Jump to content

Machado signs with Padres 10/300


yesterday333

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, IowaPG said:

Im just sharing what I heard and joining the conversation . sorry to offend.

Not offending anyone. Just have to understand we've had multiple people over the last week come in & play insider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, fathom said:

I kind of like the ideas that it was Lozano or Boras, but anyone that doesn't think Lozano was calling out the Sox here is in denial.

I dunno. I can guarantee you it wasn’t Lozano admonishing two reporters by name and borderline accusing them for tampering/negotiating through the media because he was the source feeding them the information to begin with. 

I also don’t believe he’s admonishing the Sox here. The risk of alienating them by calling them out publicly is too great. 

This was a response the the SI article that was published. Clearly that angered the Sox FO and they let Lozano hear about it. My guess is they threatened to withdrawal entirely. Thus the strong admonishment of two reporters in particular. 

This could have been handled in a much more benign fashion but clearly was instead intended to be a harsh rebuke of leaks that were hurting his client as well as the Sox’ reputation. 

My guess is the leak came from Philly.

  • Like 1
  • Love 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SoCalSox said:

Not offending anyone. Just have to understand we've had multiple people over the last week come in & play insider. 

I get it. appreciate you pointing that out. Hey Id love to be wrong, for myself and to shove it to Bruce and Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, iamshack said:

I dunno. I can guarantee you it wasn’t Lozano admonishing two reporters by name and borderline accusing them for tampering/negotiating through the media because he was the source feeding them the information to begin with. 

I also don’t believe he’s admonishing the Sox here. The risk of alienating them by calling them out publicly is too great. 

This was a response the the SI article that was published. Clearly that angered the Sox FO and they let Lozano hear about it. My guess is they threatened to withdrawal entirely. Thus the strong admonishment of two reporters in particular. 

This could have been handled in a much more benign fashion but clearly was instead intended to be a harsh rebuke of leaks that were hurting his client as well as the Sox’ reputation. 

My guess is the leak came from Philly.

I don't understand what all your guessing adds except more confusion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...