Jump to content

9/17: Sox at DET, game 2 (5:10c/6:10e)


Eminor3rd

Recommended Posts

  On 9/18/2022 at 1:07 AM, Balta1701 said:

Oh there were serious assholes on that team.

Expand  

It's one thing when your team is populated by Richards, it's another when the entire roster is going through the motions. 

The latter is more unlikable IMO. 

I don't remember who the other Richards were outside of Wells. 

Edited by Jack Parkman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/18/2022 at 1:04 AM, JoeC said:

Which team(s) older than 20 years would you say are less likeable?

Expand  

2003 is close. Most talented team of the last 100 years IMO but no semblance of a 5th starter, no energy under a sleepy manager, Jose Panigua, and a total and utter collapse vs the Twins led to a mediocre team. But yeah this team still probably wins.

Edited by Buehrle>Wood
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/18/2022 at 1:10 AM, Buehrle>Wood said:

2003 is close. Most talented team of the last 100 years IMO but no semblance of a 5th starter, no energy under a sleepy manager, and a total and utter collapse vs the Twins led to a mediocre team. 

Expand  

2003 was just a Jerry special. He wouldn't put them over the top. That one is not on the players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 9/18/2022 at 1:09 AM, Jack Parkman said:

It's one thing when your team is populated by Richards, it's another when the entire roster is going through the motions. 

The latter is more unlikable IMO. 

Expand  

Not hustling and playing generally dumbass baseball is no way to further your fan base in Chicago imo.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...