Jump to content

Sox have team meeting after game


Kyyle23

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, greg775 said:

Not to remain Negative Nancy but I actually only liked the Robertson signing and I stood up for him throughout his tenure with the Sox. He blew a few saves but I thought he was a good closer. Our front office is in a long stretch of angering Greg. They've done a good job of acquiring guys I don't approve of. A couple times I stifled just cause the board was so happy to get some of those guys, but our front office has a horrid record since 05 of doing anything right. The rebuild? We'll see.

Who did you want this offseason then? Enlighten us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony said:

And you can’t name any former White Sox players, Royals, or Cubs. 

Go. 

Give him the Cubs. He claims he doesn’t follow them at all, and he could be telling the truth seeing as if how he thought the Cubs need a first baseman. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soxfan49 said:

Who did you want this offseason then? Enlighten us

I still think Moose would have been a good 3Bman for us for 5-6 years. Could you give me the list of last year's FAs. My preference was 2 good relievers, one GOOD starter and a third baseman, Moose, as well as one outfielder. None of those guys would have been blocking anybody and coulda helped us creep to .500. You guys with the list and pick for me. Give me a good starter, Moustakas, a good outfielder and two good relievers. That's not cheating. It's Hahn's job. I was not a big castillo fan at catcher (again Sox have made very few moves that have met my approval since 05) but at least they tried there. You'll get mad at me for Royals talk, but Cain is a winner as well.

Edited by greg775
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, soxfan49 said:

Give him the Cubs. He claims he doesn’t follow them at all, and he could be telling the truth seeing as if how he thought the Cubs need a first baseman. ?

I don't follow the Cubs. Frankly I wish I could stomach them cause I'm dying to care about a team that wins. But I hate the Cubs and know very little about them. No time to follow teams besides the Sox. I enjoy listening to Denny Matthews get crabby (less this year for some reason) and bark at his co announcers so sometimes in the car I listen to royals when driving. No Cubs though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, greg775 said:

I still think Moose would have been a good 3Bman for us for 5-6 years. Could you give me the list of last year's FAs. My preference was 2 good relievers, one GOOD starter and a third baseman, Moose, as well as one outfielder. None of those guys would have been blocking anybody and coulda helped us creep to .500. You guys with the list and pick for me. Give me a good starter, Moustakas, a good outfielder and two good relievers. That's not cheating. It's Hahn's job. I was not a big castillo fan at catcher (again Sox have made very few moves that have met my approval since 05) but at least they tried there. You'll get mad at me for Royals talk, but Cain is a winner as well.

So you don't like the job Yolmer has done? And signing one starter would have saved this team. Got it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, greg775 said:

I still think Moose would have been a good 3Bman for us for 5-6 years. Could you give me the list of last year's FAs. My preference was 2 good relievers, one GOOD starter and a third baseman, Moose, as well as one outfielder. None of those guys would have been blocking anybody and coulda helped us creep to .500. You guys with the list and pick for me. Give me a good starter, Moustakas, a good outfielder and two good relievers. That's not cheating. It's Hahn's job. I was not a big castillo fan at catcher (again Sox have made very few moves that have met my approval since 05) but at least they tried there. You'll get mad at me for Royals talk, but Cain is a winner as well.

So aside from one, you’ve hated every signing/trade since 2005. Conveniently, I bet prior to 2005, you loved the Podsednik trade, Dye signing, Contreras trade, and Iguchi signing, right?

Also, stop with the Moustakas stuff. Like another poster said, Sanchez has been good at 3B. Furthermore, IIRC he would have costed the Sox a draft pick, and if Moustakas was such a no-brainer, why did no one else sign him?

Lastly, why should I give you the list of free agents? It’s an easy google search, and YOU are the one who keeps pushing the “sign veterans” stuff, so again I ask, which veterans did you want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, soxfan49 said:

So aside from one, you’ve hated every signing/trade since 2005. Conveniently, I bet prior to 2005, you loved the Podsednik trade, Dye signing, Contreras trade, and Iguchi signing, right?

Also, stop with the Moustakas stuff. Like another poster said, Sanchez has been good at 3B. Furthermore, IIRC he would have costed the Sox a draft pick, and if Moustakas was such a no-brainer, why did no one else sign him?

Lastly, why should I give you the list of free agents? It’s an easy google search, and YOU are the one who keeps pushing the “sign veterans” stuff, so again I ask, which veterans did you want?

I've hated almost all our moves, yes. I was very happy about Pods. I worshiped Dye. Loved Contreras and loved Iguchi acquisition. Of the four I probably loved Contreras the least. Why can't you guys help me out. You tell me two relievers we could have signed who are very good; one starter very good; one third baseman and one outfielder and maybe a catcher besides Beef. All it woulda cost is a few bucks. It wouldn't have prevented anybody from advancement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, soxfan2014 said:

So you don't like the job Yolmer has done? And signing one starter would have saved this team. Got it.

I wanted .500 then we bring up Eloy and Kopech and maybe we win a lousy division while rebuilding. I wanted two relievers of note, one starter, one third baseman and one outfielder baby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, greg775 said:

I wanted .500 then we bring up Eloy and Kopech and maybe we win a lousy division while rebuilding. I wanted two relievers of note, one starter, one third baseman and one outfielder baby.

Cleveland won 102 games last year. There was no indication that this division would be lousy.

 

20 minutes ago, greg775 said:

I've hated almost all our moves, yes. I was very happy about Pods. I worshiped Dye. Loved Contreras and loved Iguchi acquisition. Of the four I probably loved Contreras the least. Why can't you guys help me out. You tell me two relievers we could have signed who are very good; one starter very good; one third baseman and one outfielder and maybe a catcher besides Beef. All it woulda cost is a few bucks. It wouldn't have prevented anybody from advancement.

Sox do well- you love all acquisitions. Sox stink- you hate all acquisitions. Convenient and fitting. Hats off to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, greg775 said:

The Sox inability to remain atop that weak division after winning it all in 05 is one of the great tragedies in Chicago sports history. 

9 of the 12.AL Central winners since 2005 won at least 93 games, but Im.just a statnik 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...