of a routine exchange of information, they added.

 

Over the next six months, until summer 2016, a number of western agencies shared further information on contacts between Trump’s inner circle and Russians, sources said.

 

The European countries that passed on electronic intelligence – known as sigint – included Germany, Estonia and Poland. Australia, a member of the “Five Eyes” spying alliance, which also includes the US, UK, Canada and New Zealand, also relayed material, one source said.

 

Another source suggested the Dutch and the French spy agency, the General Directorate for External Security or DGSE, were contributors.

 

It is understood that GCHQ was at no point carrying out a targeted operation against Trump or his team or proactively seeking information. The alleged conversations were picked up by chance as part of routine surveillance of Russian intelligence assets. Over several months, different agencies targeting the same people began to see a pattern of connections that were flagged to intelligence officials in the US.

 

The Guardian has been told the FBI and the CIA were slow to appreciate the extensive nature of contacts between Trump’s team and Moscow ahead of the US election. This was in part due to US law that prohibits US agencies from examining the private communications of American citizens without warrants. “They are trained not to do this,” the source stressed.

 

“It looks like the [uS] agencies were asleep,” the source added. “They [the European agencies] were saying: ‘There are contacts going on between people close to Mr Trump and people we believe are Russian intelligence agents. You should be wary of this.’

 

“The message was: ‘Watch out. There’s something not right here.’”

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 13, 2017 -> 01:38 PM)
That bomb to blow up a handful of ISIS guys cost $16m but remember there's no money in this country for meals on wheels

It's all part of Trump's brilliant plan to quickly destroy ISIS. He knows way more than any General. He's like really smart. He went to Wharton you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 13, 2017 -> 02:36 PM)
Why is the media hyping this so much? In 2016 the Pentagon averaged 3x the amount of weight of that bomb everyday. And that's a conservative estimate. It's a not a good idea to allow Trump to think the media will be nice to him if he wages war.

 

 

They will be nice to him if he wages war. They will praise him, they already are.

 

See what the media has done the past 20 years for reference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Apr 13, 2017 -> 02:36 PM)
Why is the media hyping this so much? In 2016 the Pentagon averaged 3x the amount of weight of that bomb everyday. And that's a conservative estimate. It's a not a good idea to allow Trump to think the media will be nice to him if he wages war.

 

I think it sets a dangerous precedent. Dropping that type of arsenal does what exactly? Maybe some other countries will feel the need to flex their muscles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's getting some coverage because it's the first use of the "largest noon nuclear bomb ever" and it seems like a weird use of it, but year ultimately if they had dropped the exact same amount of explosives but spread over smaller individual bombs, no one would have noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...