AJ123 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:58 PM, Stealth G.O.A.T. said: He isn't obligated to explain anything. Expand I understand that, but then why post them at all, I guess? Not trying to be argumentative it’s just that especially as wound up as some of the fan base is, it’s frustrating especially given that he has to know that will get a reaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EL1 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) On 1/28/2019 at 9:56 PM, AJ123 said: I get that and I don’t doubt it..it would just be cool if we didn’t get eyeballs with no explanation at all that just sit out there for days, and then radio silence. Expand I think the whole eyeball thing comes from breaking story with full details that other people are not supposed to know. I'm sure he got in trouble for going into details and was asked to tone it down. Edited January 28, 2019 by EL1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:58 PM, Stealth G.O.A.T. said: He isn't obligated to explain anything. Expand They're also not naive enough to believe that they can post something vague without an army of people jumping to the conclusion that something is about to happen...so when one of them posts open eyeballs or the other one says "They get things done on wednesday", they know how that's going to read. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eminor3rd Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:23 PM, Buehrle>Wood said: While going around baseball twitter, I feel the need to share this tweet from Bill James Expand Bill James has gone completely off the deep end at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hogan873 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:58 PM, Stealth G.O.A.T. said: He isn't obligated to explain anything. Expand And they don't need to risk losing their sources. These guys have connections and share as much as they are comfortable with. Share too much, and they could lose that source. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth G.O.A.T. Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) On 1/28/2019 at 10:04 PM, Balta1701 said: They're also not naive enough to believe that they can post something vague without an army of people jumping to the conclusion that something is about to happen...so when one of them posts open eyeballs or the other one says "They get things done on wednesday", they know how that's going to read. Expand And that's ok..... People can read things however they'd like. People questioning their sources are a little absurd at this point given they both have solid track records. Edited January 28, 2019 by Stealth G.O.A.T. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) What's annoying is when the eyeballs are posted, clearly indicating the/they are not going to share info over Twitter, only for every person who comments on it to ask exactly what it is about, guess which player(s) it involves, etc. like he is suddenly going to confirm it just because they asked. Edited January 28, 2019 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth G.O.A.T. Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:08 PM, hogan873 said: And they don't need to risk losing their sources. These guys have connections and share as much as they are comfortable with. Share too much, and they could lose that source. Expand EXACTLY. If they share something, even if it's something as small as ?, it's legit. Maybe something holds it up. Maybe it falls apart. Maybe it happens. Regardless, people should just be happy to get some info. Especially given how this offseason has been where solid info is concerned. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mqr Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:03 PM, EL1 said: I think the whole eyeball thing comes from breaking story with full details that other people are not supposed to know. I'm sure he got in trouble for going into details and was asked to tone it down. Expand Pretty sure he almost blew up the Shields trade. Shame really. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polar Bear Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:51 PM, Bad Hombre said: WSD has proven to be 100% legit with his sources. He has scooped numerous White Sox transactions the last couple years. Expand The problem is posting x and x. Or hinting at big things coming down on x date. He tries to get eyeballs too much. There is such a thing as leaking legit info not speculative info. Unless his source says the sox just signed Manny or are making an announcement soon, they are most likely just speculating on things. He seems to go out of his way at times to post those speculations bc they gain the most eyeballs, despite knowing they are most likely untrue. I have a problem with this, making posts for eyeballs alone is what turns a lot of people away from him and garners most of his ridicule 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polar Bear Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:12 PM, Stealth G.O.A.T. said: EXACTLY. If they share something, even if it's something as small as ?, it's legit. Maybe something holds it up. Maybe it falls apart. Maybe it happens. Regardless, people should just be happy to get some info. Especially given how this offseason has been where solid info is concerned. Expand But it's not legit, it's his source speculating on things. Unless his sorce his Jerry, Hahn, or KW his source is as good as the janitor that cleans Hahn's office 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:17 PM, Moncada said: But it's not legit, it's his source speculating on things. Unless his sorce his Jerry, Hahn, or KW his source is as good as the janitor that cleans Hahn's office Expand If you knew the info Dave knows today, and hasn’t made a peep about, you’d likely sing a different tune. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiebs13 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:19 PM, iamshack said: If you knew the info Dave knows today, and hasn’t made a peep about, you’d likely sing a different tune. Expand well shack, then what is that news lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polar Bear Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:19 PM, iamshack said: If you knew the info Dave knows today, and hasn’t made a peep about, you’d likely sing a different tune. Expand ???? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:19 PM, iamshack said: If you knew the info Dave knows today, and hasn’t made a peep about, you’d likely sing a different tune. Expand On 1/28/2019 at 10:19 PM, iamshack said: If you knew the info Dave knows today, and hasn’t made a peep about, you’d likely sing a different tune. Expand If he hasn’t said a peep about it, how would you know what he knows? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:20 PM, Kiebs13 said: well shack, then what is that news lol Expand No reason to get you guys riled up. We’ll just let Passan tell you when the time comes. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smellysox Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:07 PM, Eminor3rd said: Bill James has gone completely off the deep end at this point. Expand Yes, and probably overdue for a vacation by the looks of it?! Lol 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 9:40 PM, Soxbadger said: People are really missing the point of the post. It was about why Lozano and Boras historically have been different at negotiators, and why its hard to compare the negotiation of Harper/Machado. If people disagree with that fine, but Boras had JD sit out an entire season. Again, I could have said "MLB" but I presumed most people on this message board would understand the reference. Expand It wasn't an MLB season though. He wasn't being recalled directly to the majors. He missed parts of two MiLB seasons, sort of, as he did play independent ball instead. He held his player out and didn't sign right away, but he didn't sit out an entire season. Again, that is why people are confused. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:23 PM, Dick Allen said: If he hasn’t said a peep about it, how would you know what he knows? Expand Because he’s not the one that told me... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiebs13 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 (edited) On 1/28/2019 at 10:23 PM, iamshack said: No reason to get you guys riled up. We’ll just let Passan tell you when the time comes. Expand if he didn't make a peep how do you know?!?! we've got a conspiracy here! EDIT: and I have seen your other response. I will quit with my sarcastic responses now. Edited January 28, 2019 by Kiebs13 addition 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:24 PM, iamshack said: Because he’s not the one that told me... Expand How would anyone know what he knows if he hasn’t said a peep about it? 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:24 PM, iamshack said: Because he’s not the one that told me... Expand What a twist! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiebs13 Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:26 PM, Dick Allen said: How would anyone know what he knows if he hasn’t said a peep about it? Expand this is also a good point lol ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:26 PM, Dick Allen said: How would anyone know what he knows if he hasn’t said a peep about it? Expand Ever think that maybe people get info at the same time? Technology these days... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted January 28, 2019 Share Posted January 28, 2019 On 1/28/2019 at 10:23 PM, Dick Allen said: If he hasn’t said a peep about it, how would you know what he knows? Expand If a tree falls in the woods........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.