Jump to content

Trevor Rodgers to BAL


southsider2k5

Recommended Posts

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:09 PM, Nardiwashere said:

As weird/bad as the Fedde trade was, I still wouldn't have been happy with what Baltimore sent to Miami. 

Expand  

That doesn’t make much sense.  Fedde has been much better than Rogers, although Rogers has a second year of control before free agency.  Neither Norby (Orioles #5 prospect) nor Vargas have a glove but even if they are on par, the Marlins also received an outfield bat in Stowers.  The Sox had to include Kopech with a better pitcher in Fedde for their return.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:18 PM, WhiteSox2023 said:

That doesn’t make much sense.  Fedde has been much better than Rogers, although Rogers has a second year of control before free agency.  Neither Norby nor Vargas have a glove but even if they are on par, the Marlins also received and OF bats.  The Sox had to include Kopech with a better pitcher in Fedde for their return.

Expand  

If the Sox traded Fedde for Norby and Stowers yesterday, you'd be posting how great it was?  I doubt it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can all agree that Chris Getz isn’t qualified to be the GM of an MLB franchise. That Fedde/Kopech/Pham deal was BRUTAL. Anyone who argues otherwise is dumb or a friend of Getz. The whole “we should be happy we got this for a guy who wasn’t even in the league last year” take is ridiculous. The Sox had a reliable/effective starting pitcher that many teams wanted, and Getz brings us back a bare cupboard package. Wake me up when Jerry sells our favorite team. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:23 PM, Nardiwashere said:

If the Sox traded Fedde for Norby and Stowers yesterday, you'd be posting how great it was?  I doubt it. 

Expand  

That’s about what people expected for Fedde initially.  A backend top 100 MLB prospect and a guy later than that.

And Fedde >>> Rogers.

It’s a better return than what Getz got back for Fedde + Kopech.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:18 PM, WhiteSox2023 said:

That doesn’t make much sense.  Fedde has been much better than Rogers, although Rogers has a second year of control before free agency.  Neither Norby (Orioles #5 prospect) nor Vargas have a glove but even if they are on par, the Marlins also received an outfield bat in Stowers.  The Sox had to include Kopech with a better pitcher in Fedde for their return.

Expand  

Maybe the league just isn't sold on Fedde being able to continue this performance. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:29 PM, ptatc said:

Maybe the league just isn't sold on Fedde being able to continue this performance. 

Expand  

But the league, or at least the Orioles, are sold on Rogers to be worth more?  He’s a ~4.50 ERA backend of the rotation starter.  I guess two more years of control over a mediocre starter is better than just one more year of control over a good starter?  Perplexing considering the Sox also included Kopech.

Edited by WhiteSox2023
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the league clearly isn't seeing Fedde as a sure bet, Getz still could have probably at least gotten another player of the caliber of the two 19 year olds we received, and also that Vargas is the superior prospect out of Vargas/Norby/Stowers which likely relates to why Sox dealt with Dodgers rather than O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:32 PM, WhiteSox2023 said:

But the league, or at least the Orioles, are sold on Rogers to be worth more?  He’s a ~4.50 ERA backend of the rotation starter.  I guess two more years of control over a mediocre starter is better than just one more year of control over a good starter?  Perplexing considering the Sox also included Kopech.

Expand  

Not like Kopech was having a stellar year. He's a talent project who hasn't lived up to any potential. What was he really worth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:33 PM, Jake said:

I think the league clearly isn't seeing Fedde as a sure bet, Getz still could have probably at least gotten another player of the caliber of the two 19 year olds we received, and also that Vargas is the superior prospect out of Vargas/Norby/Stowers which likely relates to why Sox dealt with Dodgers rather than O's.

Expand  

Based on the quotes outside the org. Vargas is not viewed that way. Clearly, the Sox value him like that. We’ll see who’s right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vargas probably better than Norby.  Stowers does nothing for me on this team.  I wont pretend to know about the 19 year olds we got.

I'd bet Elias offered this deal to the Sox and they chose Vargas over Norby, which is reasonable.

The problem with the Fedde trade was it was one player short, especially if we included Kopech... who isn't great but had some value.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:42 PM, Nardiwashere said:

Vargas probably better than Norby.  Stowers does nothing for me on this team.  I wont pretend to know about the 19 year olds we got.

I'd bet Elias offered this deal to the Sox and they chose Vargas over Norby, which is reasonable.

The problem with the Fedde trade was it was one player short, especially if we included Kopech... who isn't great but had some value.   

Expand  

It's more than a player short... It's a headliner short.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 7/30/2024 at 6:42 PM, Nardiwashere said:

Vargas probably better than Norby.  Stowers does nothing for me on this team.  I wont pretend to know about the 19 year olds we got.

I'd bet Elias offered this deal to the Sox and they chose Vargas over Norby, which is reasonable.

The problem with the Fedde trade was it was one player short, especially if we included Kopech... who isn't great but had some value.   

Expand  

The Sox picked up an average prospect who is out for the season. It's woefully short. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...