CentralChamps21 Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 13 hours ago, chw42 said: So they are shopping Fields, they just haven't liked the possible returns. Or they're trying to make everybody think they're shopping Fields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 3 hours ago, CentralChamps21 said: Or they're trying to make everybody think they're shopping Fields. Right, they’re not “shopping Fields”; they’re just answering phone calls from other teams shopping for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 It would be disappointing if this was a one year deal and no extension Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 30 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said: It would be disappointing if this was a one year deal and no extension Ask me in may. Depends if we get Odunze/ Nabers at 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Fields to Steelers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marqhead Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 https://x.com/rapsheet/status/1769131145688461483?s=46&t=wutq4G5mWyZYaNHxOURO_Q Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralChamps21 Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Kyyle23 said: Fields to Steelers 6th round pick that can become a 4th based on playing time. Would have kept him as the backup if that's all they got, especially since they're gonna need a backup with Braxton Jones at LT. Edited March 16 by CentralChamps21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 This should be a wake up call for the Bears who wanted to keep Fields over drafting Williams and yet it definitely won’t be. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 3 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said: 6th round pick that can become a 4th based on playing time. Would have kept him as the backup if that's all they got, especially since they're gonna need a backup with Braxton Jones at LT. Same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Wow. Not sure I’ve ever seen a bigger disconnect between perceived value and real value. I think Poles probably fucked this up, but I also kinda don’t blame him as it just lined up horribly and it’s clear coaches would prefer a QB who can run a passing offense. Clearly the shanahan/McVay coaches were not on board and that’s 3/4 of the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Just now, Chicago White Sox said: This should be a wake up call for the Bears who wanted to keep Fields over drafting Williams and yet it definitely won’t be. I’m pretty excited to watch them. I assume they’ll just move to crying how it’s a mistake instead of admitting how embarrassingly incapable they were of admitting reality. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 https://x.com/tompelissero/status/1769133559426510853?s=46&t=9lkBcVJmwvxFpyVi5DNtCg This guy just had zero support from the rest of the league. That said I’d be shocked if the Steelers locker room doesn’t side with fields and push a change. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harold's Leg Lift Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Thank God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 9 minutes ago, CentralChamps21 said: 6th round pick that can become a 4th based on playing time. Would have kept him as the backup if that's all they got, especially since they're gonna need a backup with Braxton Jones at LT. Which also means it is a next year pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball_gal_aly Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, bmags said: Wow. Not sure I’ve ever seen a bigger disconnect between perceived value and real value. I think Poles probably fucked this up, but I also kinda don’t blame him as it just lined up horribly and it’s clear coaches would prefer a QB who can run a passing offense. Clearly the shanahan/McVay coaches were not on board and that’s 3/4 of the league. Yeah, the league thought very poorly of Fields. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CentralChamps21 Posted March 16 Author Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, southsider2k5 said: Which also means it is a next year pick Meanwhile, they didn't sign Tyron Smith. Alt won't be available at 9. Fashanu might not either. LT is arguably the second-most important offensive position on the field and it's going to be the weakest position on the Bears offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: This should be a wake up call for the Bears who wanted to keep Fields over drafting Williams and yet it definitely won’t be. And Bears fans. Clueless. A QB’s most important ability is to be able to throw the ball accurately, not run. Edited March 16 by WhiteSox2023 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, baseball_gal_aly said: Yeah, the league thought very poorly of Fields. The rest of the league knows he can’t throw and is a RB playing QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, baseball_gal_aly said: Yeah, the league thought very poorly of Fields. I don’t think that’s necessarily true. They didn’t want to pay Poles price. He didn’t adjust until he ran out of options. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Dick Allen said: I don’t think that’s necessarily true. They didn’t want to pay Poles price. He didn’t adjust until he ran out of options. This could be it too. Poles might have been able to get a 4th rounder had he accepted an earlier offer. I think he was holding out for a 2nd or 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baseball_gal_aly Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 2 minutes ago, Dick Allen said: I don’t think that’s necessarily true. They didn’t want to pay Poles price. He didn’t adjust until he ran out of options. I will disagree. I thought Fields was still good enough to start somewhere, but I guess the league views him as a complete bust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSox2023 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 (edited) 4 minutes ago, baseball_gal_aly said: I will disagree. I thought Fields was still good enough to start somewhere, but I guess the league views him as a complete bust. Look at the other QBs that were traded for higher draft value. Poles definitely waited too long. He wasn’t going to get a 2nd or 3rd but I wouldn’t be surprised if a team had offered a pick higher than a conditional 6th. Edited March 16 by WhiteSox2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 9 minutes ago, Dick Allen said: I don’t think that’s necessarily true. They didn’t want to pay Poles price. He didn’t adjust until he ran out of options. If poles price was a starter price, nobody viewed him as a starter. This is a backup price that got worse as backups with longer contracts were acquired. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts