Jump to content

Your 2023 Off-Season Plan


ChiSox59

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, VAfan said:

I posted this over at the Athletic.  Just want to chime in again to say the Sox cannot be fixed with this group of players. 

*************

Fixing these Sox is a fools errand. Here is the core of the offense:

Jimenez, 140 OPS+, 84 games.
Vaughn, 111 OPS+, 134 games
Robert, 109 OPS+, 98 games
Anderson, 108 OPS+, 79 games
Moncada, 76 OPS+ 104 games
Grandal, 64 OPS+, 99 games

Meanwhile, here's who is gone:
Abreu, 133 OPS+, 157 games
Andrus, 116 OPS+, 43 games
Harrison, 94 OPS+, 119 games
Pollock, 91 OPS+, 138 games

When you realize only one of your core offensive players exceeded 500 ABs, and your two lefties both performed far below replacement level, there isn't much hope of building around these guys. It's based on fantasy projections. These guys weren't just injured one season. All of the top 6 guys have missed time or faded miserably in the last 2 years.

Moreover, the 2 worst hitters in your top 6 are your TWO HIGHEST PAID POSITION PLAYERS. So you really need to move both, as both were outhit in a major way by Jake Burger and Seby Zavala. But who would take their albatross contracts?

If you move Jimenez to DH, as you should, and you don't want 1Bs playing in the outfield, as you should, then what do you do with the ONLY LEFTY ON THE TEAM who actually played and hit major league average, Gavin Sheets? 124 games, 98 OPS+ (108 OPS+ against righties).

What do you do with these guys?
Burger, 112 OPS+, 51 games.
Mendick, 121 OPS+, 31 games
Zavala, 107 OPS+, 61 games
Engel, 64 OPS+, 119 games
Garcia, 42 OPS+, 97 games!!

The Sox have hired the right manager this time. But they do not have a team of players who can stay healthy, field the ball, hit right handers, and be above average.

Meanwhile, look at Cleveland. (Or maybe not, ,unless you want to be depressed.) They have 6 regulars above 100 OPS+, all but Ramirez in their mid-20s, 4 of whom played more than 140 games. And hitting is supposed to be their weakness.

Yes, I think it goes without saying that if you take a bad year and project every trend to continue indefinitely, you're going to see...other bad years.  The Guardians, by the way, could have done the same after last season.  I think people who are hopeful are assuming things will be better next year, as sometimes happens in baseball.

Also, I just want to note that it's mindbending to see the identically-shaped and reasoned posts on the polar opposite ends of the spectrum just a year or so apart.  Are you one of those people who phonebanked for Obama in '12 and stormed the Capitol in '21? ?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, chw42 said:

Yeah, I'm not sure how the Giants see him as worth $20 million a year. 

They have a lot of money. It’s crazy when orgs don’t make the avoidance of paying an injured player the number one priority.

If he doesn’t accept they get an asset.

Voila

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, maxjusttyped said:

Joc, Martin Perez, and Tyler Anderson all seem like pretty good bets to accept. Evoladi probably on the borderline.

Remember how the White Sox had a QO on Abreu and like a couple of days after the deadline they had a contract extension for him done? I wonder if Boston will just use this to get him locked into 2/$30 or something like that in the next couple days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, maxjusttyped said:

Good relievers aren't going to come cheap. The return would be minimal, but it might be possible to trade away Graveman if reallocating $ from the bullpen to fill other needs is a priority.

I would agree he is movable, but he was also worth so much more at the trade deadline last year based on his first half performance. Does saving $8 million really make that big of a difference, when it also does remove a guy who can contribute? If $8 million barely buys you a decent reliever, does that really reshape our plans?

Hold Graveman, sign Kiermaier and Gallo, sign a back of the rotation pitcher or use that as the spot you trade for, and call that the best you can do with only $20 million to work with. That $8 million isn't going to make or break your free agency plan this offseason, and Graveman here or gone won't determine whether this team can come back legit next year - that will still be up to Robert, Moncada, Kopech, Giolito, Jimenez, Anderson, Grandal, etc. Worst case scenario, you decide to be more aggressive moving people at the trade deadline this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Balta1701 said:

Seriously, if you’re selling off Hendriks, he shouldn’t be the only piece you sell. You are creating a genuinely bad bullpen.

If Garrett Crochet can throw 100 mph again after his UCL has been repaired it's the easiest decision ever. You don't spend the 11th overall pick on a reliever and not let him close.

Hendriks vs triple digits Crochet is a wash.  

Edited by Jack Parkman
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

If Garrett Crochet can throw 100 mph again after his UCL has been repaired its the easiest decision ever. You don't spend the 11th overall pick on a reliever and not let him close. 

Crochet would be more valuable as a multi inning reliever, even if he never becomes a starter, than being used as a traditional closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

While true, they need to shed some salary and Hendriks has value to other teams. It's a no-brainer IMO. 

Trading Graveman makes more sense to me than Liam, but if Hendriks is gone, locking yourself into a designated closer if you don't have to doesn't make much sense to me.

Crochet doesn't suddenly become more valuable if he's getting saves as opposed to being a typical high leverage reliever anyways.

Edited by maxjusttyped
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, maxjusttyped said:

Trading Graveman makes more sense to me than Liam, but if Hendriks is gone, locking yourself into a designated closer if you don't have to doesn't make much sense to me.

Crochet doesn't suddenly become more valuable if he's getting saves as opposed to being a typical high leverage reliever anyways.

I'd trade Hendriks anyway and have Graveman and Crochet duke it out for the 9th inning. If Graveman can do the job, that frees up Crochet to be Josh Hader.  It seems like this board is more on the Crochet=Hader train than trading Hendriks. 

Lost in the shuffle is that Kelly was fine after getting healthy. 

Edited by Jack Parkman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jack Parkman said:

If Garrett Crochet can throw 100 mph again after his UCL has been repaired it's the easiest decision ever. You don't spend the 11th overall pick on a reliever and not let him close.

Hendriks vs triple digits Crochet is a wash.  

Carlos Rodon had his surgery in May of 2019. He next threw a competitive pitch in late September of 2020, and he was really terrible at the time. That 16 months isn’t a totally unreasonable schedule, it’s 12 months or more just to heal and then several months more to build back strength on average. You should be prepared for him to not be fully effective until towards the end of the season, if not longer, as it would be unexpected for him to be 100% after only 12 months.

27 year old Luis Severino had the surgery in February 2020. He threw 6 innings in 2021 because a few other things kept being sore.

Syndergaard had it in 2020, threw 2 innings in 2021.

Tyler Beede, March 2020, threw 1 inning in 2021.

Chris Sale, March 2020, still hasn’t avoided injury, came back Mid August 2021.

The only guy I can find in recent years who was back in 14 months was Glasnow, who pitched in 2 games in September and October of this year 14 months after the surgery.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like someone on Twitter came up with a White Sox interested in Segura rumor and all the foodies are jumping all over it.

Also on Twitter, good ole Portillo’s is saying the Sox will “reengage” on Burnes (after being close last winter) but that Woodruff is a more likely outcome.

Oh, and FootlongComiskeydog continues to embarrass himself with the worst attempt at playing fake insider I have ever seen.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, fathom said:

Feels like every scenario or rumored mentioned is doing very little to make the Sox a legit contender again.  

It's difficult to improve your team with a bad GM, an owner who won't increase payroll, and a farm system that's improving but still one of the worst in baseball.

Hopefully improved coaching, better health outcomes, and regression for guys like Yaz, Moncada & Giolito will fix everything.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jack Parkman said:

Lost in the shuffle is that Kelly was fine after getting healthy. 

Missed this last night. 

Kelly’s worst month of the season was August, where he gave up 8 runs in under 7 innings. His 2nd half ERA after getting healthy was 4.87. That is “fine”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

Missed this last night. 

Kelly’s worst month of the season was August, where he gave up 8 runs in under 7 innings. His 2nd half ERA after getting healthy was 4.87. That is “fine”?

I was talking about just September. His command was way better. He was a different pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...