Jump to content

Predict the Market: FA Contracts


Look at Ray Ray Run

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Two-Gun Pete said:

I'm curious why you believe this.

My view is that, for better or worse, Puig is at least a RFer, not a LFer. And, he wouldn't cost any (scant) trade resources. If others are more correct as to his price than Spotrac and I believe his market to be, why in God's name wouldn't the Reinsdorfs be in on that?

 

Also, one other thing I note about this thread:

Almost ALL of us believe Wheeler to be the better, younger, more ascendant, and with fewer IP SP than Bumgarner.  Almost ALL of us believe that there will be a large degree of interest in Wheeler. Yet, almost all of the predictions posted here project Bumgarner to get a larger contract/more years than Wheeler.

 

Is this wishful thinking on the part of posters here? I see the opposite, in all honesty. I believe Wheeler will get the Cobin contract+, while Bumgarner will get less $/fewer years.

Maybe we should sign Bumgarner and Wheeler just to make sure we cover all the bases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/4/2019 at 7:41 AM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Outside of Bumgarner, Wheeler, Ryu and Strasburg my overall forecasts, and the general consensus for most on this board, are really close to what was projected there.

If those pan out being accurate then give me Ryu ($16M AAV) Hamels ($14M AAV) Moose ($16M AAv) and Grandal ($15M AAV) Add a stopgap RF and a relief pitcher for a combined $15M AAV. That adds $76M to payroll this year. Add Abreu from anywhere from $14M to $18M. What's that bring the payroll to ? $!40M ?

2 years apiece for Ryu and Hamels gives the young starters time to develop or even remove Hamels and sign someone who costs less or just roll with Ryu and the core starters. Then in 2 years lose Moose, Ryu and Hamels to free up payroll that you might commit to extensions to the core or add in others ways. Of course I don't really believe anyone except possibly Hamels signs for only 2 years especially Ryu who I think is being severely undervalued by the amount of times he gets mentioned as a serious guy to sign. It's always Wheeler pretty much. But if Ryu does only get 2 years i think the AAV is higher for a guy who had a damn fine year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reall don't think it is realistic to expect the Sox to sign more than 1 SP on a multi-year deal.  We'll likely get one of Wheeler/Ryu/Madbum/Kuechel, and then a guy on a 1 year deal.  Which is fine - we don't need two long term  SP with Gio, Cease, Kopech, Lopez, Rodon, and even Dunning.  We need 1 long term SP, plus someone to eat some early innings while Kopech gains his footing, and as injury insurance for later in the season.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ChiSox59 said:

I reall don't think it is realistic to expect the Sox to sign more than 1 SP on a multi-year deal.  We'll likely get one of Wheeler/Ryu/Madbum/Kuechel, and then a guy on a 1 year deal.  Which is fine - we don't need two long term  SP with Gio, Cease, Kopech, Lopez, Rodon, and even Dunning.  We need 1 long term SP, plus someone to eat some early innings while Kopech gains his footing, and as injury insurance for later in the season.  

These are good points and I largely agree. That said, it really depends on how the Sox treat Kopech. Hahn has made some hints that they'll keep Kopech down. So I can see a scenario where the Sox sign one of the guys you mentioned and then another average starting pitching that could end up in the pen. Say they keep Kopech down and run out something like this.

1 Giolito

2 Keuchel

3 Cease

4 McHugh/Gibson

5 Lopez

Then end, of May Kopech comes in. Then Rodon and maybe Dunning/Steiver come into play June/July. I dont think Lopez should have a rotation and I dont think they should hold Kopech back but with the injuries and options the different ways they can deploy Kopech there is some serious flexibility that has to be a consideration with Cease/Kopech/Dunning/Stiever and even Giolito to an extent will have innings concerns come August/September.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, raBBit said:

These are good points and I largely agree. That said, it really depends on how the Sox treat Kopech. Hahn has made some hints that they'll keep Kopech down. So I can see a scenario where the Sox sign one of the guys you mentioned and then another average starting pitching that could end up in the pen. Say they keep Kopech down and run out something like this.

1 Giolito

2 Keuchel

3 Cease

4 McHugh/Gibson

5 Lopez

Then end, of May Kopech comes in. Then Rodon and maybe Dunning/Steiver come into play June/July. I dont think Lopez should have a rotation and I dont think they should hold Kopech back but with the injuries and options the different ways they can deploy Kopech there is some serious flexibility that has to be a consideration with Cease/Kopech/Dunning/Stiever and even Giolito to an extent will have innings concerns come August/September.

I like the way you're thinking and think this is how the Sox are looking. Keuchel is about what I expect. I also really like Pomeranz as a swing man, really liked what he did for the Brewers out of the pen last yr. I believe Hahn and co. think we already have our aces in Gio, Kopech an Cease and won't be looking at the big name pitchers. I'm pretty much done with Lopez and would love to trade him (if he has any value) but I think we still need him this yr. Not sure about Rodon, is this his last yr. before FA? Can or would we extend him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AJSOX said:

I like the way you're thinking and think this is how the Sox are looking. Keuchel is about what I expect. I also really like Pomeranz as a swing man, really liked what he did for the Brewers out of the pen last yr. I believe Hahn and co. think we already have our aces in Gio, Kopech an Cease and won't be looking at the big name pitchers. I'm pretty much done with Lopez and would love to trade him (if he has any value) but I think we still need him this yr. Not sure about Rodon, is this his last yr. before FA? Can or would we extend him?

He's Boras which never bodes well for the Sox if you wanted an extension. The Sox also have been disappointed in his dedication to his body (as has Boras Corp) so I don't really see the Sox extending him. Of course, it really depends on his last year and a half with the team. If he finds some of the ace potential and actually stays healthy it could change things. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2019 at 11:38 AM, BackDoorBreach said:

There is 0 reason to add 2 multi year SP.  They need to get a #1 or #2 and a cheap innings eater on a 1 year deal because of the Kopech uncertainty.  Anything more is a waste of limited JerryBux

There is because it opens up the possibility of a trade of either Lopez or Cease. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

There is because it opens up the possibility of a trade of either Lopez or Cease. 

The Sox aren’t going to trade Cease. 98% chance they don’t trade Lopez either, but at least that one I could see as part of a much larger deal if that presented itself. Sox need both of those guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ChiSox59 said:

The Sox aren’t going to trade Cease. 98% chance they don’t trade Lopez either, but at least that one I could see as part of a much larger deal if that presented itself. Sox need both of those guys. 

I really don't know how much value Lopez even has.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said:

Lopez has plenty of value.  25 year old pitchers with above average stuff that already have two 185+ IP seasons under their belt don't grow on trees. 

While I agree he has some good potential... 4.63 FIP and 5.04 FIP do in fact grow on trees.  I would be surprised if he has much value.  Certainly not enough value to trade him.  I would imagine we would get pennies.  I think a Lopez for Mazara trade is realistic and about what his value would be.  I would NOT make that trade due to his potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cjgalloway said:

While I agree he has some good potential... 4.63 FIP and 5.04 FIP do in fact grow on trees.  I would be surprised if he has much value.  Certainly not enough value to trade him.  I would imagine we would get pennies.  I think a Lopez for Mazara trade is realistic and about what his value would be.  I would NOT make that trade due to his potential.

lol wat?

Reynaldo produced more fWAR in 2019 than Mazara has in his entire career.  Plus, Lopez has 2 additional years of control compared to Mazara.  These two are no where near similar in values.

FWIW, Reynaldo was 14th in fWAR in the AL in 2019, and 19th in 2018. Guys like Reynaldo have a fair deal of value - sure he is frustrating to watch as a fan because he's wildly inconsistent and seemingly has a lot of untapped potential. 

To be clear, I am not at all suggesting the Sox should trade Lopez.  You responded to a post in which I stated 98% chance the Sox don't trade him (they need him). But to suggest Reynaldo has no value and is basically a change of scenery candidate is a really ill-informed take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, cjgalloway said:

While I agree he has some good potential... 4.63 FIP and 5.04 FIP do in fact grow on trees.  I would be surprised if he has much value.  Certainly not enough value to trade him.  I would imagine we would get pennies.  I think a Lopez for Mazara trade is realistic and about what his value would be.  I would NOT make that trade due to his potential.

I'd much rather have four years of control over Lopez than two years of Mazara right now. Lopez could take the next step and develop into a quality starter, or even hang around long term as a backend starter. That has value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎11‎/‎1‎/‎2019 at 3:54 AM, Sarava said:

For sure. But there's definitely a chance they don't want him back. Would Theo swallow his pride and trade him back to the Sox? Or does that stir up too much bs for him?

Quintana straight up for Jonathan Stiever.

Who says no?

For the OP - most of the prices seem about right. I thought Puig's was actually too high. I'm going to be annoyed if the Sox sign Puig.

I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...