Jump to content

3/30 | Rangers vs White Sox | 3:05PM CT | NBCSCH


Recommended Posts

  On 3/30/2022 at 11:01 PM, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

yeah, it isn't that far fetched to think he would be better lol.  Good thing we gave 5.5 million for Harrison though.

Expand  

Like it or not, a bench of "Engel, Leury/Romy, unknown possible human being, and backup catcher" has a hole that needs filled, and with his lack of ability to play key defensive positions like SS or OF, Burger isn't a good candidate for that role over a whole season, so there's no one obvious in the org who can do it.

A bench of "Leury, Romy, Engel because we brought in a starting 2b" would also have worked fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/30/2022 at 11:57 PM, maxjusttyped said:

Harrison is still a much better bet to give a ~95-105 wRC+ and just be serviceable than Romy is. Obviously the upside with Romy is higher, and if he's playing well then he should get the job full-time

Expand  

0.3, -0.6, 0.3, 1.5

It's almost the complete opposite of Michael Conforto.

We're totally ignoring his age 30-32 seasons (because that player has zero value for those seasons), then banking on a repeat of his age 33 season.

I miss the days of extrapolating Madrigal numbers into 2-3 fWAR-ish seasons.

Edited by caulfield12
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/31/2022 at 12:27 AM, CentralChamps21 said:

Romy might be better than Harrison this year, but he's had very little time at AAA. Plus, if you go with Romy at 2B, then you have no backup. Now you have Romy as an option if Harrison is bad or gets hurt.

Expand  

Well, basically you have Mendick and whatever comes out of the DFA period this next week and at the end of April as rosters shrink down to normal numbers.

But the odds are, at best, 1 in 4 that you're going to get a 1.5-2.0 fWAR 2B and 75% you're going to have to turn around and replace him again, just like Eaton and Mazara in RF.  All those wasted contract dollars add up, to the point where it would have been much more effective to pay $10-15 million for a longer-term solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/31/2022 at 12:31 AM, caulfield12 said:

Well, basically you have Mendick and whatever comes out of the DFA period this next week and at the end of April as rosters shrink down to normal numbers.

But the odds are, at best, 1 in 4 that you're going to get a 1.5-2.0 fWAR 2B and 75% you're going to have to turn around and replace him again, just like Eaton and Mazara in RF.  All those wasted contract dollars add up, to the point where it would have been much more effective to pay $10-15 million for a longer-term solution.

Expand  

 

  On 3/31/2022 at 12:31 AM, caulfield12 said:

Well, basically you have Mendick and whatever comes out of the DFA period this next week and at the end of April as rosters shrink down to normal numbers.

But the odds are, at best, 1 in 4 that you're going to get a 1.5-2.0 fWAR 2B and 75% you're going to have to turn around and replace him again, just like Eaton and Mazara in RF.  All those wasted contract dollars add up, to the point where it would have been much more effective to pay $10-15 million for a longer-term solution.

Expand  

I concur. If we had a better eye for talent, we might be able to find better cheap talent. The white sox always sign a guy after his best year and are shocked when they 

regress back to the mean. It's called the Keppinger anomaly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...