Jump to content

2017-2018 NFL Thread


Recommended Posts

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 31, 2017 -> 04:54 PM)
Umm,

 

Aaron Goldhammer‏Verified account @HammerNation19 49m49 minutes ago Grossi says that apparently the Browns were celebrating their trade and forgot to call in the deal before the deadline...

 

The Browns win...but it's still a photo finish

Edited by Jenksy Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Oct 31, 2017 -> 03:39 PM)
Wow. That seems interesting for a 5-3 team that already lacks in wide receiving depth.

Apparently the Panthers' logic is that both Benjamin and Devin Funchess are big, short distance receivers is making it tough for the Panthers to stretch the field when their best 2 receivers are on the field, so they're moving the more expensive one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 10:40 AM)
https://twitter.com/BradBiggs/status/925746340751204352

 

Watch this guys. This is a terrible explanation of why it was overturned. Based on that replay this dude provided, you can't see s*** and these officials and replay keeps embarrassing themselves

 

How the hell can they tell that the ball touched the ground? It's like they made up their damn minds before even reviewing the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 11:16 AM)
That seemed too ridiculous. Something that is only believable because of the Browns commitment to incompetence.

We don't know for sure it was because they were "Celebrating" but a number of places are running the "Browns deal canceled because their papers came in after the deadline" story and I think we can believe that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (chw42 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 10:52 AM)
How the hell can they tell that the ball touched the ground? It's like they made up their damn minds before even reviewing the play.

 

It has to be indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field, and that was anything but indisputable evidence. when he points to the ball being loose on the ground, YOU CANT EVEN SEE THE BALL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 11:37 AM)
It has to be indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field, and that was anything but indisputable evidence. when he points to the ball being loose on the ground, YOU CANT EVEN SEE THE BALL

 

Does the NFL have camera angles that television doesn't have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 11:52 AM)
Does the NFL have camera angles that television doesn't have?

 

If that's the case...show that angle in the official NFL review. They are pointing to something they in no way could say is showing the ball on the ground. It's a disgrace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 09:56 AM)
If that's the case...show that angle in the official NFL review. They are pointing to something they in no way could say is showing the ball on the ground. It's a disgrace.

Total disgrace. They say the ball is loose just because the defender has an arm in there but that doesn't make it loose and the other " ball is loose" the picture is blurry , can't see the ball and if you could see the ball they have the yellow arrow in the way. Just add insult to injury why don't you NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 11:37 AM)
It has to be indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field, and that was anything but indisputable evidence. when he points to the ball being loose on the ground, YOU CANT EVEN SEE THE BALL

 

Here's what I think. They called it incomplete because he dropped it well after he caught it. They realized it was unpopular so went backward trying to argue the other parts of the catch it touched the ground even though it clearly didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a fantasy owner, that was very annoying. No, I should not have believed Irsay saying he play week one, but I did think when he wasn't put on IR he would be a week 4ish type player.

 

It was clear it was way way off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...