Bob Sacamano Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Orlando said: There is no doubt in my mind that the Sox were given a number that would quickly end negotiations. I think the same happened with Grandal and they met it. Even if true, the "sign me now in November" price could be like 6/$130 mill for all we know. It would be stupid for them to say "we will sign now for 5/100" when that offer is likely there in December and January. Edited December 4, 2019 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, Balta1701 said: How many teams this decade have won the world series without a pitching contract that is too long or too much money (or several)? I can give you the Royals. What crazy, wasteful contract have the Astros signed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saufley Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 15 minutes ago, maloney.adam said: Here we go again! The sky is falling when it’s only the start of the offseason. deja vu all over again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, soxfan2014 said: While true, the "sign me now in November" price could be like 6/$130 mill for all we know. Doesn't seem like that number is that far from what he'll actually get as of now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 12 hours ago, SoxAce said: Just hate that the Sox are leaked so much in this which is giving me pessimism that they'll get it done. Their track record is terrible in that department. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 2 minutes ago, soxfan2014 said: While true, the "sign me now in November" price could be like 6/$130 mill for all we know. It would be stupid for them to say "we will sign now for 5/100" when that offer is likely there in December and January. Lol people thinking the bidding process works like an Ebay auction. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Balta1701 said: Doesn't seem like that number is that far from what he'll actually get as of now. Then zero reason for him to accept in November. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) We don't know what the Sox offered, so we don't know if they overeplayed their hand. But last year they low-balled; hopefully they didn't this year. And no, he isn't worth twice what other guys are worth; but they don't need those other guys - they need a TOR guy. The Nats overpaid for Corbin and won a title. And since the Sox don't adhere to many of the practices of winning organizations, it's okay with me if they don't adhere to the "not-overpaying" practice as well. Edited December 4, 2019 by GreenSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: What crazy, wasteful contract have the Astros signed? Wake me when the sox get 1/10th the scouting and development environment that the Astros have. We are also too busy trading away our international money to save 5 million dollars here and there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: Lol people thinking the bidding process works like an Ebay auction. Lol I don't think it does. I meant to say "even if true" rather than "while true." Back to the topic. The Sox haven't screwed up anything. Can't force a guy to sign in November when he has a ton of suitors. Edited December 4, 2019 by soxfan2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maloney.adam Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, oneofthemikes said: The amount of time left in the offseason is inconsequential here. The point is that the Sox aren't going to make a run at Cole or Strasburg and Wheeler is the most desirable option outside of those two. Once he is gone, it's not like the amount of time left in the offseason is going to make better pitchers appear in free agency. If we miss on Wheeler, we're going to end up with more half-measures that don't put this roster over the top. How do you know that the Sox won’t try to make a run for Strasburg or Cole? Do you have any sources saying this? Edited December 4, 2019 by maloney.adam 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: What crazy, wasteful contract have the Astros signed? They traded for a couple. At the time they got Verlander, most didn't anticipate his rejuvenation, at least to the level he is at. And Grienke wouldn't get paid what he is owed if he was a free agent today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, maloney.adam said: How do you know that the Sox won’t make a run for Strasburg or Cole? Do you have any sources? Common sense and basic logic 101. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said: Sounds to me like Phillies went to 6. Sox should try to get creative - maybe an opt out after 3 years instead of going to 6. 6 years for a guy with his injury history and for a guy who really relies heavily on throwing 98 mph is pretty risky. It has to be after Year 4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 minute ago, southsideirish71 said: Common sense and basic logic 101. And Stone confirmed the Cole thing, as he’s turned into the mouthpiece of the organization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, fathom said: And Stone confirmed the Cole thing, as he’s turned into the mouthpiece of the organization. What Cole thing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Look at Ray Ray Run Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, Dick Allen said: They traded for a couple. At the time they got Verlander, most didn't anticipate his rejuvenation, at least to the level he is at. And Grienke wouldn't get paid what he is owed if he was a free agent today. They certainly didnt trade for 6 years of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, cjgalloway said: What Cole thing? The, the White Sox will not be negotiating with Scott Boras for Gerritt Cole thing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Dick Allen said: The, the White Sox will not be negotiating with Scott Boras for Gerritt Cole thing. That kills Dallas Keuchel then as well. So if they swing and miss here it gets ugly real quick on options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlsoxfan Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Of course the sky is falling. Its last year all over again. Our track record is not so good with top end free agents. Hopefully something changes today. If not we are jumping off the bridge together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, Dick Allen said: How soon do we hear about how JR stepped up and made an unprecedented offer again that fell short? I do fear Wheeler is a one or two year guy though. So this failure may be a blessing. Personally, I wouldnt go six years on wheeler. I dont blame them if that's where it goes. 5 is iffy but would be a consideration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 guys as someone who walked away from the white sox for a year after the machado/harper debacle.... I don't think overpaying Wheeler is what we want to get upset about. let's just see what happens and how much his contract is before we jump off the cliff :). Wheeler may be the best option for us in Free agency this year, but he's definitely got a lot of warts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whisox05 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 I would be fine passing at 6 years.. But almost anything in the 5 year range would be bitter if we don't beat the offer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted December 4, 2019 Share Posted December 4, 2019 Lol, a lot of whining in here today. Relax fellas. Honestly if Wheeler approaches Corbin territory, give me Ryu. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.