Jump to content

6/23- Sox at Rangers, 2:05, WGN


flavum

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, GermanSoxFan said:

A guy who can play anywhere on the infield with a career .715 OPS has value, 4mil/yr is chump change.

 

You are terrible at posting.

Hahn paid Keppinger $12 million for one year, and it was a terrible season.

 

You fail at logic and reason.

Edited by Moan4Yoan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoxAce said:

That should be game.

Only legit hope would be turning it over to Moncada with a man on. Hoping he runs into one. 

That's assuming we hold them from here... far from a safe bet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fathom said:

Yonder better be off this team come tomorrow. Absolutely no reason for him to be on the roster still.  Ricky can go as well

Exactly Ricky will bench guys cuz he doesn't think they're running hard enough! Yet he keeps trotting Alonzo out there the irony!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This series may be the most frustrating so far. You can point to so many missed opportunities throughout each of the three games. Even the first one, which we won. That win felt like a trip to the dentist. These other two have felt like a colonoscopy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HOFHurt35 said:

Ervin Santana must have been a total dick in the clubhouse to have been cut so early in the process compared to the patience they've had with the rest of this pile of steaming ass of a team.   

He had one of the lowest salaries of the bums Hahn acquired this offseason so he was the easiest to cut loose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HOFHurt35 said:

Ervin Santana must have been a total dick in the clubhouse to have been cut so early in the process compared to the patience they've had with the rest of this pile of steaming ass of a team.   

No doubt. I don't know what was up with that dude from a clubhouse standpoint, but there's no way he could have been worse than Despaigne or Banuelos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Richie said:

No doubt. I don't know what was up with that dude from a clubhouse standpoint, but there's no way he could have been worse than Despaigne or Banuelos. 

He was bad.  He could barely throw over 90.  He was sitting at 90-91 on his fastball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

He was bad.  He could barely throw over 90.  He was sitting at 90-91 on his fastball.

Yeah, you're probably right. He's probably Despaigne in a different form. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...