Jump to content

MiLB Rule 5 on Wed


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

On 12/7/2021 at 7:26 AM, Dick Allen said:

I didn't know they dropped it to 24 back in the 80s, but 25th man is a minimum salary guy and the minimum salary in 1989 was $68k. Shows how ridiculous that was.

Next time an ownership will be forced to sell because they did a crappy job managing their baseball finances will be the first. A couple have had to sell because of issues outside MLB business. 

24 was NL only I recall. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

So would the setup be that Fulmer was eligible to declare himself a free agent but passed, leaving himself renewed with the Tigers?

I have to imagine that he hasn't amassed enough time to be a free agent, otherwise he would have gone out on his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, poppysox said:

Someone always thinks they can handle those problems.  Only takes 1.

What's the market for a DH-only with ego problems and a .729 OPS last year, and tried retiring and going to Japan at different points because he didn't like what the White Sox were telling him?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, southsider2k5 said:

What's the market for a DH-only with ego problems and a .729 OPS last year, and tried retiring and going to Japan at different points because he didn't like what the White Sox were telling him?

One thing for sure...the market will be better than before the NL approves the DH.  His unbelievable April still impressed a lot of people.  If you own a poor franchise it can be a cheap marketing kind of pickup.  Back in our rent-a-player days with Veeck, he would have been perfect.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, poppysox said:

One thing for sure...the market will be better than before the NL approves the DH.  His unbelievable April still impressed a lot of people.  If you own a poor franchise it can be a cheap marketing kind of pickup.  Back in our rent-a-player days with Veeck, he would have been perfect.

"Better" isn't saying much.  He had a flash in the pan April and then absolutely cratered.  After April he seemed to prove right all of the reasons he never advanced to the majors in the first place.  I don't expect anything at all of substance for the guy.  Honestly, I think he is a waiver waiting to happen when the roster needs to free up a slot.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, poppysox said:

One thing for sure...the market will be better than before the NL approves the DH.  His unbelievable April still impressed a lot of people.  If you own a poor franchise it can be a cheap marketing kind of pickup.  Back in our rent-a-player days with Veeck, he would have been perfect.

A cheap pickup is different from an asset you trade something for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...