Jump to content

Official: McCann is a Met, $40/4 years


Buehrle>Wood

Recommended Posts

  On 12/10/2020 at 9:20 PM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

My favorite is he'll just glance over these actual facts because his eyes saw what they saw lol.

Expand  

It's really bizarre. McCann certainly does some things better than Grandal, I don't think anyone would deny that. But claiming that "the data" shows he's better offensively, or that he doesn't register any catchers interference errors, is either just straight up lying for no reason or a complete inability to look at even the most basic of numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 9:23 PM, Jose Abreu said:

It's really bizarre. McCann certainly does some things better than Grandal, I don't think anyone would deny that. But claiming that "the data" shows he's better offensively, or that he doesn't register any catchers interference errors, is either just straight up lying for no reason or a complete inability to look at even the most basic of numbers

Expand  

I must have been misrembering the catcher interferences I didn’t look it up. My mistake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 9:34 PM, Vulture said:

I must have been misrembering the catcher interferences I didn’t look it up. My mistake

Expand  

No worries. Just not really sure where that leaves you, if you'd agree that Grandal is better offensively and McCann is the one who commits the interference errors.

My opinion is that McCann calls better games, and is slightly better when it comes to avoiding bonehead errors like dropping pop-ups and whatnot (I say slightly because of the catcher's interferences and because he'll drop one every now and then himself, just not as frequently as Grandal). But I think Grandal is better offensively and is a better framer, which is why I think he's superior overall

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 9:38 PM, Jose Abreu said:

No worries. Just not really sure where that leaves you, if you'd agree that Grandal is better offensively and McCann is the one who commits the interference errors.

My opinion is that McCann calls better games, and is slightly better when it comes to avoiding bonehead errors like dropping pop-ups and whatnot (I say slightly because of the catcher's interferences and because he'll drop one every now and then himself, just not as frequently as Grandal). But I think Grandal is better offensively and is a better framer, which is why I think he's superior overall

Expand  

I still don’t think Grandal is better offensively significantly enough at this point (118+ vs 114) or that three catcher interferences in regular season vs one in playoffs at crucial juncture is enough to make up the difference between the more important aspect of catching AND the value returned in trading Grandal AND the difference in salary
 

2.82 cera vs 4.74

giolito alone can’t account for that difference when that is .66 better than giolitos overall era and McCann caught rookies at a higher rate while Grandal had more starts with the pitcher who had by far the best era on the staff

this holds over from ‘19 as well when Grandal had 4.62 cera compared to 3.87 for other milwaukee catchers while McCann was again over a run better than other catchers for sox 4.40 vs 5.52

with gio pitching 12% of innings pitched, he alone can’t account for that difference

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 10:27 PM, Vulture said:

Defensive war since ‘19:

mccann 1.7

grandal -0.5

Total

mccann 4.9

grandal 3.0

Projected salary

mccann 10.5

grandal 18.5

return for loss of player

mccann none

grandal ?

Expand  

Are you cherry picking 2019 because the year before that McCann had a. 581 ops? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:04 PM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Hes also using b-ref defensive WAR which doesn't account for framing. 

Expand  

You’ve already been proved wrong on that claim. At least I actually read the responses that show when I’m wrong and subsequently acknowledge them. Previously you claimed in another argument you only used FAngraphs war for pitchers anyway.

Edited by Vulture
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:09 PM, Vulture said:

You’ve already been proved wrong on that claim. At least I actually read the responses that show when I’m wrong and subsequently acknowledge them. Previously you claimed in another argument you only used FAngraphs war for pitchers anyway.

Expand  

Wrong on what claim?

Bref uses framing in their DRS calculation somewhere not their defensive WAR calculations.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_comparison.shtml

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:13 PM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Wrong on what claim?

Bref uses framing in their DRS calculation somewhere not their defensive WAR calculations.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_comparison.shtml

Expand  

On the claim that bref doesn’t use framing in their calculation.
 

Framing is used in their drs calculation. Drs is used in war calculation. Therefore framing is used in their war calculation.

there’s obviously something wrong with their equations if a pitcher with an era+ of 123 in 25% more innings of work is given half the war of a pitcher with a 80+, which is replacement level, as was the case in your Loaiza Lynn comparison in which you claimed you used bref for batters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:13 PM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Wrong on what claim?

Bref uses framing in their DRS calculation somewhere not their defensive WAR calculations.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/about/war_explained_comparison.shtml

Expand  

Did you even read the link you provided?

“Uses measures for catcher defense including blocking pitches and framing:

Fangraphs :yes on blocking, but no on framing

bref: yes, DRS”

looks like you’ve got it backwards

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:49 PM, Vulture said:

Did you even read the link you provided?

“Uses measures for catcher defense including blocking pitches and framing:

Fangraphs :yes on blocking, but no on framing

bref: yes, DRS”

looks like you’ve got it backwards

Expand  

Yes, DRS, not dWAR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:51 PM, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Yes, DRS, not dWAR.

Expand  

I’m quoting the graph you linked that clearly states fangraphs war calculation does not take framing into account and bref does via its inclusion of drs in its war equation.

where it says “uses measures...” that is referring to war calculations

Edited by Vulture
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:52 PM, Vulture said:

I don’t disagree. three or more seasons ago grandal was the better catcher

Expand  

So in 2019 one catcher was viewed as a top 3 catcher in baseball and the other was viewed as an all star for the first half of the year and then a flame out. One had an OPS+ of 119 in 2019 and the other 108 after a scorching hot start to 2019. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:54 PM, Vulture said:

I’m quoting the graph you linked that clearly states fangraphs war calculation does not take framing into account and bref does via its inclusion of drs in its war equation.

where it says “uses measures...” that is referring to war calculations

Expand  

fWAR captures framing, bWAR does not

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:54 PM, Vulture said:

I’m quoting the graph you linked that clearly states fangraphs war calculation does not take framing into account and bref does via its inclusion of drs in its war equation

Expand  

I honestly think you have to be trolling me by now.

On Bref - you can hover over the stat and it will tell you what it includes.

When you hover over Rdrs (Defensive runs saved) it tells you it specifically INCLUDES framing. When you hover over dWAR it SPECIFICALLY states it uses the OLD DRS calculation that DOES NOT include framing. Can you please stop quoting me now, my head is starting to hurt.

Regarding fangraphs, I AM NOT citing Fangraphs fWAR. I am specifically citing their DEF rating which includes framing. Jaysus christ man.

There is no gotcha moment here; you just simply do not even understanding what you're citing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 12/10/2020 at 11:56 PM, Chicago White Sox said:

fWAR captures framing, bWAR does not

Expand  

bWAR now captures framing; because instead of taking their dWAR rating they now use a DRS calculation in their WAR calculation. This was updated recently.

The problem is this guy is citing dWAR from B-Ref and doesn't understand that calculation does NOT include framing and does not use the updated DRS calculation that does include framing. I honestly get that this shit can be complicated, but Jeeze man to constantly tell me I'm wrong over and over when the guy is just misunderstanding is wild stuff ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...