Bunt Ritual Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) FWIW, the Met's writer for the Athletic thinks it more likely that J.D. Davis gets move than McNeil. Mainly because he thinks Escobar is going to be used as a 3B instead of a 2B. Edited January 5, 2022 by Bunt Ritual Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Sacamano Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 21 minutes ago, Bunt Ritual said: FWIW, the Met's writer for the Athletic thinks it more likely that J.D. Davis gets move than McNeil. Mainly because he thinks Escobar is going to be used as a 3B instead of a 2B. They still kind of a glut of players, not that Cano should be blocking anyone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 2 hours ago, poppysox said: So what is the realistic price to pay? Crochet. But hopefully they'd bite on something like Cespedes/Burger, Thompson/Dalquist and Rodriguez/Ramos. Doubtful, but a guy can dream. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Bunt Ritual said: FWIW, the Met's writer for the Athletic thinks it more likely that J.D. Davis gets move than McNeil. Mainly because he thinks Escobar is going to be used as a 3B instead of a 2B. Although I don't know if anyone's actually doing this given the current circumstances, that's the kind of thing you leak to a reporter to tweet when you're trying to drive teams to put a good offer on the table for a guy you're likely to move. "Oh we might not actually move this guy, we might move this other guy, so you better come to us with your best deal!" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 52 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said: Crochet. But hopefully they'd bite on something like Cespedes/Burger, Thompson/Dalquist and Rodriguez/Ramos. Doubtful, but a guy can dream. But if SP is really their goal, Mets may find a better partner unless Crochet is the piece. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 5, 2022 Author Share Posted January 5, 2022 An exercise here is what would you pay for someone coming off of ... .249BA .303OBP .437SLG .740OPS 100OPS+ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenSox Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 (edited) A 30 year old late bloomer whose last 2 seasons were 1.5 and .5 WAR. Yea, but let's send Crochet, one of our best young pitchers, as a starter package. That's the way the way winning organizations do it. Peddle for Peddle. Kimbrel at most, and I wouldn't even do that. Edited January 5, 2022 by GreenSox 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 31 minutes ago, GreenSox said: A 30 year old late bloomer whose last 2 seasons were 1.5 and .5 WAR. Yea, but let's send Crochet, one of our best young pitchers, as a starter package. That's the way the way winning organizations do it. Peddle for Peddle. Kimbrel at most, and I wouldn't even do that. Did you miss 2020 was a shortened season due to COVID? Cause no idea how anyone could think “only 1.5 WAR in 52 games” is somehow bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 42 minutes ago, SCCWS said: But if SP is really their goal, Mets may find a better partner unless Crochet is the piece. I would agree that I don't see McNeil happening without us giving up Crochet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 36 minutes ago, GreenSox said: A 30 year old late bloomer whose last 2 seasons were 1.5 and .5 WAR. Yea, but let's send Crochet, one of our best young pitchers, as a starter package. That's the way the way winning organizations do it. Peddle for Peddle. Kimbrel at most, and I wouldn't even do that. Got to give to get. McNeil is a much better player than you're giving credit for. No one is jumping up and down to move Crochet, but they aren't going to just hand over McNeil for a pile of trash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 45 minutes ago, GreenSox said: A 30 year old late bloomer whose last 2 seasons were 1.5 and .5 WAR. Yea, but let's send Crochet, one of our best young pitchers, as a starter package. That's the way the way winning organizations do it. Peddle for Peddle. Kimbrel at most, and I wouldn't even do that. His 1.5 WAR was in a 1/3 of a season.. Nice try Rocky Dennis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 10 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said: I would agree that I don't see McNeil happening without us giving up Crochet. I do wonder if you could get him with Kimbrel + a prospect. Burger, Sheets, one of the highschool pitchers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 5, 2022 Author Share Posted January 5, 2022 1 hour ago, GreenSox said: A 30 year old late bloomer whose last 2 seasons were 1.5 and .5 WAR. Yea, but let's send Crochet, one of our best young pitchers, as a starter package. That's the way the way winning organizations do it. Peddle for Peddle. Kimbrel at most, and I wouldn't even do that. Bravo on presenting 52 of 60 games in the context of a full season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjusttyped Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Continuing to subtract valuable long-term pieces from the big league roster to (theoretically) make the 2022 team better is a great way to just shorten your window. If Kimbrel and prospects with non 2022 ETA's aren't enough to get a deal done (it probably isn't), then the Sox should look elsewhere. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxjusttyped Posted January 5, 2022 Share Posted January 5, 2022 Not sure I really see the fit for Burger or Sheets on the Mets roster, anyways. They already have JD Davis and Dom Smith as more established versions of both of those guys. If the Mets were interested in a potentially"expendable" (I don't think he is) player with long-term upside on the Sox ML roster I think it would have to be Crochet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 3 hours ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said: I do wonder if you could get him with Kimbrel + a prospect. Burger, Sheets, one of the highschool pitchers? It’s the Mets so I won’t say anything is impossible, but the Mets would have been in a very high tax bracket in the last CBA. If things don’t change dramatically, this would add $20 million to their payroll without giving them any starting pitching help, which they say they want. And that’s without my normal caveat that Kimbrel isn’t even worth his current contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 14 hours ago, maxjusttyped said: Continuing to subtract valuable long-term pieces from the big league roster to (theoretically) make the 2022 team better is a great way to just shorten your window. If Kimbrel and prospects with non 2022 ETA's aren't enough to get a deal done (it probably isn't), then the Sox should look elsewhere. I agree with this, trying to balance at the major league level is a fools errand. If we go after McNeil, it should be for our lower level pieces. Only add to ML right now, no subtracting, that already happens via FA etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 16 minutes ago, bmags said: I agree with this, trying to balance at the major league level is a fools errand. If we go after McNeil, it should be for our lower level pieces. Only add to ML right now, no subtracting, that already happens via FA etc I am struggling to see how you get a player like this with the lower level pieces available in the White Sox’s organization. What’s the going rate for a guy with a 5 WAR season and on pace for a 4.5 WAR season with 3 years of control and a down season with some injuries? It’s rare enough that there’s no perfect comparison, but you’re typically talking about more than 1 top 100 prospect for that. Again not a perfect comparison, but think of the Quintana deal - 3.5 years of control, previous 5 win season, numbers trending downwards, brought back Eloy and Dylan. Or if Moncada hadn’t signed that contract extension and the White Sox tried to trade him after 2020 (3 years of control left, previous 5 win season, bad year due to illness) without bringing back any top prospects, we would have all been stunned. We discussed a page ago whether there was a bigger mechanical issue with him, and maybe other teams see that and it suppresses bidding, but in the context of other 5 WAR players traded with that much control even Crochet as a headliner seems weak without another strong prospect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squirmin' for Yermin Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 21 minutes ago, Balta1701 said: I am struggling to see how you get a player like this with the lower level pieces available in the White Sox’s organization. What’s the going rate for a guy with a 5 WAR season and on pace for a 4.5 WAR season with 3 years of control and a down season with some injuries? It’s rare enough that there’s no perfect comparison, but you’re typically talking about more than 1 top 100 prospect for that. Again not a perfect comparison, but think of the Quintana deal - 3.5 years of control, previous 5 win season, numbers trending downwards, brought back Eloy and Dylan. Or if Moncada hadn’t signed that contract extension and the White Sox tried to trade him after 2020 (3 years of control left, previous 5 win season, bad year due to illness) without bringing back any top prospects, we would have all been stunned. We discussed a page ago whether there was a bigger mechanical issue with him, and maybe other teams see that and it suppresses bidding, but in the context of other 5 WAR players traded with that much control even Crochet as a headliner seems weak without another strong prospect. I'd be fine with Crochet I think given the way we handled him and what his future will likely be (reliever). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 22 minutes ago, Balta1701 said: I am struggling to see how you get a player like this with the lower level pieces available in the White Sox’s organization. What’s the going rate for a guy with a 5 WAR season and on pace for a 4.5 WAR season with 3 years of control and a down season with some injuries? It’s rare enough that there’s no perfect comparison, but you’re typically talking about more than 1 top 100 prospect for that. Again not a perfect comparison, but think of the Quintana deal - 3.5 years of control, previous 5 win season, numbers trending downwards, brought back Eloy and Dylan. Or if Moncada hadn’t signed that contract extension and the White Sox tried to trade him after 2020 (3 years of control left, previous 5 win season, bad year due to illness) without bringing back any top prospects, we would have all been stunned. We discussed a page ago whether there was a bigger mechanical issue with him, and maybe other teams see that and it suppresses bidding, but in the context of other 5 WAR players traded with that much control even Crochet as a headliner seems weak without another strong prospect. Yeah the Sox may lose out. But teams looking for a sick return don’t usually sell a guy after their worst years. Especially for back end pitching when there is still plenty in FA. It’s all very stupid from their side, but Sox should explore it including 3 way to the few teams not expecting to compete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tnetennba Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 2 minutes ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said: I'd be fine with Crochet I think given the way we handled him and what his future will likely be (reliever). I’m torn. I’d hate to give up Crochet, but a Crochet level reliever is probably easier to find again than a guy like McNeil that fits this teams needs like a glove. It’s a tough call but a move I’d probably make. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 18 minutes ago, Tnetennba said: I’m torn. I’d hate to give up Crochet, but a Crochet level reliever is probably easier to find again than a guy like McNeil that fits this teams needs like a glove. It’s a tough call but a move I’d probably make. The problem is you don’t always find them when you need them. Sox need a great bullpen. If Hendriks goes down, it’s easy to see ours becoming a problem if we trade out crochet too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCCWS Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 8 minutes ago, bmags said: The problem is you don’t always find them when you need them. Sox need a great bullpen. If Hendriks goes down, it’s easy to see ours becoming a problem if we trade out crochet too. You could be right, but also having a hole again at 2nd base is also a problem. I think the FO has a good feeling of where Crochet fits in to the present pitching staff assuming Kimbrel is gone somewhere. So the risk of trading Crochet should be weighed against the benefit of adding McNeil. But also some have said just Crochet may not be enough. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox59 Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 (edited) 16 hours ago, maxjusttyped said: Continuing to subtract valuable long-term pieces from the big league roster to (theoretically) make the 2022 team better is a great way to just shorten your window. If Kimbrel and prospects with non 2022 ETA's aren't enough to get a deal done (it probably isn't), then the Sox should look elsewhere. Who exactly are these valuable long term pieces? There isn't a prospect in Sox top 10, besides maybe Montgomery, I wouldn't trade in a heartbeat to improve this team. Subtracting from the MLB team - ie: Vaughn and to a lesser extent Crochet, and all the other obvious names (Kopech, Eloy, etc.), are a different story. I want to expand this window as much as possible as well. But we're past prospect hoarding days. We barely have any of note to begin with - no prospect should be off limits to improve the club as much as someone like McNeil would. This excludes the names in the 2nd paragraph, but I probably would part with Crochet for McNeil, but would certainly try to get him without including Crochet first. Just don't really see a realistic fit. Edited January 6, 2022 by ChiSox59 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 6, 2022 Share Posted January 6, 2022 11 minutes ago, ChiSox59 said: Who exactly are these valuable long term pieces? There isn't a prospect in Sox top 10, besides maybe Montgomery, I wouldn't trade in a heartbeat to improve this team. Subtracting from the MLB team - ie: Vaughn and to a lesser extent Crochet, and all the other obvious names (Kopech, Eloy, etc.), are a different story. I want to expand this window as much as possible as well. But we're past prospect hoarding days. We barely have any of note to begin with - no prospect should be off limits to improve the club as much as someone like McNeil would. This excludes the names in the 2nd paragraph, but I probably would part with Crochet for McNeil, but would certainly try to get him without including Crochet first. Just don't really see a realistic fit. I think the poster that said "they are more likely to offload davis" makes a lot more sense. But I would add "we are going to trade McNeil for major league pitching" is kind of a dumb idea so I just don't put that much weight into it. They could just take prospects and then mix the new prospects with their own for a better pitcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.