southsider2k5 Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking That playoff prediction for the Bulls doesn't seem so far fetched now... Could .500 be a more realistic goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/powerranking That playoff prediction for the Bulls doesn't seem so far fetched now... Could .500 be a more realistic goal. 38-42 wins seems very likely, at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gene Honda Civic Posted October 1, 2003 Share Posted October 1, 2003 .500 is a distict possibility. And in the weak ass Eastern Conference one team who's under .500 WILL bein the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 How they had New Orleans up so high and above Orlando with Tim Floyd as coach, I've got no idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Be Good Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 KNICKS 24 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 2, 2003 Author Share Posted October 2, 2003 KNICKS 24 Don't look surprised. The Knicks suck. Heck they are an injury away from a 20 win season, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted October 2, 2003 Share Posted October 2, 2003 Don't look surprised. The Knicks suck. Heck they are an injury away from a 20 win season, IMO. Well what'd they do, trade Latrell Spreewell for Keith Van Horn(essentially). You're going to be mired in mediocrity if that s*** happens. Van Horn's a decent player, but he can't hold Spreewell's jock, I don't care how many coaches Spreewell chokes. I'd much rather have the mean son of a b**** with anger problems on my team who is a damn good player rather then the decent, quiet, no problem type player. Who would you rather have, Randy Moss or Rod Smith? Terrell Owens or Peerless Price? Ray Lewis or London Fletcher? I think you get the picture. 24th doesn't surprise me....in fact, they should probably be lower then that. They are so close to being terrible that it ain't funny. And they drafted Sweetney for PF right? Isn't 6'8'' a tad short for a PF? I think Dennis Rodman is the only exception to that rule. The Knicks are headed in the wrong direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.