Dick Allen Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 20, 2017 -> 02:59 PM) Bears 2017 Schedule per @BradBiggs Sept 10 Falcons Sept 17 at Bucs Sept 24 Steelers Thu. Sept 28 at Packers Mon. Oct. 9 Vikings Oct. 15 at Ravens Oct. 22 Panthers Oct. 29 at Saints Nov. 5 bye Nov. 12 Packers Nov. 19 Lions Nov. 26 at Eagles Dec. 3 49ers Dec. 10 at Bengals Sat. Dec. 16 at Lions Dec. 24 Browns Dec. 31 at Vikings I predict 5-11 Not a bad schedule. 2 indoor games out of the last 3 is nice. If the Bears suck, the Dec 24 game against the Browns will probably set the record for no shows, and be a stubhub user's delight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 20, 2017 -> 12:59 PM) Bears 2017 Schedule per @BradBiggs Sept 10 Falcons Sept 17 at Bucs Sept 24 Steelers Thu. Sept 28 at Packers Mon. Oct. 9 Vikings Oct. 15 at Ravens Oct. 22 Panthers Oct. 29 at Saints Nov. 5 bye Nov. 12 Packers Nov. 19 Lions Nov. 26 at Eagles Dec. 3 49ers Dec. 10 at Bengals Sat. Dec. 16 at Lions Dec. 24 Browns Dec. 31 at Vikings I predict 5-11 The start of the season is brutal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxfest Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Game at Tampa going to be a hot one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan49 Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Bears will be 1-7 heading into the bye and their 9th game will be coached by Fangio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 20, 2017 -> 02:07 PM) Not a bad schedule. 2 indoor games out of the last 3 is nice. If the Bears suck, the Dec 24 game against the Browns will probably set the record for no shows, and be a stubhub user's delight. Pretty good schedule for a season ticket holder, although it would be much better if the Steelers and Browns were flip flopped. Like you said, That Browns game will make the Redskins one last year look like Woodstock. if you enjoy road games, NOLA in October is wonderful and it's a fun stadium. Tough early schedule for the Bears football wise, But never fear Mike Glennon is here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 I love that fans and media outlets predict the season prior to ANY DRAFT PICKS BEING MADE!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonik22 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 20, 2017 -> 08:07 PM) Pretty good schedule for a season ticket holder, although it would be much better if the Steelers and Browns were flip flopped. Like you said, That Browns game will make the Redskins one last year look like Woodstock. if you enjoy road games, NOLA in October is wonderful and it's a fun stadium. Tough early schedule for the Bears football wise, But never fear Mike Glennon is here! I was looking forward to seeing when the Bears played in Nola because I planned on going to that. Love that place. However...Halloween weekend is the best weekend in New Orleans all year for both tourists and locals. But, hotels are wayyyyyy more expensive so if you can afford it, do it. It's amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 08:36 AM) I love that fans and media outlets predict the season prior to ANY DRAFT PICKS BEING MADE!! Dumbest thing in sports is fans celebrating the NFL schedule release Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 08:36 AM) I love that fans and media outlets predict the season prior to ANY DRAFT PICKS BEING MADE!! Some are very confident in the picks too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Apr 18, 2017 -> 01:15 PM) So do I. Too much smoke. Leming has thought so all along. Greg Gabriel, Moon Mullin, and Jim Miller all have them taking DeShaun Watson at #3. I think they either trade down and take one later or take one in the second round. I don't see them taking a QB at #3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 09:43 AM) I think they either trade down and take one later or take one in the second round. I don't see them taking a QB at #3. All 4 will likely be gone by #36 in my opinion. I'd love to trade back but I'm not sure anyone wants the #3 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 09:45 AM) All 4 will likely be gone by #36 in my opinion. I'd love to trade back but I'm not sure anyone wants the #3 pick. This is always the issue. Hopefully a team gets nervous. If the Bears want to pick one in the 2nd, I think Dobbs or Peterman will be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (ptatc @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:09 AM) This is always the issue. Hopefully a team gets nervous. If the Bears want to pick one in the 2nd, I think Dobbs or Peterman will be there. I don't think those guys are future starters though. If they miss on Watson/Kizer/Trubisky/Mahomes I hope they ignore the position personally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Despite what most are saying now, if the Bears pass at #3 on any QB that becomes a star, they are going to get trashed big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:12 AM) I don't think those guys are future starters though. If they miss on Watson/Kizer/Trubisky/Mahomes I hope they ignore the position personally. Just depends on what they think of them. I've heard different reports that each of them could be NFL starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:12 AM) Despite what most are saying now, if the Bears pass at #3 on any QB that becomes a star, they are going to get trashed big time. Of course they will. That's the job of the fans. For me, it will just depend on the performance of the player they do pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Here's what I think If the CLE takes Garrett and San Fran (or whomever) takes Thomas: - Bears take a QB If Cle takes Garrett and San Fran takes Fournette or something silly: - Bears take Thomas - Bears trade into late first and get Mahomes/Kizer. But I think they'll end up with a QB at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:27 AM) Here's what I think If the CLE takes Garrett and San Fran (or whomever) takes Thomas: - Bears take a QB If Cle takes Garrett and San Fran takes Fournette or something silly: - Bears take Thomas - Bears trade into late first and get Mahomes/Kizer. But I think they'll end up with a QB at 3. This would be ideal in my world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:27 AM) Here's what I think If the CLE takes Garrett and San Fran (or whomever) takes Thomas: - Bears take a QB If Cle takes Garrett and San Fran takes Fournette or something silly: - Bears take Thomas - Bears trade into late first and get Mahomes/Kizer. But I think they'll end up with a QB at 3. I can't see the Bears taking a QB at 3. They'll trade down and get Trubisky/Mahomes/Kizer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 21, 2017 Author Share Posted April 21, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:27 AM) Here's what I think If the CLE takes Garrett and San Fran (or whomever) takes Thomas: - Bears take a QB If Cle takes Garrett and San Fran takes Fournette or something silly: - Bears take Thomas - Bears trade into late first and get Mahomes/Kizer. But I think they'll end up with a QB at 3. Kizer has a whole of oddities surrounding him. Not sure what to think of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 QUOTE (chw42 @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 10:38 AM) I can't see the Bears taking a QB at 3. They'll trade down and get Trubisky/Mahomes/Kizer. "I don't think Bears will take Bears at 3" and "Bears will trade down" are not compatible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan49 @ Apr 10, 2017 -> 02:19 PM) "We the Fans" debuts tonight on ESPN, and at 5:00 Path to the Draft on NFLN is all Bears. Anybody watch the "We the Fans" special? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Apr 21, 2017 -> 09:49 PM) "I don't think Bears will take Bears at 3" and "Bears will trade down" are not compatible. As long as they pay in honey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 I think the Bears will draft Watson #3. Greg Gabriel had a tweet the other day indicating that Trubisky was not on the Bears draft board or at least not high and had the same statement about Jonathan Allen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogua Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Apr 25, 2017 -> 11:20 AM) I think the Bears will draft Watson #3. Greg Gabriel had a tweet the other day indicating that Trubisky was not on the Bears draft board or at least not high and had the same statement about Jonathan Allen. Pace has been pretty consistent with the best player available thing. If he takes Watson at 3 it would be a pretty big stretch. Terrible pick. The Bears shouldn't take a QB at 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts