ptatc Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 On 8/15/2018 at 10:39 PM, elrockinMT said: No doubt about it.... we have to work on the bullpen for 2019 Expand They aren't trying to be competitive in 2019. Next year is to let the young players get experience to see if they can compete in 2020 or 2021. If they were serious about competing in 2019 they would have the young players in the MLB learning now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananarchy Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 (edited) Yeah, if the goal is to be better in 2019, bullpen is so irrelevant. It's one of the easiest things to buy/replace. Plus, not all of our young arms are going to be starters. A team that builds a good bullpen expects to compete now Edited August 15, 2018 by AustinIllini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 Bullpen tried to give it away at the end (nothing new about that) but did just enough to hang on. Nice job by Rodon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/15/2018 at 6:04 PM, ChiSox59 said: Rodon just threw a ball right down broadway for stike 3 against Candelario. Except Narvaez has no idea how to catch, so it was called a ball. HPB next pitch. Expand I hope you were actually watching the game and not just watching game day. Any nitwit could just blame the catcher for that without actually using his eyes to see what happened. As i have said many times when talking about pitch framing you cannot frame a pitch that you are lunging for and many strike calls are missed when a catcher has to move from where he set up to where the pitch actually ends up. In this case Narvaez was set up inside and the pitch ended up on the outer half and a bit above the belt. ( not right down the middle but also not on the outer edge . The ball was all clearly in the zone. Narvaez had to do a quick lunge across the plate caught it of course in the zone but lunging causes momentum and his glove after he caught it continued out of the zone. It is nuts to blame the catcher on that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnin' two Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 12:36 AM, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said: I hope you were actually watching the game and not just watching game day. Any nitwit could just blame the catcher for that without actually using his eyes to see what happened. As i have said many times when talking about pitch framing you cannot frame a pitch that you are lunging for and many strike calls are missed when a catcher has to move from where he set up to where the pitch actually ends up. In this case Narvaez was set up inside and the pitch ended up on the outer half and a bit above the belt. ( not right down the middle but also not on the outer edge . The ball was all clearly in the zone. Narvaez had to do a quick lunge across the plate caught it of course in the zone but lunging causes momentum and his glove after he caught it continued out of the zone. It is nuts to blame the catcher on that. Expand Framing shouldn't even be part of the conversation unless the pitch is around the margins of the strike zone. If an ump misses a blatant call like that there is no way it should be a mark against the catcher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 12:54 AM, turnin' two said: Framing shouldn't even be part of the conversation unless the pitch is around the margins of the strike zone. If an ump misses a blatant call like that there is no way it should be a mark against the catcher. Expand Exactly. Some posters just jump on the Narvaez can't frame bandwagon and blame him for every non strike call on a strike. I've seen umps miss calls like that many many times when a pitcher misses his spot and the catcher has to lunge to catch it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 12:54 AM, turnin' two said: Framing shouldn't even be part of the conversation unless the pitch is around the margins of the strike zone. If an ump misses a blatant call like that there is no way it should be a mark against the catcher. Expand On 8/16/2018 at 1:00 AM, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said: Exactly. Some posters just jump on the Narvaez can't frame bandwagon and blame him for every non strike call on a strike. I've seen umps miss calls like that many many times when a pitcher misses his spot and the catcher has to lunge to catch it. Expand Thank you times a million. You can't possibly frame a pitch that is on the other side of the plate from where you are set up on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoosierSox Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Time for robot umps. Then we wouldn't have to worry about framing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnin' two Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 1:13 AM, HoosierSox said: Time for robot umps. Then we wouldn't have to worry about framing. Expand My top reason for wanting robot umps. To kill the framing conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 1:13 AM, HoosierSox said: Time for robot umps. Then we wouldn't have to worry about framing. Expand I really hope not. I’d rather see a batter swing with two strikes that might be just off the plate than a bunch of hitters guessing all game, and pitchers trying to nip the front corner of the zone with breaking pitches. The first step for improved ball/strike calling is accountability of the umpires. They’re graded. Get the best umps and let them be home plate umpires more often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/15/2018 at 10:58 PM, ptatc said: They aren't trying to be competitive in 2019. Next year is to let the young players get experience to see if they can compete in 2020 or 2021. If they were serious about competing in 2019 they would have the young players in the MLB learning now. Expand They want to be competitive and I believe Hahn said that. I understand your point but at the very least we need to be working on it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turnin' two Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 1:21 AM, flavum said: I really hope not. I’d rather see a batter swing with two strikes that might be just off the plate than a bunch of hitters guessing all game, and pitchers trying to nip the front corner of the zone with breaking pitches. The first step for improved ball/strike calling is accountability of the umpires. They’re graded. Get the best umps and let them be home plate umpires more often. Expand Isn't that what they have to do now? Except they even have to guess what the umpire will call a strike and what he won't. At least with a roboump there would be a consistent strike zone, and strikes would be strikes and balls would be balls. Quite the novel concept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 3:13 AM, turnin' two said: Isn't that what they have to do now? Except they even have to guess what the umpire will call a strike and what he won't. At least with a roboump there would be a consistent strike zone, and strikes would be strikes and balls would be balls. Quite the novel concept. Expand I just think the game is better when hitters have to be in hit mode. If they went Robo-ump, the mindset is to prove what a great eye you have- longer games, more walks...worse game. And then what I said about pitchers...they can try to hit the zone with a curve that will end up way out, but they don’t have to worry about framing. I just think they need better umps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 2:02 AM, elrockinMT said: They want to be competitive and I believe Hahn said that. I understand your point but at the very least we need to be working on it Expand We'll know by who they bring up in September. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 12:36 AM, CaliSoxFanViaSWside said: I hope you were actually watching the game and not just watching game day. Any nitwit could just blame the catcher for that without actually using his eyes to see what happened. As i have said many times when talking about pitch framing you cannot frame a pitch that you are lunging for and many strike calls are missed when a catcher has to move from where he set up to where the pitch actually ends up. In this case Narvaez was set up inside and the pitch ended up on the outer half and a bit above the belt. ( not right down the middle but also not on the outer edge . The ball was all clearly in the zone. Narvaez had to do a quick lunge across the plate caught it of course in the zone but lunging causes momentum and his glove after he caught it continued out of the zone. It is nuts to blame the catcher on that. Expand Yes I was watching the game. It was an awful display of catching. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 On 8/16/2018 at 11:54 AM, ChiSox59 said: Yes I was watching the game. It was an awful display of catching. Expand Where was the catcher set up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts