Jump to content

Offseason Targets


soxfan49

Recommended Posts

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:00 PM, smellysox said:

Im not sure i want to get involved with Darvish.  That's alot of $$$ for a pitcher entering his 34, 35, and 36 age year. Not to mention the prospects he would require. 

Expand  

Looks like ownership has a mandate to cut payroll.  Not sure how much leverage they will have push comes to shove.

Edited by SouthWallace
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:07 PM, maloney.adam said:

Ok so if you had to choose between Darvish, Lynn and Marquez. Who would you take and why? 

Expand  

Darvish +100..  Lynn I dont have much interest trading a top prospect for 1 year.  And Ithink we are vastly overvaluing Marquez.  But if we aren't adn that's really his value, I don't want a part of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 8:51 PM, South Side Hit Men said:

I see the Dodgers, and possibly the Mets as the only players for Darvish. If the Cubs have a total rebuild, they will want to couple Darvish with Hayward, and those two teams are the only two with the ability and possible desire to eat that level of salary and related “luxury” tax heading into 2021.
 

If it’s a pure baseball deal for Darvish, I’d quiver at what the Sox would have to give up. Madrigal would not be enough straight up, maybe a second piece.

Expand  

Why would the Cubs want Madrigal?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:10 PM, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

Darvish +100..  Lynn I dont have much interest trading a top prospect for 1 year.  And Ithink we are vastly overvaluing Marquez.  But if we aren't adn that's really his value, I don't want a part of it.

Expand  

I agree. I think we would be giving up too much for a one year rental in Lynn unless we think we can sign him to a contract. Marquez is interesting but is he worth giving up assets for and someone that will be a difference maker for this team in the playoffs? I don’t think so. 

Edited by maloney.adam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:44 PM, smellysox said:

I don't. I think we would take on his salary.  That's why I was hoping it then would mean lighter return of prospects to them.

Expand  

Of course we would take on his salary. Its quite reasonable. My sense is Cubs will want to package him with a less reasonable salary like Kimbrel, in which case we might insist on cash back. I could see Darvish and Kimbrel plus cash for Cease and fillers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:38 PM, Flash said:

I've been banging the Darvish drum for over a month but Cubs will want pitching, most likely beginning with return of Cease. Plus...there will be strong competition for Darvish. 

Expand  

I'd much rather lead a package with Cease than Madrigal

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:37 PM, smellysox said:

Do you think a Madrigal, Thompson, and like Ty Johnson gets this done? Considering the cash involved 

Expand  

Nope...a team like the Angels could offer a much better prospect like Marsh.  Cubs have no use at all for Madrigal.  Mets and Twins would also be interested in Yu, IMO.

Edited by fathom
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/17/2020 at 9:54 PM, fathom said:

Nope...a team like the Angels could offer a much better prospect like Marsh.  Cubs have no use at all for Madrigal.

Expand  

I don't think many would consider Marsh a "much better prospect".. Maybe a better prospect to some, but much better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...