Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 3 minutes ago, Chicago White Sox said: So do Pham & Clevinger ? Right but Sirota’s apparently contribute to his underachieving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 1 minute ago, Chicago White Sox said: To be honest, my main concern with McLain & Antonacci is a lack of upside. Just worry that given the lack of positional depth in the minors, that we went after high floor guys who have little to no chance of being difference makers (which Hostetler also did quite a bit when we kicked off the rebuild). I mean I guess this is fair but which difference could they have taken with the $1.3 million spent on those two guys? We’re talking about day two. Smith and Bonemer need to be difference makers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Y2Jimmy0 Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 If the White Sox would’ve taken Mike Sirota and Peyton Stovall, nobody would have an issue. The thing is though, none of us have any idea if those two players are better than McLain and Antonacci. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted July 24 Share Posted July 24 11 minutes ago, Y2Jimmy0 said: If the White Sox would’ve taken Mike Sirota and Peyton Stovall, nobody would have an issue. The thing is though, none of us have any idea if those two players are better than McLain and Antonacci. Better player I agree. But I do like the upside of those two you mentioned more than McLain & Antonacci. All that being said, Shirley probably deserves trust until proven otherwise. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.