shipps Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, fathom said: Tannehill’s column makes it sound like the other 2-3 moves would be stop-gaps https://670thescore.radio.com/tannehill-5-takeaways-white-sox-soxfest-machado-jimenez-cease That’s what you took from that column? I didn’t read that at all, maybe I have to read it again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 hour ago, Orlando said: Hahn said that there are other players they are talking too that would make us better. That sure sounds like free agency. Who the heck could that possibly be? Marwin? Moustakas? I wouldn't hate a Marwin signing depending on the price. He could be used all around the diamond, and would be useful player - with MM or Harper, or not. At this point, I assume he'll be signed for considerably less than most people thought in November. Also no QO attached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, JoshPR said: The sox should have won more in the early 90s. They were too cheap to pony up for that player to get over the hump. All they did was recycle players that were done or did nothing at all. It was the same in 2000. When instead of getting a pitcher they try to recycle ken hill 2000 White Sox came out of no where to win the division. I'm pretty sure no one expected Ken Hill to be a big acquisition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, shipps said: That’s what you took from that column? I didn’t read that at all, maybe I have to read it again. There’s a direct quote about shorter-term guys to help fill holes on the roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Friday Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: 2000 White Sox came out of no where to win the division. I'm pretty sure no one expected Ken Hill to be a big acquisition. Mike Caruso: Future Star Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigHurt3515 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 I can't believe it is almost February and we are still dealing with this bullshit. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshPR Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: 2000 White Sox came out of no where to win the division. I'm pretty sure no one expected Ken Hill to be a big acquisition. Ken hill was signed mid season to try an bolster the rotation. He was toast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, fathom said: There’s a direct quote about shorter-term guys to help fill holes on the roster. I seen that but I guess I assumed you were referring to Hahns statement that they have 3-4 other moves and connecting what Tanny is saying as those moves being stop gap players. I don’t think Tannehill was saying that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, Blackout Friday said: Mike Caruso: Future Star Mike "Infield Knock" Caruso Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Also, GREEDY had shared a recent interview video of Hahn on mlb network and Hahn referenced they were only interested in long term solutions. What the heck is up with this abrupt change to being interested in multiple stop gaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSouthsider2 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 9 minutes ago, Saufley said: It wasn't JR's fault that the Sox didn't win that 1959 World Series for us and it wasn't his fault the Sox traded away Battey and Romano. I agree with you that we have been disappointed many times. So yes, JR, it's time to do something now and make us happy, for a change. No, JR was not part of the team in 59. Veeck traded away Battey and Romano(He also traded Norm Cash, John Callison, Bubba Phillips, Don Mincher and Barry Latman. JR also was not there in 67 when the SOX lost TWO double headers to second division teams late in September and fell from first to fourth. JR was not there in the 60's where TWO STRAIGHT YEARS we finished ONE game behind the Yankees. But JR HAS been around for about 30 years and we have 2005 and only four other post seasons under his tenure. JR hired Hawk as GM and allowed a HOF manager to be fired, yet stayed with Manuel and Ventura when we had decent teams(especially with Manuel) but won nothing. We got outbid for Tanaka, Gordon, and Cespedes(I admit we dodged a bullet there, but it seems we ALWAYS get outbid). I don't advocate "bidding against themselves". I just would like to see the Sox put forth whatever it takes to bring in this once in a lifetime chance to make the team a winner. Yes, we have "prospects". So far the "prospects" that have come up have disappointed, so I am pretty confident "prospects" alone will get us to another WS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Just now, xSouthsider2 said: No, JR was not part of the team in 59. Veeck traded away Battey and Romano(He also traded Norm Cash, John Callison, Bubba Phillips, Don Mincher and Barry Latman. JR also was not there in 67 when the SOX lost TWO double headers to second division teams late in September and fell from first to fourth. JR was not there in the 60's where TWO STRAIGHT YEARS we finished ONE game behind the Yankees. But JR HAS been around for about 30 years and we have 2005 and only four other post seasons under his tenure. JR hired Hawk as GM and allowed a HOF manager to be fired, yet stayed with Manuel and Ventura when we had decent teams(especially with Manuel) but won nothing. We got outbid for Tanaka, Gordon, and Cespedes(I admit we dodged a bullet there, but it seems we ALWAYS get outbid). I don't advocate "bidding against themselves". I just would like to see the Sox put forth whatever it takes to bring in this once in a lifetime chance to make the team a winner. Yes, we have "prospects". So far the "prospects" that have come up have disappointed, so I am pretty confident "prospects" alone will get us to another WS. LaRussa the most overrated mouthpiece in the history of professional sports. Getting rid of that blow hard was the best thing Jerry ever did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mqr Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, shipps said: Also, GREEDY had shared a recent interview video of Hahn on mlb network and Hahn referenced they were only interested in long term solutions. What the heck is up with this abrupt change to being interested in multiple stop gaps? I think that was more of them saying they aren't going to trade guys for short term answers. It's literally impossible for them to not sign stop gaps at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, mqr said: I think that was more of them saying they aren't going to trade guys for short term answers. It's literally impossible for them to not sign stop gaps at this point. I don’t think he was specific. But if they trade for Joc without signing Manny I will be very confused by Hahns plan or lack there of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xSouthsider2 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 5 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: LaRussa the most overrated mouthpiece in the history of professional sports. Getting rid of that blow hard was the best thing Jerry ever did. How many WS did LaRussa get to? How many did he win? Hawk was a GREAT announcer. He was NOT a GM. It was a personality clash and Hawk won JR's favor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 25 minutes ago, fathom said: Tannehill’s column makes it sound like the other 2-3 moves would be stop-gaps https://670thescore.radio.com/tannehill-5-takeaways-white-sox-soxfest-machado-jimenez-cease As everyone would expect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Relitigating 1959-1985 is exactly where I saw this going 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 6 minutes ago, xSouthsider2 said: How many WS did LaRussa get to? How many did he win? Hawk was a GREAT announcer. He was NOT a GM. It was a personality clash and Hawk won JR's favor. Hawk was awful, but LaRussa was no better. LaRussa was a cheater for one thing - amazing how everywhere he went, big time steroids followed. LaRussa thought he was reinventing the game when analytically speaking he was a moron. LaRussa was as bad a baseball ops guy as Hawk - what he did in Arizona was laughably bad. Managers don't win World Series in baseball; nor do manager "take their team" there. Players do. LaRussa has had some very very gifted players in his career, but his attitude and arrogance were always laughable. Tony always thought he was the smartest guy in the room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hi8is Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Shoot me. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said: Relitigating 1959-1985 is exactly where I saw this going When we correctly understand the moves of 1961 it unlocks the door to get us to the next level to sign Manny, 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Can someone just let it all end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) I’m really curious what people possibly more level headed than me think the chances we land Machado are? I’m saying 30% at this point. Edited January 28, 2019 by Orlando Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshPR Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 Lol man.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 2 minutes ago, Quin said: Can someone just let it all end Preach to Machado or Hahn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 1 minute ago, Orlando said: I’m really curious what people possibly more level headed as me think the percentage we land Machado is? I still think it's a good chance but I don't see it wrapping up until Spring Training starts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts