Jump to content

Mike Clevinger to Sox per Rosenthal


CWSpalehoseCWS

Recommended Posts

  On 11/27/2022 at 9:49 PM, Chicago White Sox said:

I’d look into moving Stiever into a relief role in all honesty, but that requires adding a couple of arms to fill out the Knights’ rotation.

Expand  

Dudes actually got to pitch before he can settle into a role. You might want him starting for a year just to build arm strength after surgery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:00 PM, Balta1701 said:

Dudes actually got to pitch before he can settle into a role. You might want him starting for a year just to build arm strength after surgery.

Expand  

I just think he’s going to end up a reliever and I think we may need him sooner rather than later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:00 PM, Chicago White Sox said:

I do not understand the Giolito hate at all.

Expand  

The hate is unwarranted...frustration with him is not imo.

He looked like an Ace.  He was absolutely dominating in that playoff start against Oakland.  Now he looks at best like a #4 or 5...that is frustrating.

Edited by wegner
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:22 PM, Vote4Pedro said:

I don’t think it’s much hate just putting 2 and 2 together with the other holes on this roster, his impending free agency and the need for a shake up on the roster. 

Expand  

I don’t think trading Giolito is the appropriate shake-up though.  And one year of a 3+ win pitcher and a draft pick is better than what we’ll get in return for him via trade plus whatever we do with the $10M in savings.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:47 PM, Jerksticks said:

Lol.  Did we suddenly become the Rays?  

Expand  

Have you forgotten who the Sox owner is? 

Everything has to come through that lens.

So basically, the Sox are the Rays but with a higher year to year payroll and a much worse front office and organizational structure. 

Until there's a new owner we should want them to operate that way, yes. 

Edited by Jack Parkman
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:38 PM, Capn12 said:

Most of us aren't hating on Gio because of his performance, I think most of us are realistic enough to know he is gone after 2023 either way. So, why not make a move that makes sense for the team, more long term.

Expand  

If you’re trading Giolito why stop there?

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 11:21 PM, Chicago White Sox said:

If you’re trading Giolito why stop there?

Expand  

Because the only other FA player of signifigance after '23 is Yasmani, and rest assured, there is no one taking that contract right now.

Folks are acting like they've forgotten 40+ years of behavior from current ownership. The status quo isn't going to magically change in 2023/2024.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 11/27/2022 at 10:54 PM, Jack Parkman said:

Have you forgotten who the Sox owner is? 

Everything has to come through that lens.

So basically, the Sox are the Rays but with a higher year to year payroll and a much worse front office and organizational structure. 

Until there's a new owner we should want them to operate that way, yes. 

Expand  

Have you forgotten this is the White Sox?  In what universe are they going to make a risky forward-thinking move like trading Giolito?  Only a few clubs like the Rays have the stones to do that.  
 

It’s a nice thought but no way that happens.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...