Y2Jimmy0 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 11:36 AM) Please don't tell me people are going to start changing their opinions on potential trade packages solely based on Law's rankings... Oh no definitely not. People on this site have treated Mitch Keller like some throw in though when he'd probably be the headliner. That's the point. If the Pirates were offering Keller, Glasnow and Newman, I think the Sox would have already accepted that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCsoxfan Posted January 27, 2017 Author Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 12:36 PM) Please don't tell me people are going to start changing their opinions on potential trade packages solely based on Law's rankings... People always anchor to things like this, BA100, etc. To some extent it's all we have to go on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSoxFanMike Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 11:37 AM) Oh no definitely not. People on this site have treated Mitch Keller like some throw in though when he'd probably be the headliner. That's the point. If the Pirates were offering Keller, Glasnow and Newman, I think the Sox would have already accepted that. Good. I thought I remembered you asking for more than just those 3 guys a few weeks ago and was hoping that Law's list wouldn't sway your opinion that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 12:02 PM) Good. I thought I remembered you asking for more than just those 3 guys a few weeks ago and was hoping that Law's list wouldn't sway your opinion that much. I've said in the past that I didn't think Pirates could get a Quintana deal without Meadows or Bell. With that being said, if they offered Glasnow, Keller, Newman, and another piece, that'd be pretty tough to turn down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joejoedairy Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 08:35 AM) If that's the case, then he should definitely pass. Newman is not an acceptable second piece unless Meadows is the headliner. Would you take just Meadows and Newman and maybe a lesser pitcher. I think I would, need some hitting prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 QUOTE (joejoedairy @ Jan 27, 2017 -> 02:34 PM) Would you take just Meadows and Newman and maybe a lesser pitcher. I think I would, need some hitting prospects. Probably, as long as the pitching prospect was halfway decent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.