Balta1701 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 QUOTE (credezcrew24 @ Oct 31, 2017 -> 12:06 PM) If the Sox think Dee Gordon could play well in CF he could be an interesting candidate Ugh, please no more guys who are coming off the stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 My desire for Gordon has passed. Wanted him before the Dodgers traded him but now, no thanks. His entire game is based off his speed and I question how good that speed will be by the time the Sox are a contender again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 31, 2017 -> 02:05 PM) Ugh, please no more guys who are coming off the stuff. Exactly. Once you’re in the MLBPA, and get busted, you’re dead to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 Why has no one mentioned Schwarber... If he were on any other team but the Cubs everyone would want him as our buy low guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (cjgalloway @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 09:22 AM) Why has no one mentioned Schwarber... If he were on any other team but the Cubs everyone would want him as our buy low guy. I don't think it's very likely the Cubs trade him and we've got enough guys in our lineup who will need at bats that we really don't have a DH or corner OF spot for him. I'm not giving up anything of value for him with where we're at - talk to me in a year or two if they're closer to letting him go. Even guys like Fulmer have more value to me based on what our organization has. IF we're talking buy-low guys, I would be circling names of pitchers, starters and relievers. We have enough AAAA level guys to fight it out for lineup positions before the thing in RF arrives to take its rightful spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (cjgalloway @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 09:22 AM) Why has no one mentioned Schwarber... If he were on any other team but the Cubs everyone would want him as our buy low guy. Because he isn't going to be a buy low guy. He will still cost a significant amount of prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 10:01 AM) Because he isn't going to be a buy low guy. He will still cost a significant amount of prospects. Absolutely. He still hit 30 homers, had a .782 OPS, has many years of cheap control, and by all accounts Theo LOVES him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 09:25 AM) I don't think it's very likely the Cubs trade him and we've got enough guys in our lineup who will need at bats that we really don't have a DH or corner OF spot for him. I'm not giving up anything of value for him with where we're at - talk to me in a year or two if they're closer to letting him go. Even guys like Fulmer have more value to me based on what our organization has. IF we're talking buy-low guys, I would be circling names of pitchers, starters and relievers. We have enough AAAA level guys to fight it out for lineup positions before the thing in RF arrives to take its rightful spot. The White Sox already turned down Kyle Schwarber. Doesn't really fit the the timeline. And they don't really have anything to acquire him that the Cubs would want anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 11:15 AM) The White Sox already turned down Kyle Schwarber. Doesn't really fit the the timeline. And they don't really have anything to acquire him that the Cubs would want anymore. The White Sox have plenty of guys the Cubs would want. The problem is the guys the Cubs would want aren't the guys the Sox would trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 On June 2nd, Kyle Schwarber hit his season low OPS of .621. After that date, in 278 PAs, he put up a .246/.338/.561/.900 line. The dude isn't going anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 01:21 PM) On June 2nd, Kyle Schwarber hit his season low OPS of .621. After that date, in 278 PAs, he put up a .246/.338/.561/.900 line. The dude isn't going anywhere. He may well go somewhere. With the needs in the rotation the Cubs have, someone is probably getting traded. Two things I do know is that it won't be the White Sox trading for him, and if a team does trade for him, it will be at a significant price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 1, 2017 -> 01:23 PM) He may well go somewhere. With the needs in the rotation the Cubs have, someone is probably getting traded. Two things I do know is that it won't be the White Sox trading for him, and if a team does trade for him, it will be at a significant price. Epstein is obsessed with the guy. I could certainly see Ian Happ get flipped for a #3 starter and a reliever. Maybe something like Ian Happ for SP Dylan Bundy and RP Brad Brach. Maybe throw in Caratini if they had to. Edited November 2, 2017 by ChiliIrishHammock24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Just my opinion but if I were the cubs I'd used Schwarber to try a nab a younger pitcher with team control and keep Happ. Then do the Heyward for Samardzija swap if SF is truly interested in Heyward. That said, I hope the cubs do neither of those. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananarchy Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 02:47 AM) Just my opinion but if I were the cubs I'd used Schwarber to try a nab a younger pitcher with team control and keep Happ. Then do the Heyward for Samardzija swap if SF is truly interested in Heyward. That said, I hope the cubs do neither of those. Me, too. Schwarber is a liability in the National League. That being said, I don't really want to trade prospects for him and fill the DH spot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerksticks Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Plus Schwarber was pretty much platooned the second half and sat against some tough righties. The resurgence numbers are very very misleading. I don't think he fetches much, especially from NL teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (Sox-35th @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 07:27 AM) Me, too. Schwarber is a liability in the National League. That being said, I don't really want to trade prospects for him and fill the DH spot. Well yeah, I think any team taking him would know he's a platoon player. But the left-handed part is going to be playing majority of the time since there are more righties than lefties. Just gotta have a Ryan Raburn type on your bench to split time with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 02:47 AM) Just my opinion but if I were the cubs I'd used Schwarber to try a nab a younger pitcher with team control and keep Happ. Well obviously, that's what an rational person who didn't have emotional attachments to him would do. But Theo is obsessed with Schwarber. He's his "told you so!" guy. He refuses to believe everyone who says he's just a DH. He is on record calling him "Babe f***ing Ruth". Theo is more likely to trade Rizzo or Bryant than he is Schwarber. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 01:28 PM) Well obviously, that's what an rational person who didn't have emotional attachments to him would do. But Theo is obsessed with Schwarber. He's his "told you so!" guy. He refuses to believe everyone who says he's just a DH. He is on record calling him "Babe f***ing Ruth". Theo is more likely to trade Rizzo or Bryant than he is Schwarber. I don't deny Theo's love for The Schwab but come on now. But hey, if Theo loves him that much then by all means they can have him and go ahead and trade Happ, which I doubt they do if they are able to move Heyward somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
credezcrew24 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 11:28 AM) Well obviously, that's what an rational person who didn't have emotional attachments to him would do. But Theo is obsessed with Schwarber. He's his "told you so!" guy. He refuses to believe everyone who says he's just a DH. He is on record calling him "Babe f***ing Ruth". Theo is more likely to trade Rizzo or Bryant than he is Schwarber. You can make fun of Theo all you want, but Schwarber's 0.0 bWAR in 2017 is mighty sexy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 02:20 PM) I don't deny Theo's love for The Schwab but come on now. But hey, if Theo loves him that much then by all means they can have him and go ahead and trade Happ, which I doubt they do if they are able to move Heyward somehow. Oh yeah, if they are able to come out from under Heyward, might as well go for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (credezcrew24 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 04:09 PM) You can make fun of Theo all you want, but Schwarber's 0.0 bWAR in 2017 is mighty sexy My girlfriend has Schwarber's number. I constantly pressure her to ridicule him via text. But instead, she is in love with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 04:54 PM) My girlfriend has Schwarber's number. I constantly pressure her to ridicule him via text. But instead, she is in love with him. Time for a new GF dude. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 05:05 PM) Time for a new GF dude. QFT & FIFY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackSox13 Posted November 3, 2017 Share Posted November 3, 2017 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Nov 2, 2017 -> 06:01 PM) QFT & FIFY Lol, I was trying to be nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 The question is, how does she have his number? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.