hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (Jenksy Cat @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 11:05 AM) No thanks. Now is not the time to be paying kings ransom prices for anyone not named Mike Trout. Give these guys 2018 to develop and hopefully in 12/2018 we're in a spot to spend a bunch of money and pull off a trade or 2 that puts us in contention for 2019. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (HeGone7 @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 10:52 AM) Depth will win out. Stay the course. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 As I said in another thread - this dude will demand too much... way too much. 28 other teams will be bidding. No thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Push for Yelich next year once we know what we've got. Maybe Rutherford has a huge rebound, Dunning and Burger enter the Top 100, etc. And I wouldn't make the trade without signing someone like Machado. But man, think of that lineup. CF - Yelich 2B - Moncada 3B - Machado 1B - Abreu LF - Garcia RF - Jimenez C - Castillo DH - Delmonico? SS - Anderson OK, pipe dream over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (Quin @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 11:44 AM) Push for Yelich next year once we know what we've got. Maybe Rutherford has a huge rebound, Dunning and Burger enter the Top 100, etc. And I wouldn't make the trade without signing someone like Machado. But man, think of that lineup. CF - Yelich 2B - Moncada 3B - Machado 1B - Abreu LF - Garcia RF - Jimenez C - Castillo DH - Delmonico? SS - Anderson OK, pipe dream over. My bed sheets are wet upon waking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (GenericUserName @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 10:02 AM) I would say we might be able to decrease the price if we take on a bad contract. Maybe the reason we haven't done that with Kemp or Ellsbury yet is because that is our plan with the Marlins. That's a terrible baseball move but it's the Marlins so who knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrathofhahn Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Normally I'd say no. He doesn't fit with the timeline but with the Marlins low, low prices everything must go sale it would be a shame to not get in on it. So yeah if the trend continues and they are willing to deal him for non top prospects why the heck not. He could always be flipped later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (wrathofhahn @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 02:21 PM) Normally I'd say no. He doesn't fit with the timeline but with the Marlins low, low prices everything must go sale it would be a shame to not get in on it. So yeah if the trend continues and they are willing to deal him for non top prospects why the heck not. He could always be flipped later. What would their motivation be to trade him for little return? He isn't making a lot of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Marlins trying to dump Castro. Bring home with Yelich if it lowers the package required. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Play Castro at third? Do we really want him around Anderson and Moncada? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 12:31 PM) Marlins trying to dump Castro. Really? I've read the opposite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coco1997 Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (Quin @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 01:44 PM) Push for Yelich next year once we know what we've got. Maybe Rutherford has a huge rebound, Dunning and Burger enter the Top 100, etc. And I wouldn't make the trade without signing someone like Machado. But man, think of that lineup. CF - Yelich 2B - Moncada 3B - Machado 1B - Abreu LF - Garcia RF - Jimenez C - Castillo DH - Delmonico? SS - Anderson OK, pipe dream over. Where's Robert? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yesterday333 Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (coco1997 @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 01:41 PM) Where's Robert? Put Yelich in LF and Robert in CF... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (coco1997 @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 12:41 PM) Where's Robert? Even better. Put Avi at DH and Robert in left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 Can't see why the Marlins would let go of Yelich...nor the Sox depleting the assets they've acquired to get him. Stay the course. Don't mind the dialogue at all...and like a few said....it's the Marlins so who knows what it would take. The highest guy on the totem pole I'd trade would be Lopez. I'd consider Rutherford too. Adolfo...maybe Sheets. But they're not getting Giolito. And like others have said....guys like Moncada, Kopech and Jimenez are untouchable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 There's a price where this makes sense for us, even though it would be significant prospects. However, I think if that point is reached, someone else will be able and motivated to outbid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxforlife05 Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 No reason to make a trade like this until we see where the holes will be on our roster. I highly doubt we will need an outfielder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (hi8is @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 01:36 PM) Really? I've read the opposite. I recall reading the day they got him the Mets immediately placed a call asking about Castro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 22, 2017 Share Posted December 22, 2017 QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 04:46 PM) I recall reading the day they got him the Mets immediately placed a call asking about Castro. That doesn't mean they're trying to trade him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrathofhahn Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 QUOTE (hi8is @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 03:36 PM) Really? I've read the opposite. They want to dump salary. Why would they hold onto to Castro? Yelich gets expensive (relatively) quickly after this year. If they combine Castro with Yelich they can dump 18 million this year. Castro has 24 million left. He was actually useful last year I have no idea what his actual value is he may have moderate not negative value in a trade. I dunno. People are just assuming adding him to the trade makes him worth less he was a 2 WAR player last year and played well offensively. He maybe a couple million over paid but it's not hard to see him getting something similar in FA Yelich is also unhappy and wants to be traded. It's going to all come ahead quickly thats not to say the Sox makes a ton of sense I really don't think it does and I would rather they continue to rebuild then go for it but sometimes when the opportunity presents itself you jump on it. Marlins are having a firesale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 QUOTE (soxforlife05 @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 03:34 PM) No reason to make a trade like this until we see where the holes will be on our roster. I highly doubt we will need an outfielder. Until the guys are producing in the major leagues, you can never say that. Right now they have 0.5 outfielders depending on Avi. If you have a surplus, you can always make a trade. I joked when the Cubs traded for Russell, yet another middle.infielder, but it was a great move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fredmanrique Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 What if there is an elaborate 3 way on hahn's mind? Abreu and Avi to the same team, maybe Rockies or blue jays. Prospects from that deal plus maybe one guy like Rutherford to Marlins. Take money back too like prado. Pull every lever you can that doesn't involve our top prospects. That's be cool. My hypothesis is that 4 years of abreu, avi is worth about 60% of 5 years of yelich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 Let's revisit this trade in a year, when his trade value is lower, and the Sox might actually be ready to compete, and we also have a new batch of 2018 draftees to better supplement our system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 QUOTE (wrathofhahn @ Dec 22, 2017 -> 02:21 PM) Normally I'd say no. He doesn't fit with the timeline but with the Marlins low, low prices everything must go sale it would be a shame to not get in on it. So yeah if the trend continues and they are willing to deal him for non top prospects why the heck not. He could always be flipped later. He's under control for 5 years. If he doesn't fit the timeline, the Sox are f***ed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted December 23, 2017 Share Posted December 23, 2017 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 23, 2017 -> 01:28 AM) He's under control for 5 years. If he doesn't fit the timeline, the Sox are f***ed. Absolutely. The sox should look but the price will probably be too high right now. A team closer to winning will outbid them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.