Jump to content

2023 MLB offseason signings and rumors thread


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

51 minutes ago, bmags said:

That is revolting 

Would be even more revolting if he listed how much money they spent on their other FA signings. Graveman was the biggest last year but Leury, Kelly, Velasquez, Harrison then Cueto only because Lynn got injured . Then traded the Kimbrel contract for an even bigger contract for Pollock which he luckily opted out of . That might be the only reason we got Clevinger. Also decided to do Boras, Rodon and the rest of MLB a solid and neglected the White Sox by not giving the QO to Rodon.

Spent a decent amount of money (for them)  last season which resulted in no playoff revenue so JR pulled the plug on spending this year instead of firing Hahn.

 I really think JR ties attendance and playoff money to payroll. I got nothing else.

Edited by CaliSoxFanViaSWside
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Squirmin' for Yermin said:

Syndergaard higher floor, Clevinger higher ceiling. Wash for me

A higher ceiling? Syndergaard once put up a 6 fWAR season, and both were 4 fWAR pitchers in 2018 and 2019. Care to elaborate on how you concluded that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, southsider2k5 said:

 

Three out of the last five years, the largest contract they dished out was for a guy that plays less than half of the games in any given season.  That is f’d up on so many levels …… still trying to process this.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

That is what a forward thinking team would do.  They would improve SS and improve something else.

No, they really wouldn't. A forward thinking team would recognize that their best chance to win is right now because they have multiple guys about to hit free agency in the next 2 years and Tim Anderson playing at his best contributes to winning right now, but they have a hole in the outfield. While it won't be cheap, they therefore either need to spend prospect talent to bring in an outfielder they can afford, or they need to adjust their budget enough to go after the outfielder who could have put them over the top. 

Competitive teams don't commonly give away guys they think will be MLB contributors in the next 1-2 years, even if they're blocked. If a guy can contribute this year, they're going to hold onto him and use his contribution this year. They give away prospects who, even if they're highly ranked, will probably take a couple years to grow into high quality MLB players. You can likely get that in exchange for Anderson, but that is a rebuilding type move. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, southsider2k5 said:

That is what a forward thinking team would do.  They would improve SS and improve something else.

Why would they commit a boatload of money to Swanson when it looks like Montgomery may stick at SS and will cost very little for awhile?

I'm on board with moving Anderson for a haul but I'm not on board with tying up alot of money at SS. We just need a bridge player.

If they have money to spend add a savage LH 2B or OF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

No, they really wouldn't. A forward thinking team would recognize that their best chance to win is right now because they have multiple guys about to hit free agency in the next 2 years and Tim Anderson playing at his best contributes to winning right now, but they have a hole in the outfield. While it won't be cheap, they therefore either need to spend prospect talent to bring in an outfielder they can afford, or they need to adjust their budget enough to go after the outfielder who could have put them over the top. 

Competitive teams don't commonly give away guys they think will be MLB contributors in the next 1-2 years, even if they're blocked. If a guy can contribute this year, they're going to hold onto him and use his contribution this year. They give away prospects who, even if they're highly ranked, will probably take a couple years to grow into high quality MLB players. You can likely get that in exchange for Anderson, but that is a rebuilding type move. 

Better teams don't sign better players and move lesser players?  That is news to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...