Jump to content

Machado signs with Padres 10/300


yesterday333

Recommended Posts

Just now, Ross Gload Fan said:

The way this conversation is going you would think they are all sitting at a table right now staring at each other and making offers back and forth, when in all likelihood, they are sitting at home eating chicken wings and not thinking about this for like a week.

He said his decision after new year but never said when lol this can go on til feb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mbs1969 said:

Remember a 250 million offer from Yankeees is worth substantially less in NYC because of their state tax.  The White Sox will get it done. 

I don't even think Yankees wanna go 7 years on Machado more  like 4 or 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBlackSox8 said:

Maybe they could be thinking of trading for and extending him?  Are there any expendable prospects Phillies could give Anaheim?

 

The best player in the universe isn’t generally traded for expendable prospects. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TheBlackSox8 said:

Maybe they could be thinking of trading for and extending him?  Are there any expendable prospects Phillies could give Anaheim?

 

I don’t think the Angels would trade Trout even if I think they should.  

And I don’t believe Philly has the ammo to pull off such a trade off.  Like does Hoskins, Sanchez, & Medina even start a conversation?  That’s their best young player who’s still controllable for quite some time plus their top two prospects. I don’t think that’s even close enough to get a dialogue going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

The best player in the universe isn’t generally traded for expendable prospects. 

I didn't mean it that way. I meant  trading away high-value positional strength in the minors.  Like Sox trading our top pitching or outfield depth...any prospect is expendable for trout is kinda how I meant it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, not that anyone should care, but I’ve switched my preference to Machado over Harper.  Despite feeling strongly about what Bryce could represent for the franchise, several posters here have made compelling cases for Manny and the objective side of me agrees if it has to come down to one.  That being said, I would still somehow love to land both, but am willing to admit it’s a long shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said:

I don’t think the Angels would trade Trout even if I think they should.  

And I don’t believe Philly has the ammo to pull off such a trade off.  Like does Hoskins, Sanchez, & Medina even start a conversation?  That’s their best young player who’s still controllable for quite some time plus their top two prospects. I don’t think that’s even close enough to get a dialogue going.

Thanks, answer I was looking for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I were the Angels and my team was struggling prior to Trout's Free agency, I'd trade him at the break and get a HELL of a lot back from it. Jeez, can you imagine that? 

 

On Machado: Mildly surprised that he didn't sign anywhere in the first week of January, but I expect him to sign this upcoming week. That, to me, was always the prime point. I figured he'd sign in the second week or possibly first.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...