Jump to content

Rosenthal: Could Harper be headed to the southside


Sleepy Harold

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cubs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cubs</a> seem finically tied up, but I would never count them out in a race of a hot top target free agent like <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Machado?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Machado</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Harper?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Harper</a>. Nothings of the table</p>&mdash; Sports Daily (@Sportsdaily079) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sportsdaily079/status/1072783141042040833?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Soxbadger said:

 

I could see Harper taking a short offer if its something like 4 years 160 mil+. That way he would only need to get 6 years 200 to hit 10 years 360. 

It seems completely unlikely for a Boras client though as this really is Harpers best time to get a record breaking deal. 

In 4 years Trout will have signed his new deal and it will probably reset the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fathom said:

You'll be shocked to know I'm having problems with a tweet, but Craig Mish (great Marlins insider) said on the radio that everything he's hearing is Harper to the Dodgers.

Dodgers surely remain a considerable threat to sign Harper, as do the Phillies, and Nationals. 

 

4 minutes ago, peavy44 said:

I have heard harper wants to go to cubs he told them make there best offer. He would take 4 year deal to go to cubs. The white sox gotta convince him to come to white sox

Harper would have to take an immense and foolish discount if he wanted to sign with the Cubs on a 4 year deal. No way you can turn down the mega $$$$ generational wealth that your family is being offered. I just do not see that happening, pure speculation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chicago White Sox said:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cubs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cubs</a> seem finically tied up, but I would never count them out in a race of a hot top target free agent like <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Machado?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Machado</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Harper?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Harper</a>. Nothings of the table</p>&mdash; Sports Daily (@Sportsdaily079) <a href="https://twitter.com/Sportsdaily079/status/1072783141042040833?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 12, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm trying to do it too, and I'm having the same problems as you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soxbadger said:

 

I could see Harper taking a short offer if its something like 4 years 160 mil+. That way he would only need to get 6 years 200 to hit 10 years 360. 

It seems completely unlikely for a Boras client though as this really is Harpers best time to get a record breaking deal. 

$160M?!? I don't even think he'd take a 4 year deal at $200M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ptatc said:

In 4 years Trout will have signed his new deal and it will probably reset the market.

Hugely depends on how the next 4 season go though. Injuries can happen, poor performance/regression, etc. No way you can bank on a contact 4 years down the line, take the money when you can get it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ptatc said:

4 years isn't out of the possibility. He would probably get opt outs in a contract around that time. He would still be a free agent again at 30.

I don't think you hire Scott Boras to be your agent to take a four year contract instead of a ten year one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, StrangeSox said:

the circled part is the only part you need to copy-paste. you can have the "?ref_src" stuff too but that's just for tracking stuff on twitter's end, you don't need it.

 

OMxY1mZ.jpg

I just tried that and my post just came up as a link. What else am I missing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the chatter changing to "White Sox on outside looking in" and some reports coming out now about Harper preferring other destinations and/or other teams being in the bidding/being favorites my assumption is Harper is looking to get the final best offers from LAD/Cubs/Phillies to see if they can field a competitive offer (compared to the Sox). If so he'll probably sign with one of them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kyyle23 said:

When you hit "copy link" does twitter automatically tell you "link copied" or does it force you to select the url and copy it yourself?

I have two options when I click the "menu arrow" next to the tweet. Those two options are "Copy Link to Tweet" and "Embed Tweet".  I am choosing the Embed option and then only copying and pasting the part that StrangeSox circled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, fathom said:

We all knew the Nightengale cold water tweet was coming. This is less worrisome than expected, as at least there was no talk about year limit or opt-outs.

I'm not predicting the White Sox are going to sign either one of these two stars, but would any source tell him (from the White Sox organization) that the White Sox are actually optimistic or in the lead for signing them? That would be news if he was quoting White Sox sources as saying they are expected too.

In other words, the White Sox may or may not sign Harper/Machado, but the national media expects they're sign with the Yankees, Phillies, Dodgers, or a darkhorse team like the Cubs. Boston would normally be in the mix and teams like Houston/St.Louis probably jump in/out. Teams like the White Sox are never going to be favorites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...