Jump to content

2024 Official Draft Thread - Day 2


Recommended Posts

  On 7/15/2024 at 11:32 PM, mac9001 said:

If they went significantly over slot on the prep kids it just looks like a really poor strategy. There were likely guys on the board you could have taken under slot and not punted the rest of day 2.

Expand  

Exactly.  There were other players they could have taken of equal ability who wouldn't have required overslot.
OR actually go overslot for a player whose talent warrants it rather than reaching.

Edited by GreenSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/15/2024 at 11:32 PM, mac9001 said:

If they went significantly over slot on the prep kids it just looks like a really poor strategy. There were likely guys on the board you could have taken under slot and not punted the rest of day 2.

Expand  

The class isn’t good enough to pay slot all the way through. I’d much rather take Caleb Bonemar than give slot to bad players who don’t deserve it in 7-10. It’s a bad draft class 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB draft is such a crapshoot that if we hit on at least 2 picks, it's a win. Smith seems like a no brainer and Bonemar has such lightning tools that I'm really not worried about anything else. 

The only way for us to climb our way out of this hole is to trade well and fill it in with draft picks that hit. It seems like we've been fairly exceptional at developing pitching since the early 90's. At some point our luck with position players has to change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 1:01 AM, TaylorStSox said:

We've drafted position players fairly well too. We just haven't developed them. Generally ,we've been conservative with position players, but it's not like our drafts have been backwards k's. 

Expand  

This is an amazing politician answer.

"We've drafted good position players. They just didn't do well."

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Short of a big singing tomorrow I don't see the value in 2A/B to offset the underwhelming 3-10 picks. I've felt pretty good about the last two years and even the senior signs had some interesting attributes. But just not seeing a lot to get excited about the entire day 2 result. This and next year's draft were key to adding some impact bats that would set a foundation for the rebuild and I'm left feeling very underwhelmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 1:53 AM, mac9001 said:

Short of a big singing tomorrow I don't see the value in 2A/B to offset the underwhelming 3-10 picks. I've felt pretty good about the last two years and even the senior signs had some interesting attributes. But just not seeing a lot to get excited about the entire day 2 result. This and next year's draft were key to adding some impact bats that would set a foundation for the rebuild and I'm left feeling very underwhelmed.

Expand  

Caleb Bonemer ranked #36 in the class at BA. I’m guessing the White Sox feel similarly or higher 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 1:38 AM, Quin said:

This is an amazing politician answer.

"We've drafted good position players. They just didn't do well."

Expand  

I think it's fairly accurate. If you look at the history of our draft picks, most have been really positive with the exception of Madrigal and Fulmer. Some people were pissed about Gonzalez, but that's just because Keith Law didn't like him and Law has a cult. 

Edited by TaylorStSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 1:01 AM, TaylorStSox said:

We've drafted position players fairly well too. We just haven't developed them. Generally ,we've been conservative with position players, but it's not like our drafts have been backwards k's. 

Expand  

Who have we drafted as a position player in say the last 10 years who has dine anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 1:53 AM, mac9001 said:

Short of a big singing tomorrow I don't see the value in 2A/B to offset the underwhelming 3-10 picks. I've felt pretty good about the last two years and even the senior signs had some interesting attributes. But just not seeing a lot to get excited about the entire day 2 result. This and next year's draft were key to adding some impact bats that would set a foundation for the rebuild and I'm left feeling very underwhelmed.

Expand  

Especially if you are trying add talent to win in the next few years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 2:05 AM, TaylorStSox said:

I think it's fairly accurate. If you look at the history of our draft picks, most have been really positive with the exception of Madrigal and Fulmer. Some people were pissed about Gonzalez, but that's just because Keith Law didn't like him and Law has a cult. 

Expand  

This is three years old, but it's not like the Sox have had their fortunes change for the better in the past 3 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/16/2024 at 2:11 AM, southsider2k5 said:

Who have we drafted as a position player in say the last 10 years who has dine anything?

Expand  

The conversation is Vaughn, Burger and Collins. The only one of those picks I don't like is Burger, and it's only because of health. I still kind of have hope for Vaughn and Collins had such a good eye and natural power that I get the pick. Collins just didn't work out. It happens. Beyond that, the last position player we took was Anderson, and he was a star until his life destroyed his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...