Jump to content

Opening Day 4/4/2017 - White Sox vs Tigers


flavum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the toughest thing for me will be the amount of time the Sox get runners in scoring position but dont get them in. Currently, the Sox have more hits in the game than the tigers do, yet the tigers are leading by 4 runs. Situations like that happened oh too often last year, and the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Scoots @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 03:16 PM)
I think the toughest thing for me will be the amount of time the Sox get runners in scoring position but dont get them in. Currently, the Sox have more hits in the game than the tigers do, yet the tigers are leading by 4 runs. Situations like that happened oh too often last year, and the year before.

The back end of the lineup is just horrible, but that's mostly by design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Sox-35th @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 03:18 PM)
The back end of the lineup is just horrible, but that's mostly by design.

 

Exactly. I'm rooting for these guys to be good enough to keep playing. Nobody wants to see May hitting .134 a month from now. But .234? Sure.

Edited by flavum
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Scoots @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 02:59 PM)
Benetti called that first pitch curveball nasty...it was literally a hanger and should have been hit 400 feet. Anderson just watched 2 strikes and swung at a ball...hes gotta get disciplined, especially as a number 2 hitter. Only first game though.

 

No, he looked at a first pitch curve that most wouldn't swing at first pitch then looked at a ball that was called a strike and swung at a ball on an 0-2 count. Big difference between 1-1 and 0-2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 03:27 PM)
I couldn't believe how huge Petricka is in person. I literally ran into him at Soxfest. He is gigantic.

Well the Astros drew a 0 rating one game during their rebuild. Now they're good. So there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Joshua Strong @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 02:56 PM)
Let say this ovvereaction comes true and Q has a down season compared to his usual numbers, the Sox still traded Sale and Eaton and got a lot back for both. How many rebuilding teams, especially as of late, kicked off their rebuilds with moves like that. So Q having a down year wouldn't be the end of the world.

Another year of Q means one less year on his contract, one more question mark (if he did have a down year), and honestly, it sets backs our rebuilding effort. No, it's not the end of the world (that comes under a nightmare scenario of all of our prospects busting), but I don't know how anyone couldn't be disappointed. Hahn sure as hell wouldn't be happy. The ultimate goal here is to trade everyone with high value, to maximize return, and speed up those inevitable down years of a rebuild.

 

On the brightside, we're losing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 03:28 PM)
Rebuilding is the right move. Keep saying it.

Speaking of things that got old fast: Watching Adam Dunn, Adam LaRoche, Avisail Garcia, Alexei Ramirez, Gordon Beckham, Nick Swisher, Jeff Samardjia, Jake Peavy, and countless other people I can hardly remember anymore grossly underperform for a decade.

 

This is the right thing. It sucks, but it's the right thing.

Edited by Sox-35th
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 03:32 PM)
It's going to be interesting what the consensus is on the state of the rebuild on August 1st.

It will certainly be easy to find the stupid people. We're better than this. A rebuild takes years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 4, 2017 -> 08:32 PM)
Abreu is just having an awful game in the field today. It is like no one from the Tigers or White Sox wants to be in the field today.

 

It was obvious last year he should have been made full time DH. His defense cost the Sox a few games last year. The Sox are solid defensively up the middle but absolutely terrible everywhere else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...