Jump to content

Josh Hader traded to Padres


Sleepy Harold

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

Profar would be second on the white sox in war.

Is that a compliment to him or an insult to the White Sox? 
 

Not saying he’s bad, just surprising that he’s the best OF’er on a team where the GM makes roster moves and spends $ like he’s playing MLB The Show 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, JoshPR said:

Huh? Aren't the brewers in the hunt?

Hader going to get $15 million in arbitration and thats too much for one player with their payroll limitations in Mil.

Lamet provides a potential starter and swingman…had one great season and injury riddled ever since.

Plus they have a solid bullpen by committee with Devin Williams now getting most opportunities but also matchup based.

Ruiz will be a fourth outfielder, defensive replacement and PR.

 

Very very similar to the idea of Rays trading Choi in the next 24 hours to the Yankees, despite his being their second or third best hitter…or Adames last year, which was a bad trade for the Rays that backfired.  But they won the Ramirez/Paredes deal this year.

All under the radar type moves that never draw headlines.  Diego Castillo to the Mariners last year as well comes to mind.

Players get to Year 1-2 of arbitration and goodbye, with few exceptions.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TheFutureIsNear said:

Is that a compliment to him or an insult to the White Sox? 
 

Not saying he’s bad, just surprising that he’s the best OF’er on a team where the GM makes roster moves and spends $ like he’s playing MLB The Show 

He's the 9th best qualified outfielder in baseball this year by WAR.

Profar has been very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Look at Ray Ray Run said:

He's the 9th best qualified outfielder in baseball this year by WAR.

Profar has been very good.

That contract too expensive for Sox blood, but certainly much better returns than Leury/Harrison combined.  Same with the Kim deal being quite significant.  He’s an excellent defender and solid offensively this year.  Also could have played second for White Sox.

Profar basically saved them with Tatis and Myers out…and Grisham in a puzzling season long slump.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CentralChamps21 said:

Is there a precedent for a team leading their division by 3 games trading away an elite closer?

They got a closer back in the deal plus prospects, pretty nice deal there. I would do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caulfield12 said:

White Sox wouldn't get 2/3rds or even 1/2 of that package for Hendricks because of the unique salary and tax structure, health concerns, age, and gopher ball issues.

 

Hader (7 in 34 innings) has allowed more home runs than Hendriks (5 in 35 innings) this year. In fact, in what's a down year for both of them, Hendriks has been clearly better.

That said, I agree that the weird contract structure would make things tough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Jose Abreu said:

Hader (7 in 34 innings) has allowed more home runs than Hendriks (5 in 35 innings) this year. In fact, in what's a down year for both of them, Hendriks has been clearly better.

That said, I agree that the weird contract structure would make things tough

If you watched Hendricks closely this year, nearly every single save has been a high wire act like Colome two seasons ago.

And Liam now has that red flag out there with the forearm tightness.  Plus, he's older.  Both probably suffering from overuse.

Finally, Hader is much more familiar with the NL.

 

And Hader gave up three homers in basically one inning of the same game 2-3 weeks ago.

Finally, how do you sell the fanbase on competing next year with Graveman, Kelly or Lopez closing?

Hahn would look like an idiot yet again.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, caulfield12 said:

White Sox wouldn't get 2/3rds or even 1/2 of that package for Hendricks because of the unique salary and tax structure, health concerns, age, and gopher ball issues. Rick Hahn would be satisfied with far less.

FTFY

Hendriks is valuable because he is under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, whereas Hader is under contract for a year and two months. 37 year old Bard just got $19M for two seasons.

MLB Trade Values

  • Hendriks $20.6M
  • Hader $15.5M
Edited by South Side Hit Men
Edit - Correcting for what Caufield pointed out. Thanks
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, South Side Hit Men said:

FTFY

Hendriks is more valuable because he is under a reasonable contract for two more seasons, whereas Hader is under contract for two months. 37 year old Bard just got $19M for two seasons.

MLB Trade Values

  • Hendriks $20.6M
  • Hader $15.5M

Hader has 2023 control or never would have made that deal.

 

At any rate could care less if they trade Hendriks.

Just won't invest it in a quality RFer unfortunately.

 

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/san-diego-padres/josh-hader-21236/

2023=arbitration year 4

 

Edited by caulfield12
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Josh Hader has the highest career strikeout rate in baseball history, and while that’s at least a little about the era in which he plays and the way in which he is used, he’s still a 28-year-old who has the highest career strikeout rate in baseball history -- and he’s not even a rental, because the Padres can retain him for 2023, as well.

In case you’re wondering why the Brewers, a team leading the NL Central, might be willing to move him, well, you’re not alone. Maybe they know something we don’t; Hader, for what it’s worth, is in the midst of one of the worst stretches of his career. Maybe they think they can turn Lamet (30 years old) and Rogers (31), each currently struggling, but with not-distant runs of success in their past, into approximations of Hader, and get two prospects for the trouble.

Given that the Padres get the best player in the deal, and that they did it without giving up any of the prospects they needed to get Soto, it’s a clear win there.

 

www.mlb.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...