Jump to content

Betts to Dodgers


Whisox05

Recommended Posts

Just now, SonofaRoache said:

Steele Walker isn't good at this point. 2 years and possible extension of good player who was an elite prospect is better than 6 cheap years of a long shot. 

You realize that the extension argument is extra silly since it is also possible to "Sign guys as free agents"? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Balta1701 said:

You realize that the extension argument is extra silly since it is also possible to "Sign guys as free agents"? 

I'm not making any argument. I'm just saying we shouldn't be upset we traded for Mazara IF he turns out to be real good. Those two years would be more valuable than 6 from Walker. It would also mean for 2 years we have a top 5 lineup in the AL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SonofaRoache said:

Steele Walker isn't good at this point. 2 years and possible extension of good player who was an elite prospect is better than 6 cheap years of a long shot. 

You don’t think it’s possible that Walker becomes a sub-.800 OPS guy in the majors, just like Mazara?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

You don’t think it’s possible that Walker becomes a sub-.800 OPS guy in the majors, just like Mazara?

The premise here is IF Mazara becomes worthy of an extension. I don't like him that much, but that was the debate. If he in fact becomes that good, then yes it would be better for us than having Walker for 6 years. Especially if we extend him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, soxfan2014 said:

Dodgers can still pull it off by themselves. Doesn't seem necessary for it to be a 3-team deal honestly. 

Seems like Boston specifically wanted “mlb ready” guys, Dodgers may not want to give away any of their pitching like that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthWallace said:

Does NOT St*ve read this board and then just throw shit out on Twitter?

Not sure what Maeda does for the Sox at this point vs what would have to given up.  Same goes for Joc if his previous cost was Bummer. 

Isn't it obvious that the Sox would give up Gio Gonzalez thus having had him 3 times without ever playing for the Sox ?  ?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...