Jump to content

16 Team Playoffs in 2020 Agreed Upon


KrankinSox

Recommended Posts

I'm fine with this for this year, crazy times call for crazy ideas.

Going forward though, wile I am not really in favor in expanding the playoffs,  I wouldn't hate it either.... as long as there are byes or 5 game series at minimum! Baseball is just way too random to rely on short series in the playoffs, especially after playing at least twice as many regular season  games as any other major US sport.

But to do that, you almost certainly have to shorten the regular season. Weather is already a major issue in the early season, and the World Series is touching November as is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, gusguyman said:

I'm fine with this for this year, crazy times call for crazy ideas.

Going forward though, wile I am not really in favor in expanding the playoffs,  I wouldn't hate it either.... as long as there are byes or 5 game series at minimum! Baseball is just way too random to rely on short series in the playoffs, especially after playing at least twice as many regular season  games as any other major US sport.

But to do that, you almost certainly have to shorten the regular season. Weather is already a major issue in the early season, and the World Series is touching November as is. 

 

I'd like nothing more to go to a 150 game season and expand playoffs to best of 7-7-9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, chitownsportsfan said:

You might as well just flip a coin honestly.  In a 3 game series a 100-62 team against a 62-100 team will lose it roughly 35% of the time.  This is beyond parody imo of even the biggest Manfred doom porners, including me.

I don’t like your math here. Assuming the 100 win team has a 61.7% of winning each game and the 62 win team has a 38.3% of winning each game, the 62 win team would win the 3 game series 32.7% of the time. But it’s even lower than that because you can’t just say a team that is 100-62 will win 61.7% of their games. They did win that percentage of games in the regular season, but that was against a wide range of opponents. When playing a 62-100 team, their chances of winning an individual game has to be higher than 61.7%. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SoxBlanco said:

I don’t like your math here. Assuming the 100 win team has a 61.7% of winning each game and the 62 win team has a 38.3% of winning each game, the 62 win team would win the 3 game series 32.7% of the time. But it’s even lower than that because you can’t just say a team that is 100-62 will win 61.7% of their games. They did win that percentage of games in the regular season, but that was against a wide range of opponents. When playing a 62-100 team, their chances of winning an individual game has to be higher than 61.7%. 

Jesus christ dude I quick and dirtied it.  But thanks for doing the actually math I couldn't find the T-82 this morning.  The point I was making is of course unchanged.  The horrible, no good team more than a 1/4 of the time will win over a monster, because SSS.

Edited by chitownsportsfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2020 at 8:12 PM, SoxAce said:

This basically makes us a lock now IMO.

I don't know about that. Our pitching staff still has an abundance of question marks, not as many if Gio and Keuchel are great. A healthy/recovered Gio could stabilize that bullpen and I'm hoping our closer has a good year. It is far from certain we'll have lights out closer and setup. Our pitching staff certainly has enough bodies with strong potential for Coop to work with. Our pitching staff if it blossoms and is developed properly could make us a powerhouse going forward with some of the stars we have on the field and the fact we have one of the best catchers in the game. We may be close to a lock to make the playoffs. One thing is certain. Coop has the bodies. Time for him to work his magic.

i'll take the expanded playoff format one year if it means we get in.

Edited by greg775
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, chitownsportsfan said:

Jesus christ dude I quick and dirtied it.  But thanks for doing the actually math I couldn't find the T-82 this morning.  The point I was making is of course unchanged.  The horrible, no good team more than a 1/4 of the time will win over a monster, because SSS.

Sorry to get all mathematical on you, but you have inspired me to dig even deeper into this!  Let’s say the top seed has a 70% chance to win each individual game in their series. They would have an 83.7% chance to win a 5 game series and a 78.4% chance to win a 3 game series. As you can see, shrinking it to 3 games doesn’t really affect the outcome much. 

And if you think 70% is too generous, I calculated it again assuming the top seed has a 60% chance to win each game. In that case, the top seed would win a 5 game series 68.2% of the time and a 3 game series 64.8% of the time. Once again, there’s not much difference when you shrink it to a 3 gamer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, SoxBlanco said:

Sorry to get all mathematical on you, but you have inspired me to dig even deeper into this!  Let’s say the top seed has a 70% chance to win each individual game in their series. They would have an 83.7% chance to win a 5 game series and a 78.4% chance to win a 3 game series. As you can see, shrinking it to 3 games doesn’t really affect the outcome much. 

And if you think 70% is too generous, I calculated it again assuming the top seed has a 60% chance to win each game. In that case, the top seed would win a 5 game series 68.2% of the time and a 3 game series 64.8% of the time. Once again, there’s not much difference when you shrink it to a 3 gamer. 

I think you have to factor in a game 1 upset. The 100 win team is in BIG trouble if they slip up in game one. The pressure turns on quickly as they face elimination. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, flavum said:

In- Yankees, Twins, Astros, A’s, Rays

Out- Blue Jays, Orioles, Red Sox, Tigers, Royals, Mariners 

Playing for 3 spots- White Sox, Indians (one or two in), Angels, Rangers

I’ll say Rangers last out

https://www.fangraphs.com/standings/playoff-odds
They have White Sox, Red Sox, Angels and Rangers fighting for 3 of 4 spots

With Trout on the shelf though, huge advantage to both Sox and the Rangers if they can ever get fans into new ballpark.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...