Balta1701 Posted November 8 Share Posted November 8 6 minutes ago, caulfield12 said: Fine for the Braves, but that's the BEST, ultimate example of success. Out of 30 teams. 2% growth isn't even keeping up with inflation. Certainly going to see a lot more than 2% growth in the average MLB contract for players in arbitration and FA in terms of a year on year comparison. Actually 2% growth is keeping up with inflation now. Where does that article say the Braves had the best growth in the league? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 8 Share Posted November 8 https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/st-louis-cardinals-local-media-rights-deal.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 8 Author Share Posted November 8 35 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said: https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/st-louis-cardinals-local-media-rights-deal.html Basically they are back down to around $60 million and looking to trade all their big names (Gray Helsley Arenado and even Fedde) to go back into "retooling/retrenching" mode for 1-2 seasons. Still one of the most loyal fanbases in the sport, though. There has to be a lot of frustration with the stranglehold the even smaller market Brewers have on the division. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 9 Share Posted November 9 https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/mlb-atlanta-braves-object-bankruptcy.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 11 Author Share Posted November 11 Amazon's Jeff Bezos rumored to be willing to spend up to $6 billion for the Boston Celtics...which would simultaneously blow up the expansion fees for the next NBA move down the line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 8 hours ago, caulfield12 said: Amazon's Jeff Bezos rumored to be willing to spend up to $6 billion for the Boston Celtics...which would simultaneously blow up the expansion fees for the next NBA move down the line. That is a crazy number for the NFL, let alone NBA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11 Share Posted November 11 15 hours ago, caulfield12 said: Amazon's Jeff Bezos rumored to be willing to spend up to $6 billion for the Boston Celtics...which would simultaneously blow up the expansion fees for the next NBA move down the line. It's probably more like Bezos is willing to put together a syndicate of people willing to back a portion of the bank loans to buy the team. Doesn't the NBA show VC firms as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 11 Author Share Posted November 11 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Texsox said: It's probably more like Bezos is willing to put together a syndicate of people willing to back a portion of the bank loans to buy the team. Doesn't the NBA show VC firms as well? "They want the $6 billion because they want expansion teams in Seattle and Vegas, and Mexico City is kind of looming as a third team. But they want to get $6 billion apiece for two franchises for expansion, which would mean a check of $400 million to every NBA owner, all 30. So they're trying to establish a price for this Celtics team." https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/jeff-bezos-boston-celtics-sale-bill-simmons-grousbeck-nba/ On top of that, they don't own TD Garden, so probably a new stadium build like Ballmer in LA. Edited November 11 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 13 Share Posted November 13 https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/diamond-sports-fanduel-single-game.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 13 Author Share Posted November 13 Single game offerings for sports that aren't played every single day make MORE sense than for baseball obviously...there's the sense that some games are "events." Maybe if it was changed to buying an individual series of games or not.. .or all the Cubs games for a season against StL for example, SD/LA, Baltimore vs. Yankees, etc. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 14 Share Posted November 14 https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/diamond-bankruptcy-exit-likely-deals-angels-rays-tigers-mlb-braves.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 15 Share Posted November 15 https://awfulannouncing.com/mlb/produce-distribute-cincinnati-reds-broadcasts-next-season.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted November 16 Share Posted November 16 Why did Ballys go bankrupt with baseball traditionally a total moneymaker for those who televise it? The contracts awarded teams by networks makes the salaries possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tray Posted November 16 Share Posted November 16 (edited) On 3/8/2023 at 11:34 AM, caulfield12 said: The state of Illinois and Chicago from a financial and tax perspective certainly is relevant and will become increasingly more so in the coming years following demographic trends of blue staters leaving for states like AZ TX and FL, to name just three. Ask Melody Hobson if she thinks it is something to be considered...who is going to finance a new stadium for the White Sox privately, for example, in the future??? Reinsdorf owning basically the biggest share of NBCSports Chicago isn't the Top 3-5 broadcasting deal in all of sports anymore... essentially, the AL Central Division opponents in the long/er term will get bigger slices of the pie, the equivalent of revenue sharing. This year, the impact of those missed Bally/Sinclair payments/defaults might be more impactful as everyone adjusts financially, but the Sox are basically treading water and falling backwards on payroll from 7th to 12th due to spending increases by other teams as well as inflationary pressure in mega deals. Not sure what your question for Melody Hobson is. GRate field will not need to be replaced for 20 years or more. There are millions of baseball fans in and around Chicago. Retirees often relocate to warmer climates but the Chicago area will always be a great place to raise a family and watch our sports teams. When is the last time you attended a game in Chicago? Edited November 16 by tray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 16 Author Share Posted November 16 (edited) 10 hours ago, tray said: Not sure what your question for Melody Hobson is. GRate field will not need to be replaced for 20 years or more. There are millions of baseball fans in and around Chicago. Retirees often relocate to warmer climates but the Chicago area will always be a great place to raise a family and watch our sports teams. When is the last time you attended a game in Chicago? 2019 And GRF will be the third oldest stadium in baseball after Fenway and Wrigley.... Edited November 16 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 16 Share Posted November 16 1 hour ago, caulfield12 said: 2019 And GRF will be the third oldest stadium in baseball after Fenway and Wrigley.... Dodger Stadium says "hello..." 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 16 Author Share Posted November 16 27 minutes ago, Lip Man 1 said: Dodger Stadium says "hello..." But it won't be replaced in the next 20 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 17 Share Posted November 17 10 hours ago, caulfield12 said: But it won't be replaced in the next 20 years? It's in tremendous shape, the Dodgers put a lot of time and effort into keeping it so. It may not be replaced in 20 years. They just had a multi million dollar renovation for the All-Star Game for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 17 Author Share Posted November 17 2 hours ago, Lip Man 1 said: It's in tremendous shape, the Dodgers put a lot of time and effort into keeping it so. It may not be replaced in 20 years. They just had a multi million dollar renovation for the All-Star Game for example. Rhttps://www.dailybulletin.com/2024/10/29/dodgers-franchise-stadium-giant-sports-complex-coming-to-ontario/ Yes, they just spent $100 million on renovations…but that’s pocket change compared to the Ohtani Betts and Matsumoto deals. And twenty years is an eternity, the Rangers had three stadiums in that timespan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 20 Share Posted November 20 Headline in the Athletic today: MLB plans new national TV packages for 2028; changes to revenue sharing, CBA crucial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/survival-comcast-spinoff-save-cable.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted November 22 Author Share Posted November 22 5 hours ago, Lip Man 1 said: https://awfulannouncing.com/dsg/survival-comcast-spinoff-save-cable.html “So if you’re baseball, if you’re the NBA, if you’re the NHL, you still need access to the pay TV bundle for most, if not all, of your teams. And the ones that have forgone it have made a decision for a while to go to zero on the rights fees, my guess is they’ll probably have to come back to it.” That’s right; Crakes is predicting a back to the future development for those teams that have touted a move away from pay TV, like the Utah Jazz and Phoenix Suns. These teams are using a combination of over the air channels and streaming. And they are not shy about boasting a huge increase in viewership, which is a given when a paywall is removed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted Thursday at 06:09 PM Share Posted Thursday at 06:09 PM https://awfulannouncing.com/mlb/yankees-owner-rob-manfreds-tv-plan-optional.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted Thursday at 10:05 PM Author Share Posted Thursday at 10:05 PM Angels Blue Jays Cubs Dodgers Giants Mariners Yankees Mets Phillies Rangers Red Sox and perhaps St. Louis would be teams most hesitant about Manfred plan for obvious reasons. 30% of the league is at a significant competitive advantage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.webp.29cc6c9fee0f01ceeb4f722593e5e3ba.webp)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.