chw42 Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 9 hours ago, The Mighty Mite said: One of the few good moves by the Reinsdork regime was realizing that Abreu’s career was waning and they didn’t re-sign him. Yeah but they spent that money on Benintendi instead and it's not like that's working out any better. Not saying re-signing him would have been right but it's not like the FO was competent enough to spend that money any better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ducksnort Posted April 25 Share Posted April 25 (edited) Man I remember when the Sox signed him, how that was supposed to signify years of competitiveness. Possibly even a dynasty. Ignorant bliss. Edited April 25 by ScootsMcGoots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinky Stanky Posted April 26 Share Posted April 26 On 4/25/2024 at 5:53 AM, The Mighty Mite said: One of the few good moves by the Reinsdork regime was realizing that Abreu’s career was waning and they didn’t re-sign him. Equally amazed at who signed him. A team that’s supposed to know talent. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lip Man 1 Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 https://chicago.suntimes.com/mlb/2024/04/30/astros-will-send-slumping-first-baseman-jose-abreu-to-spring-training-facility Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted May 1 Author Share Posted May 1 I think he's 7 hits in 77 at bats. Obviously he's pulling a Hosmer. Only solution, retirement. Like the Astro guy said he still has the bat speed. He's just like Vaughn though. A mess at the plate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitekrazy Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 (edited) As players get older you never know when age sets in, It made no sense for the Sox to resign him since they never have a shortage of guys that are 1B/DH material. Edited May 1 by kitekrazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 20 minutes ago, kitekrazy said: As players get older you never know when age sets in, It made no sense for the Sox to resign him since they never have a shortage of guys that are 1B/DH material. There’s a huge difference between 1B/DH material and 1B/DH caliber. The Sox have a ton of the former and none of the latter. Abreu would not change that outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinky Stanky Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 On 4/25/2024 at 3:15 PM, chw42 said: Yeah but they spent that money on Benintendi instead and it's not like that's working out any better. Not saying re-signing him would have been right but it's not like the FO was competent enough to spend that money any better. Reminds of when the Wheeler money went to lesser talent as the wheels went off the track. That was the one that started the dominoes falling over IMO. Can’t blame management either. It’s the exception that proves the Sox rule about long term contracts for pitchers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 46 minutes ago, Stinky Stanky said: Reminds of when the Wheeler money went to lesser talent as the wheels went off the track. That was the one that started the dominoes falling over IMO. Can’t blame management either. It’s the exception that proves the Sox rule about long term contracts for pitchers. Went to Keuchel instead... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcq Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 Is Vaughn going to work out with Jose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EloyJenkins Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 4 hours ago, caulfield12 said: Went to Keuchel instead... Wheeler's Wife ruined the entire dynasty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chitownsportsfan Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 Can someone confirm that if he didn't except the assignment he would have forfeited his contract? Reporting on that is unclear. I'm just curious either way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tjp1684 Posted May 1 Share Posted May 1 It seems like as an owner you have to have money set aside to eat a contract and move on. Teams that sign a bad contract and then use it as an excuse to spend nothing more to compete won’t succeed. Perhaps they’ll put in an amnesty provision once owners like JR are out. Players will like it because it will give more money to more players. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.