Jump to content

More pics


KipWellsFan

Recommended Posts

In peru, they killed a defenseman for kicking a goal in his own net..... I have a feeling something like this might happen with a yuppie trying to catch a foul ball.

I think it was Colombia. Also because I think it allowed the US to beat them in the 94 World Cup. This kid certainly better keep a low profile for the next few years.

 

They should bring out Jeffrey Mayer and interview him for kicks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In peru, they killed a defenseman for kicking a goal in his own net..... I have a feeling something like this might happen with a yuppie trying to catch a foul ball.

Murcie, it was in Colombia and the Medellin drug dealers was who kill the guy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys give me some perspective on this play. Was the ball going to hit on top of that wall or railing? I haven't seen the replay on TV but in the pictures it looks like Alous mitt was over that wall, if so that play is NOT fan interference, no matter if Alou could catch the ball or not. That is considered no mans land right there, and it is anybody's ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys give me some perspective on this play.  Was the ball going to hit on top of that wall or railing?  I haven't seen the replay on TV but in the pictures it looks like Alous mitt was over that wall, if so that play is NOT fan interference, no matter if Alou could catch the ball or not.  That is considered no mans land right there, and it is anybody's ball.

I saw the play and i think that Alou could have caught that ball...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the play and i think that Alou could have caught that ball...

That is the whole point. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF ALOU CAN CATCH THE BALL. If the ball is over the top of that wall it is considered out of play and it is fair play for anyone. Was the ball over that wall, or was it in play????? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to say where it was going to land. It looked the ball was headed for the seats at first but wind was pushing back towards the field. Had no one touched it, it looked like it was headed for that railing or maybe just inside the railing on the field. Very hard to say and really an umpire can only do his best to make that call as it is almost purely speculation where it would have landed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK guys give me some perspective on this play.  Was the ball going to hit on top of that wall or railing?  I haven't seen the replay on TV but in the pictures it looks like Alous mitt was over that wall, if so that play is NOT fan interference, no matter if Alou could catch the ball or not.  That is considered no mans land right there, and it is anybody's ball.

Even it was out of play, knowing the situation the Cubs are in and when your own teams player has a chance to make a play, you get out of the way. I've seen it numerous times where fans back off and allow a player to make a catch over the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even it was out of play, knowing the situation the Cubs are in and when your own teams player has a chance to make a play, you get out of the way.  I've seen it numerous times where fans back off and allow a player to make a catch over the wall.

Oh don't get me wrong, that guy is an incredible dumbass. He should not have been reaching for that ball at all. I was just curious because no one seems to be mentioning the actual rule interpretation in that situation. Everyone keeps saying " Alou would have caught the ball", which is immaterial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would have been a highlight play with him (Moises) reaching over the wall and probably making the catch, *in the stands*.

 

As long as the ball was in the stands, and it celarly was from the replay I saw, there is no fan interference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the whole point.  IT DOES NOT MATTER IF ALOU CAN CATCH THE BALL.  If the ball is over the top of that wall it is considered out of play and it is fair play for anyone.  Was the ball over that wall, or was it in play????? :huh:

I downloaded the vid of the LF. It does look like it's over into fan territory where it's anybody's ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh man, I can't believe I feel this bad for a Cub fan in an incident involving the Cubs! It says his number has been disconnected. Sad thing is that it was probably one time friends harrassing him that caused him to disconnect. Or he was just smart and had it done before all the idiots started calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually heard the umpire interviewed this morning. He said that the ball was clearly in the stands and that the fans had a right to attempt to catch the ball. He said it was clear cut--and that he had no doubt the fan had the right to catch the ball. His take? The team SHOULD have just reacted as it normally does when a foul ball is hit into the stands and is not caught. You throw the next pitch and move on. He was very surprised at Alou's and Prior's over-reaction...

 

[No, I didn't watch the game. I don't watch Cub games unless the Sox are wailing on them...]

 

Forkit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...