steveno89 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 09:57 AM) Where did the idea of JBJ or Abreu even come from? I haven't seen that suggested anywhere other than this site. Right before I mentioned that I would not want to deal any significant prospects for JBJ, and I don't like the fit of an Avi or Abreu to Boston deal if JBJ is the main piece coming back is what I meant. Basically I don't see a JBJ deal happening. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 09:01 AM) Right before I mentioned that I would not want to deal any significant prospects for JBJ, and I don't like the fit of an Avi or Abreu to Boston deal if JBJ is the main piece coming back is what I meant. Basically I don't see a JBJ deal happening. Wasn't fully directed at you but I've just seen it in this thread and possibly others. My bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 Here's another fun one... Rodon for Bradley Jr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (cjgalloway @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 10:44 AM) Here's another fun one... Rodon for Bradley Jr. I'm in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveno89 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 11:09 AM) I'm in. I'd do it too. I don't think Rodon has much trade value with all the injury issues. Our best bet is to let him rehab and come back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 QUOTE (steveno89 @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 06:37 PM) I'd do it too. I don't think Rodon has much trade value with all the injury issues. Our best bet is to let him rehab and come back. He also hasn't nearly "Broken Out" yet. He's the kind of guy I'd be ok with us acquiring if he wasn't on our roster to give a shot to - big time talent, hasn't put things together yet. No one would be surprised if he came out and dropped a 2.50 ERA some year, but he's not that pitcher yet. I've just got a bad feeling about him not breaking out with us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Quite strange Cafardo changed article to remove WSox as being interested Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 06:33 PM) Quite strange Cafardo changed article to remove WSox as being interested Good catch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 QUOTE (raBBit @ Nov 30, 2017 -> 12:55 AM) I'll take your word for it but is there some sort of support for this? Did he acknowledge an edit? It was on the Garfien podcast yesterday where they said the WSox weren't in the article now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 06:57 PM) It was on the Garfien podcast yesterday where they said the WSox weren't in the article now Yeah you can get the article from Carfados twitter and they definitely were removed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 From current article: Dave Dombrowski has said he’s not interested in moving Jackie Bradley Jr., but the Giants and Royals will likely keep inquiring. Should the Red Sox acquire a power-hitting outfielder, they could deal Bradley and move Andrew Benintendi to center. Originally: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 Maybe I’m slow, but why would he remove the Sox? I no doubt believe it was intentional, just trying to understand the likely reasoning for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Nov 29, 2017 -> 07:15 PM) Maybe I'm slow, but why would he remove the Sox? I no doubt believe it was intentional, just trying to understand the likely reasoning for it. Most likely... It was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted November 30, 2017 Share Posted November 30, 2017 guessing he just left sox in there because they had previously been interested. Even the way it was initially written was "surely the white sox would be interested" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.