Jump to content

Rosenthal fired for criticism of Manfred


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

The details need to be in more than a click through tweet

Quote

Rosenthal, a top news breaker, was first kept off the air for around three months, according to sources, after he wrote columns in 2020 — with the season in jeopardy due to the pandemic — analyzing Manfred’s handling of the situation for The Athletic. 

There was no stated suspension at the time and it went publicly unnoticed. 

Rosenthal was still paid, but was put in a months-long penalty box. He did return for the trade deadline, which was pushed to Aug. 31 that season due to COVID-19. 
 

In June 2020, Rosenthal’s analysis of Manfred for The Athletic featured some light criticism, but it didn’t appear to delve into anything personal. 

In one piece, Rosenthal wrote, “As if the perception that Manfred is beholden to owners and out of touch with players was not bad enough, he was trending on Twitter on Monday after performing a massive flip-flop.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rosenthal is probably the most professional and well respected person in baseball media.  

This should go over well with fans and the rest of the media, especially with literally no other MLB news to discuss except for the current f’ing lockout.  The current lockout with MLB/owners and Manfred being almost fully responsible.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, southsider2k5 said:

So much for the idea that information is somehow neutral in all of this. Toe the MLB owner line, or get fired.

 

MLB Network is owned by MLB, so Rosenthal was essentially an MLB employee. I don't know any company where you can publicly trash your company's CEO and retain your job.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said:

MLB Network is owned by MLB, so Rosenthal was essentially an MLB employee. I don't know any company where you can publicly trash your company's CEO and retain your job.

Thank you for pointing that out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said:

MLB Network is owned by MLB, so Rosenthal was essentially an MLB employee. I don't know any company where you can publicly trash your company's CEO and retain your job.

How many people's job is to objectively report on your company and bosses?  This is way too simplified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

How many people's job is to objectively report on your company and bosses?  This is way too simplified.

There are other outlets where you can objectively report on MLB though: ESPN, Fox Sports, Sports Illustrated, The Athletic, etc. If you're going to work for MLB Network you have to understand that the rules are a little bit different.

How long do you think Scott Merkin keeps his job if he tweets something trashing Jerry Reinsdorf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said:

There are other outlets where you can objectively report on MLB though: ESPN, Fox Sports, Sports Illustrated, The Athletic, etc. If you're going to work for MLB Network you have to understand that the rules are a little bit different.

How long do you think Scott Merkin keeps his job if he tweets something trashing Jerry Reinsdorf?

The job is unique.  The "rules" should reflect that, versus being PR people for MLB.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

The job is unique.  The "rules" should reflect that, versus being PR people for MLB.

MLB Network's ultimate function is to be PR for MLB though. From your living room, it looks a lot like ESPN or any other network covering MLB, but it really isn't. At the end of the day, MLB is signing your check so you can't go out there and trash them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said:

There are other outlets where you can objectively report on MLB though: ESPN, Fox Sports, Sports Illustrated, The Athletic, etc. If you're going to work for MLB Network you have to understand that the rules are a little bit different.

How long do you think Scott Merkin keeps his job if he tweets something trashing Jerry Reinsdorf?

Merkin would be tweeting and writing articles as part of his job for MLB. In that instance, MLB would be directly paying Merkin for writing words trashing them.

I get Rosenthal was employed by MLB in some capacity, but all of his words and reporting do not belong to MLB. Rosenthal wrote these articles about the lockout/Manfred for the Athletic. There was also nothing inappropriate written about Manfred. It was normal reporting for a guy another company is paying to report.

It’s not like he was on MLB Tonight calling Manfred a b****, as much as I really wish that happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said:

MLB Network's ultimate function is to be PR for MLB though. From your living room, it looks a lot like ESPN or any other network covering MLB, but it really isn't. At the end of the day, MLB is signing your check so you can't go out there and trash them.

Well luckily MLB is more concerned about silencing minimal discent and not actually fixing the game, so I am sure there is plenty to "report" on. 

Except now they screwed the pooch and are the news.  It would have attracted way less attention if they had left him alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...