Dam8610 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:43 PM) Because they play them 18 or 19 times. It is very understandable. If the White Sox word isn't good enough, then it won't happen. Probably won't happen anyway. There has to be at least one top guy in the package or it makes no sense for Baltimore. Why? If the Orioles are going to be bad either way, it stands to reason that trading him for something now is better than letting him walk and getting only a 2nd round comp pick. If the Orioles are looking at it that way, getting something of more value than that would be their floor for dealing him. The White Sox have many ways they could exceed that floor without giving up any core rebuild pieces. Avi, Fulmer, Cease is a package that I'd be okay with parting with that doesn't really tough the rebuild assets all that much, but may look better to the O's than anything else they're getting offered. Of course, that would all be with the caveat that the White Sox are committed to extending him and get the job done. Otherwise even that becomes an overpay. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:50 PM) FWIW, he had a slow start last year and at the deadline his OPS was only .751. It was .829 over the final 2 months. I bet they could trade Manny Machado for more than a Yolmer Sanchez even if he’s hitting a .700 OPs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 15, 2017 -> 12:52 AM) Anyone think the Yankees offer could be better but they just don't want to trade him to the Yankees? Pretty much guarantee that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt574 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:41 PM) Why do the O's care if he ends up there for one season, a season in which O's will be bad if they trade him? He could easily end up in NY for the next decade. That might happen anyway once he's a free agent, but I'm sure they don't want it to look like they facilitated it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose Abreu Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:51 PM) The thing is there isn't going to be an extension. I am pretty sure Baltimore knows that or they would be negotiating with him. Probably one reason they won't grant a 72 hour window, even though that would virtually guarantee he wouldn't be traded to the Yankees, is because they know it is pointless. If it would be pointless, then why not grant the window to increase their return? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsoxhurt35 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 I leave for an hour and now it’s a cluster. Lol I don’t care this is at the very least entertaining Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:31 PM) Because as the post right before yours explained: try and buy him for a dollar and sell him for two. Hahn is simply kicking the tires here. He'd be stupid/lazy and bad at his job if he didn't at least look into it. As for the TV analogy: I'd flip the TV for $600 tmr and double my money. That's what Hahn is trying to see if he can accomplish. I think poker is a better analogy. We’re the big stack at the table and the blinds are still low. We can play some hands we have no business playing and maybe get lucky and win a big pot. The fact we are deep in prospect currency allows us to throw a moderate offer the Orioles’ way and keep ourselves in the conversation. The odds may be low, but if no one comes in with a big offer then maybe our token package wins it. There’s most definitely a price that makes sense for us to acquire him now as long as the Sox are willing to commit $300M+ towards next offseason. If they aren’t willing to commit that much money then I’d say this is one of the dumbest ideas I have ever seen. I don’t really buy that part of Nightengale’s article though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxforlife05 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:47 PM) Screw the promise, no reason to lose a possible mid season trade partner Agreed. If they don't want the chance the sox or another team could flip him at the deadline they should hold on to him until he becomes a FA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:53 PM) If it would be pointless, then why not grant the window to increase their return? Because it's Baltimore, a team that just said they don't believe in international spending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt574 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Dam8610 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:52 PM) Why? If the Orioles are going to be bad either way, it stands to reason that trading him for something now is better than letting him walk and getting only a 2nd round comp pick. If the Orioles are looking at it that way, getting something of more value than that would be their floor for dealing him. The White Sox have many ways they could exceed that floor without giving up any core rebuild pieces. Avi, Fulmer, Cease is a package that I'd be okay with parting with that doesn't really tough the rebuild assets all that much, but may look better to the O's than anything else they're getting offered. Of course, that would all be with the caveat that the White Sox are committed to extending him and get the job done. Otherwise even that becomes an overpay. Not that I'm all that attached to any of them, but Avi, Cease, and Fulmer seems like a steep price for one year of Machado at around $17M (projected arbitration salary). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Sockin @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:51 PM) I think what Nightengale is saying now is probably truth as he mentioned earlier the Sox officials were surprised they had the best offer. My joke about being the guys in a fantasy auction who bid on a player and then panic when nobody else bids turned out to be eerily accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:53 PM) If it would be pointless, then why not grant the window to increase their return? Why agree to a trade you know is never going to happen when MM and proposed trade partner don’t come to a deal after 72 hours. What does that accomplish? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (Dam8610 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:52 PM) Why? If the Orioles are going to be bad either way, it stands to reason that trading him for something now is better than letting him walk and getting only a 2nd round comp pick. If the Orioles are looking at it that way, getting something of more value than that would be their floor for dealing him. The White Sox have many ways they could exceed that floor without giving up any core rebuild pieces. Avi, Fulmer, Cease is a package that I'd be okay with parting with that doesn't really tough the rebuild assets all that much, but may look better to the O's than anything else they're getting offered. Of course, that would all be with the caveat that the White Sox are committed to extending him and get the job done. Otherwise even that becomes an overpay. They have some decent players. How does Avi, Fulmer, Cease make them playoff contenders in a couple of years? They are pretty much screwed right now. Their best chance at actually winning the next 5 years is keeping Machado this year, and hoping everything goes right. Once he is gone, so is all hope in Baltimore for a long while. Edited December 14, 2017 by Dick Allen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 The O's are fairly pathetic. Why worry about what the Yankees will do? Maybe we trade him at the deadline. So beat them. Isnt that what this sport is about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxforlife05 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (bighurt574 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:56 PM) Not that I'm all that attached to any of them, but Avi, Cease, and Fulmer seems like a steep price for one year of Machado at around $17M (projected arbitration salary). I wouldn't include Avi if we don't get a window that allows the completion of the deal to be contingent on extending Machado. I think we could recoup at least half of the value of Fulmer and Cease/Dunning at the deadline if we can't sign him before then. Worth the risk? Maybe. Still don't think we'd be able to sign him before then. Edited December 15, 2017 by soxforlife05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dam8610 Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (bighurt574 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:56 PM) Not that I'm all that attached to any of them, but Avi, Cease, and Fulmer seems like a steep price for one year of Machado at around $17M (projected arbitration salary). I said it was an overpay if you don't get the extension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldsox Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:09 PM) What are the other five? James Shields is obviously one of them. What else are you including? The Shields trade counts twice, it was soooo stupid. Getting only two prospects (and I love both Kopech and Moncada) for Sale is another. The Yankee swindle is a third or fourth. One to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 They must really like the Yankees package if they're that afraid to trade him to a rebulding tean lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Latilleon Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 (edited) QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:40 PM) Many seem to have not read the article as Nightengale said there's no chance the Sox would actually give Manny a huge contract This makes no sense to trade him thinking the Sox will flip him versus thinking he would be in long term plans and they don’t want him going to a team they sign him to a long term extension. No one expects the Sox to make any noise this year, franchise 3rd baseman or not. And if the Orioles are so worried about him going to the Yankees, why don’t they hold onto him until the trade deadline? Edited December 15, 2017 by Latilleon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Baron @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:56 PM) The O's are fairly pathetic. Why worry about what the Yankees will do? Maybe we trade him at the deadline. So beat them. Isnt that what this sport is about? Hard when you have an owner like that. I like Dan Duquette and he’s done a great job, but man they are an obnoxious franchise. I’m probably missing some team, but he’s the worst owner now right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (oldsox @ Dec 15, 2017 -> 12:58 AM) The Shields trade counts twice, it was soooo stupid. Getting only two prospects (and I love both Kopech and Moncada) for Sale is another. The Yankee swindle is a third or fourth. One to go. Sale trade was fair, no complains there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 (edited) Watch this end up being a situation like the Samardzija deal where people were freaking out we dealt Anderson and it turned out to be more about quantity than quality. Watch a deal somehow center around Stephens and Adams while everyone else is intact. Edited December 15, 2017 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 14, 2017 Share Posted December 14, 2017 QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 05:53 PM) If it would be pointless, then why not grant the window to increase their return? Because they know it's a waste of time and if one team fails, all the others will finally be convinced that perhaps they aren't so special to Machado, and if they acquire him, they will be bidding against a few other teams for his services after the 2018 WS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 QUOTE (bmags @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 07:59 PM) Hard when you have an owner like that. I like Dan Duquette and he’s done a great job, but man they are an obnoxious franchise. I’m probably missing some team, but he’s the worst owner now right? Marlins? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrathofhahn Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 14, 2017 -> 06:40 PM) Why? Because you are locked in with one year of Machado. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.